Information between 18th March 2026 - 28th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Mar 2026 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 19 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 98 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Employment Rights: Investigatory Powers - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 368 Noes - 107 |
|
18 Mar 2026 - Student Loans - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 266 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 161 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 164 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 149 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 162 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Defence - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 306 |
|
24 Mar 2026 - Oil and Gas - View Vote Context Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 297 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Royal Mail: Labour Turnover
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Thursday 19th March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department has made an assessment of trends in the level of workforce retention at Royal Mail since 2022. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) I have been clear that Royal Mail’s recent delivery performance has not been good enough. Workforce retention plays an important role in quality of service, as Royal Mail has said itself in the past in response to Ofcom investigations.
I met Ofcom on 11 March and raised concerns about Royal Mail’s quality of service. Ofcom is explicit that Royal Mail must publish and deliver a credible improvement plan that results in significant and continuous progress. Royal Mail has committed to do so as soon as possible after its discussions with the Communication Workers’ Union conclude. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pupils: Food Poverty
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment she has made of the potential impact of trends in the prevalence of child morning hunger in (a) early years, (b) primary and (c) secondary school settings in England on school (i) readiness and (ii) attendance. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department appreciates the publication of the report and look forward to giving it our full consideration. This government is committed to tackling child poverty and delivering meaningful action to support children and families. The removal of the two child limit on Universal Credit will lift 450,000 children out of poverty, rising to around 550,000 alongside other measures set out in our Child Poverty Strategy, such as the expansion of free school meals. These interventions will lead to the largest expected reduction in child poverty over a Parliament since comparable records began. We recognise the importance of a healthy breakfast at the start of the day for pupils and the impact this can have on attendance and readiness to learn. This is why we are rolling out free breakfast clubs in every state-funded school with primary-aged pupils in England, so that all children can have the best start in life. Since April 2025, the programme has delivered seven million meals to almost 180,000 pupils across the country. We are investing a further £80 million to fund approximately 2,000 additional schools between April 2026 and March 2027. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Royal Mail: Conditions of Employment and Pay
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he has had discussions with the Communication Workers Union and Royal Mail on proposals to equalise pay, terms and conditions between existing and newly recruited postal workers. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Secretary of State met Dave Ward, General Secretary of the CWU, and Daniel Křetínský, the owner of EP Group, on 16 February and again on 19 March. The terms and working conditions of Royal Mail employees are the subject of ongoing negotiations between Royal Mail’s management and the Communication Workers’ Union as part of an agreed dispute resolution process. The government is taking a close interest in these negotiations and receives regular updates. However, the implementation of operational models and terms and conditions of employment, are for Royal Mail, as an independent business, to manage in collaboration with its workforce and their representatives. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chevening Scholarships Programme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, if she will provide a breakdown of the number people in the UK on Chevening scholarships in each of the last ten years by nationality. Answered by Chris Elmore - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) I thank the Hon Member for his question. I will deposit in the library the full requested breakdown of Chevening scholarships by year and by country, but as a summary of the top-line findings, the table below sets out the top 20 countries for scholarships over the period 2015-25.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sleeping Rough: Temperature
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department is taking to help ensure that local authorities have the resources to activate the Severe Weather Emergency Protocol promptly and provide sufficient safe accommodation during periods of extreme cold. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Local authorities should plan services which meet the needs of people in their area, which includes planning for periods of extreme cold. The government is providing more than £3.3 billion in homelessness and rough sleeping funding from 2026/27 to 2028/29 through the Local Government Finance Settlement, and councils can use this and their wider settlement to plan and deliver safe accommodation during periods of extreme weather. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asylum: Housing
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of current move‑on and eviction notice periods from asylum accommodation on refugee homelessness. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) For individuals granted leave to remain, we are committed to successfully transitioning them from asylum accommodation, which is why we have extended the grace period to 42 days, from 28 days. In limited circumstances, the 42 day period can be extended on a discretionary basis. Information on extensions can be found in published guidance on GOV.UK here: www.gov.uk/government/publications/ceasing-asylum-support-instruction In reaching this position, a range of evidence, including key findings from a 56-day pilot evaluation, operational data, and forecasted impacts on the asylum accommodation estate were considered. The Home Office will continue to work closely with our partners to reduce barriers and support effective transitions from asylum accommodation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Energy: Standards
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what discussions he has had with energy providers, including Bunch Energy, on improving customer services. Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Government takes the issue of the quality of customer service offered by suppliers very seriously. The Supplier Licence conditions set down by the industry regulator Ofgem require suppliers to meet certain conditions with respect of customer enquiries. These include offering a range of methods to meet the needs of customers, and be available to receive enquiries and offer assistance, guidance, or advice at times that meet the needs of customers.
