Lord Millett Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Millett

Information between 2nd May 2023 - 26th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Lord Millett mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Friday 9th February 2024
Written Evidence - Peter Ashford Ltd
ARB0015 - Arbitration Bill [HL]

Arbitration Bill [HL] Special Public Bill Committee

Found: (emphasis added) - see Court of Appeal Judgment at [2018] EWCA Civ 817 at [18]. 6 See Lord Millett

Wednesday 8th September 2021
Written Evidence - University of Glasgow
HAB0377 - The Rights of Cohabiting Partners

The Rights of Cohabiting Partners - Women and Equalities Committee

Found: Lord Millett in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, [2004] 2 AC 557, at 588, who observed that



Non-Departmental Publications - News and Communications
Dec. 23 2025
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: [2025] UKUT 00428 (TCC) Alimohammed v HMRC
Document: UT-2024-000121 Alimohammed v HMRC (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: As explained by Lord Millett in Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 at 127H–128C: 5 “We speak of

Jul. 31 2025
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Source Page: Louise Akester and 126 Others v Burlington Care (Yorkshire) Ltd (1) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (2) Department of Health and Social Care (3): [2025] EAT 111
Document: Louise Akester and 126 Others v Burlington Care (Yorkshire) Ltd (1) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (2) Department of Health and Social Care (3): [2025] EAT 111 (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: In Hallam, Lord Millett, at [18], referring to what he had said in Anyanwu, said that “aiding requires

Jul. 01 2025
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: BENOIT D’ANGELIN v THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS [2025] UKUT 00212 (TCC)
Document: Benoit D’Angelin v The Commissioners of His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: In support of that view, he cites Lord Millett in R (Edison First Power Ltd) v Central Valuation Officer

Jun. 30 2025
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: LARRY TRACHTENBERG v THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS [2025] UKUT 00206 (TCC)
Document: Larry Trachtenberg v The Commissioners off his Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: R (Edison First Power Ltd) v Central Valuation Officer [2003] UKHL 20, [2003] 4 All ER 209, Lord Millett

Jun. 03 2025
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: [2025] UKUT 00164 (TCC) Nellsar Limited v The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Document: Nellsar Limited v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: Enforcement Act 2007 23 see Henderson LJ in Degorce v HMRC [2017] EWCA Civ 1427 at [95] and Lord Millett

Mar. 25 2025
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: MORGAN LLOYD TRUSTEES LIMITED v THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS : [2025] UKUT 00102 (TCC)
Document: Morgan Lloyd Trustees Limited v The Commissioners of His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: weight to be given to particular evidence is a matter for the first instance decision-maker, as Lord Millett

Dec. 05 2024
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: JAMES EDWARD STALEY v THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY [2024] UKUT 00394 (TCC)
Document: James Edward Staley v The Financial Conduct Authority (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: As Lord Millett put it, there must be some fact “which tilts the balance and justifies an inference

Jun. 21 2024
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: TELENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED v THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS [2024] UKUT 00183 (TCC)
Document: Telent Technology Services Limited v The Commissioners of His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: This approach, as I see it, is consistent with the conclusion of my noble and learned friend Lord Millett

Jun. 12 2024
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: TIMOTHY WATTS v THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS [2024] UKUT 00168 (TCC)
Document: Timothy Watts v HMRC final decision (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: Lord Millett said that “The supposed dichotomy between legal and commercial concept s has caused great

Jun. 14 2023
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
Source Page: Banque Haviland,Edmund Lloyd Rowland,Vladimir Bolelyy and David John Rowland 3rd Party [2023] UKUT 00136 (TCC)
Document: Banque Havilland etc preliminary issue decision for release (PDF)
News and Communications

Found: Lord Millett said at [38]: “The question is one of statutory construction.