To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Victoria Tower Gardens
Friday 11th April 2025

Asked by: Lord Robathan (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the inclusion of Victoria Tower Gardens on the list published by Europa Nostra and the European Investment Bank, 7 most endangered heritage sites in Europe for 2025, on 18 March.

Answered by Lord Khan of Burnley

The design for the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre was chosen because it is sensitive to the heritage and existing uses of Victoria Tower Gardens, and includes enhancements that will help all visitors, including better pathways and improved access to existing memorials.

In considering the planning application, the independent Inspector looked in detail at matters such as the impact on the Gardens and existing Memorials.  He concluded that any harms to heritage assets or open space were outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.


Written Question
Housing: Bricks
Wednesday 13th November 2024

Asked by: Lord Robathan (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government what provisions they are making for the red-listed category of cavity nesting birds which are reliant on buildings for suitable nesting cavities; and whether they intends to mandate the provision of swift bricks in new building projects.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Government is considering what action may be appropriate to help birds reliant on buildings to breed, including how to drive up rates of swift brick installation in new build properties.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 15 Nov 2021
Islamophobia

"My Lords, I think the House will be united against anybody who discriminates against somebody on their beliefs, but I will follow up on the last question about what exactly we mean by “Islamophobia”. I understand that it means fear of Islam. Why should one be frightened of one of …..."
Lord Robathan - View Speech

View all Lord Robathan (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Islamophobia

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 02 Mar 2021
Rough Sleeping

"My Lords, it is very good news that rough sleeping is in decline, and I congratulate the Government and all those concerned on that success. There is one difficult cohort that is not covered in the Statement: those coming temporarily from abroad, often to beg or for other purposes, who, …..."
Lord Robathan - View Speech

View all Lord Robathan (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Rough Sleeping

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 13 Jul 2020
Business and Planning Bill

"My Lords, I was moved to speak on this amendment because it seems to negate the purpose of this part of the emergency Bill, which is to allow people out on to the pavements to smoke and drink. I have not smoked a cigarette since I was about 11. I …..."
Lord Robathan - View Speech

View all Lord Robathan (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Business and Planning Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 13 Jul 2020
Business and Planning Bill

"My Lords, I am sure that the Committee will be pleased to know that I will be extremely brief, not least because—I should declare this—the Chief Whip has asked me to be. I should also declare that I have not a financial but a family interest, in that my wife …..."
Lord Robathan - View Speech

View all Lord Robathan (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Business and Planning Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 16 Jun 2020
Planning Process: Probity

"Following on from the question asked by the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, I pay tribute to the Holocaust Educational Trust that some dozen years ago took me on an inspirational yet horrifying visit to Auschwitz. However, Victoria Tower Gardens is the wrong place for an educational centre. Again, there is …..."
Lord Robathan - View Speech

View all Lord Robathan (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Planning Process: Probity

Written Question
National Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Service
Wednesday 19th April 2017

Asked by: Lord Robathan (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in the light of the report from the Prime Minister’s Holocaust Commission, published in January 2015, which identified three prospective sites for the intended Holocaust Memorial, for what reasons, and by what means, was a different site in Victoria Tower Gardens chosen.

Answered by Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth

The Holocaust Commission's report was clear that the three potential sites it identified were “not the only possible sites”. As the cross-party body advising Government on taking forward the recommendations of the Holocaust Commission, the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation was tasked with finding the most appropriate location for a national memorial to the Holocaust and an accompanying education centre. The Government agrees with the Foundation’s recommendation that Victoria Tower Gardens, next to Parliament, is considered the most appropriate of the almost 50 sites examined, including those identified by the Commission in Lambeth and at Millbank. The option of locating at Potters Field referred to in the Holocaust Commission report no longer exists.