All 2 Debates between Afzal Khan and Rosie Winterton

Tue 25th Jan 2022
Wed 9th May 2018
Points of Order
Commons Chamber

1st reading: House of Commons

Consumer Protection (Double Charging)

Debate between Afzal Khan and Rosie Winterton
1st reading
Tuesday 25th January 2022

(2 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Consumer Protection (Double Charging) Bill 2021-22 View all Consumer Protection (Double Charging) Bill 2021-22 Debates Read Hansard Text

A Ten Minute Rule Bill is a First Reading of a Private Members Bill, but with the sponsor permitted to make a ten minute speech outlining the reasons for the proposed legislation.

There is little chance of the Bill proceeding further unless there is unanimous consent for the Bill or the Government elects to support the Bill directly.

For more information see: Ten Minute Bills

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Afzal Khan Portrait Afzal Khan (Manchester, Gorton) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. The shocking and serious allegation made by the hon. Member for Wealden (Ms Ghani) reminds us that the Conservative Government continue to ignore the blatant Islamophobia in their own ranks. I wrote to the Prime Minister urging him to better safeguard British Muslims and fulfil his promise to carry out an independent investigation into the Conservative party; it took him more than a year to respond. I was then promised a full response from the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities; it has been two months and I still have not received one. I understand that the Government have been busy with parties—sorry, I mean meetings—but is it in order for Ministers to continue to ignore correspondence on such a serious matter as Islamophobia?

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving notice of his point of order. Ministers should reply to correspondence in a timely manner; I do hope that the hon. Gentleman receives a full reply to his correspondence quickly. I know that Ministers on the Front Bench will have heard his point of order and my response, and I trust that they will take steps to make sure that a reply is sent soon.

Judicial Review and Courts Bill (Programme) (No. 2)

Ordered,

That the Order of 26 October 2021 (Judicial Review and Courts Bill (Programme)) be varied as follows:

1. Paragraphs (4) and (5) of the Order shall be omitted.

2. Proceedings on Consideration—

(a) shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following Table, and

(b) shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the times specified in the second column of the Table.

Proceedings

Time for conclusion of proceedings

New Clauses and new Schedules relating to judicial review, new Clauses and new Schedules relating to coroners, amendments of Part 1 and amendments of Chapter 4 of Part 2.

4.00 pm at today’s sitting.

Remaining proceedings on Consideration.

6.00 pm at today’s sitting.





3. Proceedings on Third Reading shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the moment of interruption at today’s sitting.—(Amanda Solloway.)

Points of Order

Debate between Afzal Khan and Rosie Winterton
1st reading: House of Commons
Wednesday 9th May 2018

(5 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Plastics Bill 2017-19 View all Plastics Bill 2017-19 Debates Read Hansard Text
Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have not received any notification that the Secretary of State is about to make an appearance but, again, I am sure that those on the Treasury Bench will have heard the right hon. Gentleman’s concerns, and I am absolutely convinced that he will find ways of raising them with Ministers directly.

Afzal Khan Portrait Afzal Khan (Manchester, Gorton) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. The Committee to consider my Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill met this morning, but it could not consider any clauses as they all require a money resolution. During the sitting, the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, the hon. Member for Norwich North (Chloe Smith) made it clear that the Government had no intention of bringing one forward. She said, “It would not be appropriate to proceed with the Bill at this time by providing it with a money resolution. The Government will keep this Bill under review, but we believe it is right that we allow the Boundary Commission to report its recommendations before carefully considering how to proceed.”

Members gave the Bill its Second Reading almost unanimously—by 229 votes to 44—but it appears that the Government are trying to frustrate the will of the House and circumvent democracy by preventing the Bill’s consideration in Committee. What is the best way to ensure that the Government table a money resolution before the Committee next meets on Monday?

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving me notice that he intended to raise this matter. When to bring forward a money resolution is in the hands of the Government. I appreciate that on this particular occasion the situation is rather unsatisfactory for the hon. Gentleman. I suggest that he encourages his Front-Bench colleagues to pursue this matter through the usual channels, and he might also raise it himself at business questions on Thursday.

Bill Presented

Plastics Bill

Presentation and First Reading (Standing Order No. 57)

Geraint Davies, supported by Zac Goldsmith, John Mc Nally, Layla Moran, Mary Creagh, Steve Double, Chris Williamson, Mr Alistair Carmichael, Yasmin Qureshi, Daniel Zeichner, Susan Elan Jones and Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, presented a Bill to require the Secretary of State to set, measure, enforce and report on targets for the reduction and recycling of plastic packaging; to require that such targets following the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union at least match such targets set by the European Union; to establish enforcement mechanisms in respect of such targets and associated provisions; to make provision for support for the development of sustainable alternatives to plastic packaging; and for connected purposes.

Bill read the First time; to be read a Second time on Friday 15 June, and to be printed (Bill 207).