My Rt. Hon. Friend the Secretary of State has regular meetings with stakeholders on a range of issues. Details of Ministers' and Permanent Secretaries' meetings with external individuals and organisations are published quarterly in arrears on GOV.UK. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asylum: Sponsorship
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to her written statement of 2 March 2026 on Asylum changes, by what date her department intends to have operationalised a Named Community Sponsorship scheme for refugee resettlement. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) In the Restoring Order and Control policy statement, the Government committed to transforming its approach to safe and legal routes. This included the creation of a named sponsorship scheme to enable community groups to sponsor refugees and displaced persons. Work is underway to deliver the named community sponsorship route. Further details, including timeframes for the launch of the route and the volume of beneficiaries, will be set out in due course. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asylum: Sponsorship
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to her written statement of 2 March 2026 on Asylum changes, what assessment her department has made of the adequacy of the timeline for establishing a Named Community Sponsorship scheme. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) In the Restoring Order and Control policy statement, the Government committed to transforming its approach to safe and legal routes. This included the creation of a named sponsorship scheme to enable community groups to sponsor refugees and displaced persons. Work is underway to deliver the named community sponsorship route. Further details, including timeframes for the launch of the route and the volume of beneficiaries, will be set out in due course. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asylum: Sponsorship
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to her written statement of 2 March 2026 on Asylum changes, what the target number of resettlements is under a Named Community Sponsorship scheme. Answered by Alex Norris - Minister of State (Home Office) In the Restoring Order and Control policy statement, the Government committed to transforming its approach to safe and legal routes. This included the creation of a named sponsorship scheme to enable community groups to sponsor refugees and displaced persons. Work is underway to deliver the named community sponsorship route. Further details, including timeframes for the launch of the route and the volume of beneficiaries, will be set out in due course. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Veterinary Services: VAT
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to review VAT on veterinary services. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the 20 per cent standard rate applies to most goods and services. Tax breaks reduce the revenue available for public services, and must represent value for money for the taxpayer.
Exceptions to the standard rate have always been limited and balanced against affordability considerations.
One of the key considerations for any potential new VAT relief is whether the cost saving is likely to be passed on to consumers. Evidence suggests that businesses only partially pass on any savings from lower VAT rates, meaning that cutting VAT may not be an effective way to reduce prices for consumers.
The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the overall public finances. Since taking office the Government has taken a number of decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to fix the public finances, fund public services, and restore economic stability. This stability is critical to boosting investment and growth, and to making people across the UK better off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Veterinary Services: VAT
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of applying a (a) reduced and (b) zero rate of VAT to essential veterinary (i) treatment and (ii) medicines. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the 20 per cent standard rate applies to most goods and services. Tax breaks reduce the revenue available for public services, and must represent value for money for the taxpayer.
Exceptions to the standard rate have always been limited and balanced against affordability considerations.
One of the key considerations for any potential new VAT relief is whether the cost saving is likely to be passed on to consumers. Evidence suggests that businesses only partially pass on any savings from lower VAT rates, meaning that cutting VAT may not be an effective way to reduce prices for consumers.
The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the overall public finances. Since taking office the Government has taken a number of decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to fix the public finances, fund public services, and restore economic stability. This stability is critical to boosting investment and growth, and to making people across the UK better off. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Higher Education: Research
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to support early-career researchers funded through the Science and Technology Facilities Council, in the context of funding uncertainty. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.
The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.
DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Science and Technology Facilities Council: Finance
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to STFC funding on (a) the Jodrell Bank Observatory and (b) other research facilities. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.
The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.
DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Astronomy and Physics: Research
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to Science and Technology Facilities Council funding on the UK’s global position in astronomy and physics research. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.
The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.
DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many Muslim organisations have applied for funding through the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme in every year since it was established; and of these, how many have been successful in obtaining funding. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) The Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme is open to places of worship from all faith communities, except for Muslim and Jewish sites, which are supported through separate schemes. Muslim organisations are therefore not eligible for the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme. Instead, mosques and their associated faith community centres can access protective security measures through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme. However, between 2016 and the launch of the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in 2023, Muslim communities were eligible to apply to the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme. To protect the integrity of the scheme and ensure the continued safety of vulnerable sites, the Home Office does not publish data on processing of applications or the specific offers made to individual sites. Releasing this information could inadvertently disclose sensitive details about faith communities and their security arrangements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps her Department is taking to ensure local and regional government leaders have sufficient information about the Better Futures Fund application process ahead of the Summer 2026 bidding round opening. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners. DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process. Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what engagement her Department plans to undertake with local and regional government leaders ahead of the Summer 2026 Better Futures Fund bidding round to maximise the quality and diversity of applications received. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners. DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process. Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, when her Department plans to publish eligibility criteria and target outcomes for the first phase of the Better Futures Fund so that local authorities can begin preparing applications in good time. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners. DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process. Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026 2 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 2 p.m. Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill At 2:15pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP - Secretary of State for Northern Ireland at Northern Ireland Office View calendar - Add to calendar |