Debates between Lord Reid of Cardowan and Lord Howard of Lympne during the 2019 Parliament

Wed 9th Feb 2022

Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill

Debate between Lord Reid of Cardowan and Lord Howard of Lympne
Lord Howard of Lympne Portrait Lord Howard of Lympne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Baroness and her friends cannot possibly give an assurance that a circumstance will not arise not precisely the same as that which occurred between 2017 and 2019 but in which a simple majority could not be obtained for an election, because a majority of the House of Commons was content to stymie and hobble the Government and keep them in place in that paralysed state, which was what we saw in that unhappy time.

Lord Reid of Cardowan Portrait Lord Reid of Cardowan (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The noble Lord seems to be missing the fundamental fact that the problems to which he referred took place under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, which required a two-thirds majority. This Bill gets rid of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. The circumstances that occurred in 2017-19, as the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, pointed out, cannot recur in absence of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

Lord Howard of Lympne Portrait Lord Howard of Lympne (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

With respect to the noble Lord—he knows I have great respect for him—I do not think that he was listening to what I have just said in answer to his noble friend. All this Bill does is to replace the bar of the two-thirds majority which the Fixed-term Parliaments Act provided with a slightly lower bar, but there is still a bar and it is perfectly conceivable that we could have a House of Commons in which the Government did not have a majority.