To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Personal Names: Deed Poll
Wednesday 10th May 2023

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what facilities exist for (1) the police, and (2) the public, to establish previous changes of name by enrolled deed poll of individuals.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

There is no limit to the number of times a person can change their name by the enrolled deed poll process. This is consistent with long stablished common law rights for people to change their name and the European Convention of Human Rights. Changing a name for a deceptive or fraudulent purpose could however be prosecuted as part of the underlying fraud or deception.

Upon enrolment the deed is advertised in the London Gazette by the High Court providing a searchable public record of enrolled deed name changes. As such, the Government does not believe there are any grounds for concerns relating to national security, the work of the police or money laundering arising from the process.


Written Question
Personal Names: Deed Poll
Wednesday 10th May 2023

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether there is any limit on the number of occasions that an individual can register a change of name by enrolled deed poll; and if not, what assessment they have made of the implications for (1) national security, (2) the work of the police, and (3) money laundering.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

There is no limit to the number of times a person can change their name by the enrolled deed poll process. This is consistent with long stablished common law rights for people to change their name and the European Convention of Human Rights. Changing a name for a deceptive or fraudulent purpose could however be prosecuted as part of the underlying fraud or deception.

Upon enrolment the deed is advertised in the London Gazette by the High Court providing a searchable public record of enrolled deed name changes. As such, the Government does not believe there are any grounds for concerns relating to national security, the work of the police or money laundering arising from the process.


Written Question
Community Orders
Wednesday 14th July 2021

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many hours of unpaid work have been completed as part of Community Sentences in each of the last five years.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

The number of UPW hours delivered in the last five years are:

  • April 2016 to March 2017: 5,582,445
  • April 2017 to March 2018: 5,382,173
  • April 2018 to March 2019: 5,310,526
  • April 2019 to March 2020: 4,868,990
  • April 2020 to March 2021: 1,356,061

The figures for April 2020 – March 2021 evidence a decline in unpaid work delivery resulting from the pandemic and the need to comply with public health regulations, such as lockdowns and social distancing measures.

Prior to 26th June 2021, Community Rehabilitation Companies were responsible for the delivery of unpaid work. Since then, the new unified probation service has assumed responsibility for unpaid work delivery. This has provided an opportunity to re-energise our work, drive up completion rates and deliver better outcomes. We will deliver better quality and more robust unpaid work placements that are highly visible to the public and that meet both punitive and reparative aims. We want to move away from a reliance on individual placements towards incorporating larger national projects with public bodies and charities and we are keen to involve our stakeholders as much as possible in our plans.


Written Question
Prisoners: Coronavirus
Wednesday 14th July 2021

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people serving custodial sentences in England and Wales have died from COVID-19.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

Verified data on the total number of prisoners who have died having tested positive for COVID-19, or where there was a clinical assessment that COVID-19 was a contributory factor in their deaths, is published on GOV.UK. The latest published figures are for the period up to 30 June in which 149 prisoner deaths were reported. This figure includes those on remand as well as serving custodial sentences. Of these 149 prisoner deaths, 123 are suspected or confirmed to be due to COVID-19. The remaining 27 deaths are believed to be due to other causes, although the individuals had tested positive for COVID-19.


Written Question
Community Orders
Wednesday 14th July 2021

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that all Community Sentences are completed.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

On 26 June, we transitioned to a new model of probation delivery. These reforms will mean that the delivery of key requirements under community sentences is now the responsibility of the Probation Service. Our new probation service is now responsible for sentence management in both England and Wales, along with Accredited Programmes, Unpaid Work, and Structured Interventions. This simplifies delivery, making it easier for those we work with and giving us greater control of staff and resources to be able to deliver reform. It will strengthen rehabilitation by delivering improved better accredited programmes and other rehabilitative interventions, alongside commissioning specialist services from other organisations.

We have demonstrated our commitment and ability to deliver an effective probation service despite significant challenges during the pandemic. The Probation Service has prioritised public protection and risk management, as well as delivery of advice to courts, whilst ensuring staff, people on probation, victims and the general public remain safe.

Exceptional Delivery Models, which set out how we operate during the pandemic and ensured services could be continued, were implemented across England and Wales. In-person, socially distanced, offender management continued to be the default for those people on probation who posed a higher risk, for example Terrorism Act offenders. For other cohorts, blended supervision models were deployed, involving various combinations of home visits, face to face appointments, telephone or video contact. The delivery of Unpaid Work has been maximised in line with social distancing restrictions throughout the pandemic, keeping staff and offenders safe. Offenders have been working on outdoor projects and those which support the UK’s recovery from Covid-19, and some have completed projects at home where feasible. For Accredited Programmes, we developed alternative delivery formats to enable continued delivery of Programmes remotely or in smaller groups in person where safe to do so, prioritising offenders who posed the highest risk of harm.

