To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Foreign Companies: Russia
Thursday 1st August 2024

Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government on what basis UK courts have had jurisdiction to hear cases started in Russian Courts between Russian companies and individuals since the start of the war in Ukraine.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

The question of whether courts in England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear claims brought by parties from other countries are determined by the courts in accordance with common law principles and international conventions.

In English and Welsh law, the determination of the appropriate forum (where no international convention applies) to hear a dispute is the one in which the case may most suitably be tried in the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice. Matters which a court will take into account in deciding this would include whether there are any factors connecting the dispute to a particular jurisdiction.

It is open to the opposing party to challenge a claim on the basis that it should have been brought in another jurisdiction.


Written Question
Foreign Companies: Russia
Thursday 1st August 2024

Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government why Russian state-owned companies are being allowed access to UK courts to pursue litigation concerning penalties imposed by Russian courts.

Answered by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

The question of whether courts in England and Wales have jurisdiction to hear claims brought by parties from other countries are determined by the courts in accordance with common law principles and international conventions.

In English and Welsh law, the determination of the appropriate forum (where no international convention applies) to hear a dispute is the one in which the case may most suitably be tried in the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice. Matters which a court will take into account in deciding this would include whether there are any factors connecting the dispute to a particular jurisdiction.

It is open to the opposing party to challenge a claim on the basis that it should have been brought in another jurisdiction.


Written Question
Funerals: Standards
Tuesday 19th September 2023

Asked by: Lord Rooker (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of delays in funerals being caused by (1) the existing system for registering a death, (2) the number of available pathologists, (3) delays in completion of Medical Certificate Cause of Death forms and access to local GPs, (4) the availability of mortuary storage at local hospitals and public mortuaries, and (5) any delays by medical examiners.

Answered by Lord Bellamy

Whilst the Government does not have operational responsibility for the provision of funeral services, we are aware of funeral delays in some areas and acknowledge that these are often exacerbated by pressures from within the wider death management system.

Government departments are taking a collaborative approach to reforming the death registration system as part of the roll out of the statutory medical examiner scheme which will come into force in April 2024. The doctor who attended the deceased during their last illness has a legal responsibility to complete a Medical Certificate Cause of Death (MCCD) as soon as possible to enable the registration of the death to take place. Guidance for doctors on completing an MCCD, available on Gov.uk, emphasises this point. As part of the work on the statutory medical examiner scheme, the Department of Health and Social Care is looking at expanding the pool of doctors who can sign the MCCD forms. When the demand on civil registration services is high, death registration appointments will always take priority over other registration appointments.

The Government continues to look at wider improvements to the death management system’s capacity and resilience, including mortuary capacity. The shortage of pathologists is a long-standing and cross-cutting issue. The Government is determined to make progress as soon as practicable. To that end, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State is engaging with Ministerial colleagues to implement effective solutions through a cross-government action plan.


Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 12 Jan 2022
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

"..."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 12 Jan 2022
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

"My Lords, I beg to move Amendment 109A, which proposes a new clause. I freely admit that the content of what I am about to say is really nothing to do with the Bill; the Bill is a vehicle for a change quite unconnected with its main thrust. Oh! You …..."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 12 Jan 2022
Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

"I remind the House that I said that the Food Standards Agency, and therefore the unit, can use the powers of RIPA and the CHIS Act that we passed last year. We are not dealing with some little quango here; this is a government department. If the Government were serious, …..."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 14 Jun 2021
Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

"To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the estimated cost to public funds of people based outside the United Kingdom using UK courts to mount libel and defamation cases against (1) people, and (2) publications, based in the United Kingdom...."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 14 Jun 2021
Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

"Is the Minister aware that five Russian billionaires are involved in a strategic lawsuit in London against the journalist Catherine Belton as a result of her book, Putin’s People? Why should Igor Sechin, Roman Abramovich, Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven and Shalva Chigirinsky be using London lawyers Carter-Ruck, CMS, Harbottle …..."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 14 Jun 2021
Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

"They have vested interests...."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Libel and Defamation Cases: Cost to Public Funds

Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 03 Feb 2021
Domestic Abuse Bill

"My Lords, my quick message to Hansard is that they can tear up the note I sent earlier. In fact, the noble Lord, Lord Randall of Uxbridge, has just made the speech I decided to make having listened to the debate. I do not propose to repeat what he said, …..."
Lord Rooker - View Speech

View all Lord Rooker (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Domestic Abuse Bill