Information between 13th July 2025 - 23rd July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 171 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 282 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 153 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 148 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 240 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 237 Noes - 223 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 150 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 130 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 140 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 162 |
|
21 Jul 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 143 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Enterprise Act 2002 (Mergers Involving Newspaper Enterprises and Foreign Powers) Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 100 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 267 |
|
22 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit Bill - View Vote Context Lord Norton of Louth voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 17 Noes - 120 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
House of Lords: Public Appointments
Asked by: Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Baroness Smith of Basildon on 19 June (HLWS717) on nominations to the House of Lords, what consultations took place with the House of Lords Appointments Commission and other relevant bodies prior to the statement. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal The Government is grateful for the work of the House of Lords Appointments Commission in nominating individuals to the crossbenches and vetting all candidates for appointment to the House of Lords for propriety.
The written statement set out how the Prime Minister will approach appointments to the House of Lords and reflects the existing roles and responsibilities of all parties in the appointments system, including the Prime Minister, the Commission and party leaders.
|
|
House of Lords: Public Appointments
Asked by: Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Baroness Smith of Basildon on 19 June (HLWS717) on nominations to the House of Lords, what is the limit on the number of recommendations they will make directly each year of candidates to sit as crossbench peers. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal It is established practice that the Prime Minister can appoint individuals with a record of service to the public to the crossbenches. As set out in the written statement, the Prime Minister will continue to make a limited number of appointments via this route.
The number of appointments to the House of Lords is a matter for the Prime Minister and any future appointments will be announced in the normal way.
|
|
House of Lords: Public Appointments
Asked by: Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 16th July 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Smith of Basildon on 19 June (HLWS717), how the Prime Minister recommending a limited number of candidates to sit as Crossbench peers will differ from the responsibility vested in the House of Lords Appointments Commission to nominate Crossbench peers. Answered by Baroness Smith of Basildon - Leader of the House of Lords and Lord Privy Seal As set out in the written statement, the Prime Minister will continue to ask the House of Lords Appointments Commission to make nominations for individuals to sit as Crossbench peers. The Commission invites applications from the public and assesses candidates against the criteria set out on its website.
It is established practice that the Prime Minister can recommend a limited number of individuals to sit as Crossbench peers, based on their public service, including both distinguished public servants on retirement and individuals with a proven track record of service to the public. These nominations will continue to be vetted for propriety by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.
|