As social distancing restrictions ease, we are continuing to increase delivery rates across our services. This includes key requirements such as unpaid work and accredited programmes.


Written Question
Community Orders: Coronavirus
Wednesday 14th July 2021

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many hours of unpaid work due to be undertaken as part of Community Sentences given (1) before 23 March 2020, and (2) since that date, have been (a) completed, and (b) deferred as a result of COVID-19 restrictions.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

As unpaid work is necessarily often delivered in groups, such work was unavoidably adversely affected by Covid-19. However, unpaid work has not been deferred. Probation worked hard to innovate unpaid work delivery so that some placements could continue to be delivered safely, including home based projects for local charities and offenders supporting vaccination centres. Nevertheless, due to the adverse effect on delivery rates, probation have been managing a backlog of requirements. We are working closely with our CJS partners to accelerate the delivery of unpaid work and, where appropriate, apply for unpaid work orders to be extended so that hours can be completed after the original 12-month period specified in the legislation. There are approximately 5m hours of unpaid work on the caseload currently, 4m (80%) are in relation to requirements that are still within their normal delivery window or agreed extension.

Of all UPW requirements on the probation case list as of 26th June 2021

  • For sentences prior to 23/3/2020, 539,236 hours were delivered.
  • For sentences after 23/03/2020, 749,311 hours were delivered.

However, this is a dynamic data set. Some of these requirements are still being worked (yet to reach 12 months from sentencing) and others on the backlog (i.e. post 12 months from sentencing) are being pursued for completion.

There is often a delay in recording completed UPW hours. UPW completed over the weekend of the 26th and 27th of June 2021 is unlikely to be fully represented in this data. While all reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure the accuracy of this data, the inaccuracy inherent in any large-scale administrative data means data should not be assumed to be fully accurate.


Written Question
Terrorism: Prison Sentences
Friday 11th June 2021

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individuals are currently serving custodial sentences for terrorist offences in the United Kingdom; and which prisons are used for confining such persons.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

As reported in the latest statistics released on gov.uk, there were 184 persons serving custodial sentences for terrorist offences in Great Britain (as of 31 December 2020). A further 25 were being held on remand, ahead of trial or sentencing. Those in custody are assessed according to their individual risk and rehabilitation needs and are held in various prisons across the estate. We do not disclose operational detail regarding the location of all terrorist offenders in prison.

Data detailing the number of people serving custodial sentences for terrorist offences is available at Gov.uk. You can access this information here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/operation-of-police-powers-under-the-terrorism-act-2000-quarterly-update-to-december-2020

Northern Ireland Security statistics are available and published by the Northern Ireland Office.


Written Question
Civil Servants: Convictions
Thursday 4th July 2019

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many civil servants in (1) HM Treasury, (2) the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and (3) the Ministry of Defence, have been convicted in open court and sentenced to prison for offences in connection with their official duties, in each of the last ten years.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie

Detailed information on the occupation of the defendant may be held on individual court records. To be able to identify these cases, we would have to access and search individual court records which would be of disproportionate cost.


Written Question
Court of Protection
Wednesday 15th May 2019

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many applications have been made to the Court of Protection in each of the last three years; and what was the average time between the application being stamped and an order made in each of the last three years.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie

Information about the number of applications made to the Court of Protection is published at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2018

In respect of the number of applications received in the three years specified in the question, the data are set out below:

Applications to the Court of Protection

1 January – 31 December 2018

32,029

1 January – 31 December 2017

31,332

1 January – 31 December 2016

29,711

Data showing the average time between the application being stamped and an order made could only be provided at disproportionate cost.


Written Question
Terrorism
Wednesday 11th April 2018

Asked by: Lord Marlesford (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to arrange for all persons serving custodial sentences for terrorist offences to receive copies of the judgment of Mr Justice Haddon-Cave when he sentenced Ahmed Hassan to a minimum of 34 years in prison for attempted murder for planting a bomb on a tube train at Parsons Green.

Answered by Lord Keen of Elie

We have no plans to do so. Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) works closely with a range of partners to tackle terrorism and extremism of all ideologies. HMPPS also has a strong multi-faith Chaplaincy dedicated to working with prisoners on all faith matters including providing a proper understanding of Islam. In addition over 13,000 prison staff have received specialist extremism awareness training since January 2017.