Lord Woodley Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Woodley

Information between 17th March 2026 - 25th July 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 149 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 161
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 241 Noes - 175
23 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 159 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 225
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Labour No votes vs 6 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 169
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 147 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 158
20 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 180
27 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 5 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 165
28 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 181
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 142 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 148
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Woodley voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 161 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188


Speeches
Lord Woodley speeches from: Imprisonment for Public Protection
Lord Woodley contributed 1 speech (115 words)
Thursday 2nd July 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Lord Woodley speeches from: Royal Mail
Lord Woodley contributed 1 speech (41 words)
Monday 8th June 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Business and Trade
Lord Woodley speeches from: HBOS: Fraud Investigation
Lord Woodley contributed 1 speech (33 words)
Thursday 26th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
HM Treasury
Lord Woodley speeches from: Birmingham City Council and Unite: Refuse Workers’ Pay
Lord Woodley contributed 3 speeches (144 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government


Written Answers
Waste Disposal: Birmingham
Asked by: Lord Woodley (Labour - Life peer)
Wednesday 25th March 2026

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the statement by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 17 March (HL Deb cols 757–758) that “it is not true that commissioners are blocking a viable deal”, whether they will confirm that those commissioners last year blocked a deal that had been reached between the chief executive of Birmingham Council and the Unite union to end the industrial dispute between the council and refuse workers, and if so, what steps they will take to clarify that point publicly.

Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

We have been clear that the government is not a party to the ongoing waste dispute, and this is a local matter that the relevant parties must resolve. Like all authorities, Birmingham City Council has legal duties with which its statutory officers must ensure compliance, including in relation to equal pay and the ongoing waste dispute. Throughout the all-out strike, Commissioners have consistently outlined that any resolution to the dispute must be lawful, must represent value for money and must not exacerbate unfairness relating to equal pay. Commissioners have also set out that any possible agreement with Unite must be approved through the Council's formal processes.




Lord Woodley mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

17 Mar 2026, 3:05 p.m. - House of Lords
">> Mind the words of Ward Lord Woodley on the position of the commissioners. Does the government have full confidence in the "
Lord McLoughlin (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
17 Mar 2026, 3:02 p.m. - House of Lords
" A third Oral Question Lord Woodley. Woodley. >> I beg leave to ask the question, send in my name and declare an interest. As the former General "
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
G7 Summit
32 speeches (6,395 words)
Tuesday 23rd June 2026 - Lords Chamber
Leader of the House
Mentions:
1: Lord True (Con - Life peer) We have heard it here from the noble Lord, Lord Woodley, and others. - Link to Speech

Birmingham City Council and Unite: Refuse Workers’ Pay
24 speeches (1,660 words)
Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Mentions:
1: Lord McLoughlin (Con - Life peer) Bearing in mind the words of the noble Lord, Lord Woodley, on the position of the commissioners, do the - Link to Speech



Deposited Papers
Wednesday 22nd April 2026

Source Page: letter dated 16/04/2026 from Lord Livermore to Lord Woodley regarding the Dobbs Review, as raised during a question concerning Lloyds Bank’s investigation of fraud at HBOS. 1p.
Document: FST_follow-up_Lord_Woodley.pdf (PDF)

Found: letter dated 16/04/2026 from Lord Livermore to Lord Woodley regarding the Dobbs Review, as raised during