Information between 2nd November 2024 - 21st April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 147 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139 |
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 130 |
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 132 |
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 152 |
24 Mar 2025 - Local Authorities (Changes to Years of Ordinary Elections) (England) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 63 Noes - 163 |
24 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 172 |
13 Jan 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 120 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 228 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 159 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 146 Noes - 189 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Smith of Finsbury voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 207 |
Written Answers |
---|
Mobile Phones: Rural Areas
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made, if any, of the potential for emergency use of satellite communication in remote areas of the UK which are currently without any normal mobile coverage. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Satellite connectivity can complement the coverage provided by terrestrial mobile networks by providing connectivity, for example, in remote areas beyond their reach. The mobile operators have already used satellite services to provide backhaul to some Shared Rural Network sites where it is challenging to provide traditional fibre or microwave backhaul. Ofcom is currently consulting on proposals to authorise Direct to Device satellite services in certain mobile spectrum bands in the UK. These proposals could enable people to make satellite calls from their mobile phones and bring mobile coverage to rural areas. This consultation is an important and pioneering step towards enabling these services. We also welcome Vodafone’s recent trial in which the first ever video call over satellite was made, from an area with no terrestrial mobile coverage. |
Shared Rural Network: Highlands of Scotland
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had, if any, with representatives of community councils in the Highland Council area about the future of the Shared Rural Network programme. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Feedback from community councils and special interest groups play an important role in agreeing the best locations for new infrastructure as part of the Shared Rural Network (SRN). Both the government and the four mobile network operators have worked with stakeholders across Scotland to ensure the benefits of new sites are balanced with any environmental impacts and other concerns. |
Shared Rural Network
Asked by: Lord Smith of Finsbury (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask His Majesty's Government what further consideration they have given to the size and coverage of the Shared Rural Network programme, and whether they have made any change to the scale of the programme or number of masts required as a result. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Shared Rural Network (SRN) has already delivered significant coverage improvements across the UK. However, there are still rural parts of the UK where there is either limited or no mobile coverage. The government-funded parts of the SRN will deliver this new coverage by utilising existing Home Office masts across Great Britain and building new masts in Scotland. We continue to work with the four mobile network operators to minimise the number of new masts required in Scotland and now expect to meet this part of the programme’s objectives with far fewer masts than originally planned. We expect to reach a position on exactly how many new masts will be built in Scotland soon. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Finance Bill
35 speeches (18,789 words) 2nd reading Wednesday 19th March 2025 - Lords Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Baroness Caine of Kentish Town (Lab - Life peer) That trail was first laid by my noble friend Lord Smith of Finsbury when he was Secretary of State for - Link to Speech |
Museums and Galleries: Admission Charges for Non-UK Residents
21 speeches (1,491 words) Thursday 6th March 2025 - Lords Chamber Mentions: 1: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) But there are many downsides to reversing the legacy of the noble Lord, Lord Smith of Finsbury. - Link to Speech |