Lord Woodley Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Woodley

Information between 8th October 2025 - 28th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 128 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 111 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 148 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236


Speeches
Lord Woodley speeches from: Education in Prisons
Lord Woodley contributed 1 speech (81 words)
Tuesday 21st October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice



Lord Woodley mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

13 Oct 2025, 8:13 p.m. - House of Lords
"was previously brought brought by the local Lord Woodley and is now tabled by the noble Lord Moynihan on "
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill, Minister of State (Department for Transport) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 8:21 p.m. - House of Lords
"His amendment is concerned. It is one, of course. It was originally drafted by my Noble friend Lord Woodley, who unfortunately couldn't "
Lord Snape (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 8:27 p.m. - House of Lords
"Lord Woodley couldn't be present. And the fact is that it's now been adopted by the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, who I suspect has done it "
Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 8:27 p.m. - House of Lords
">> And the fact is that the amendment was never actually debated in committee because the noble Lord Lord Woodley couldn't be present. "
Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
13 Oct 2025, 8:29 p.m. - House of Lords
"it, because sadly, Lord Woodley was extremely. >> Important issue. >> And we've heard earlier this "
Lord Moynihan (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL]
46 speeches (8,295 words)
Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons
Monday 13th October 2025 - Lords Chamber
Department for Transport
Mentions:
1: Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill (Lab - Life peer) must be right for them.I now turn to Motion 31A, which was previously brought by the noble Lord, Lord Woodley - Link to Speech
2: Lord Snape (Lab - Life peer) which he referred.As for the noble Lord’s amendment, it was originally drafted by my noble friend Lord Woodley - Link to Speech
3: Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary) he was lauding on my noble friend Lord Moylan with regard to the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Woodley - Link to Speech
4: Lord Snape (Lab - Life peer) The fact is that the amendment was never actually debated in Committee because the noble Lord, Lord Woodley - Link to Speech
5: Lord Moynihan (Con - Excepted Hereditary) , but, in his absence, the opportunity arose for me to move it because, sadly, the noble Lord, Lord Woodley - Link to Speech