Afzal Khan Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Afzal Khan

Information between 18th October 2026 - 28th October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279


Written Answers
Sugar: Labelling
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of requiring business to list free sugars separately to total sugars on nutritional information labels for food and drink products.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

No such assessment has been made. ‘Free sugars’ are rightly presented as part of the total sugar content for each product, given there is no distinction regarding their health impact.

Social Media: Harassment
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to reduce the number of anonymous, software-controlled ‘bot’ accounts spreading hateful messages on social media platforms.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

The Government recognises the harm posed by bot-produced content online. The Online Safety Act requires social media platforms to tackle illegal content and activity on their services, including state-backed coordinated inauthentic activity where it meets the conditions of the Foreign Interference Offence.

Under the Online Safety Act, the largest platforms will be required to apply their terms of service consistently, including where these prohibit inauthentic activity. These services will also be required to offer adult users identity verification and tools enabling them to limit their exposure to content from non-verified users. We expect these additional duties to come into force in 2027.

Intimate Image Abuse
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of taking legislative steps to prohibit non-consensual intimate audio-recordings.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

There is a lack of consensus about what constitutes ‘intimate audio’ as a concept. However, depending on the circumstances, this type of abuse may already fall within a number of existing offences where audio recordings are used to harass or blackmail. Communications offences may also apply.

The Government routinely keeps the criminal law under review. We recognise the concerns about intimate audio abuse and will continue to engage with law enforcement agencies and third sector groups to better understand the nature of the problem and any challenges in addressing it.

Social Media: Proof of Identity
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of making identity verification mandatory for owning a social media account.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

The Government recognises the benefits of identity verification, but this must be balanced with legitimate reasons for anonymity. That is why the Government's focus is on ensuring platforms provide effective tools to help users manage the risks they face online.

The Online Safety Act requires the largest user-to-user services to offer tools to verify identity and filter content from anonymous users. These additional duties are expected to come into force in 2027.

Intimate Image Abuse
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of powers available to sentence perpetrators who abuse victims through the dissemination of non-consensual intimate audio recordings.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

There is a lack of consensus about what constitutes ‘intimate audio’ as a concept. However, depending on the circumstances, this type of abuse may already fall within a number of existing offences where audio recordings are used to harass or blackmail. Communications offences may also apply.

The Government routinely keeps the criminal law under review. We recognise the concerns about intimate audio abuse and will continue to engage with law enforcement agencies and third sector groups to better understand the nature of the problem and any challenges in addressing it.

Intimate Image Abuse: Victims
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to protect victims of abuse relating to non-consensual intimate audio recordings from further abuse and dissemination of such recordings.

Answered by Alex Davies-Jones - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

There is a lack of consensus about what constitutes ‘intimate audio’ as a concept. However, depending on the circumstances, this type of abuse may already fall within a number of existing offences where audio recordings are used to harass or blackmail. Communications offences may also apply.

The Government routinely keeps the criminal law under review. We recognise the concerns about intimate audio abuse and will continue to engage with law enforcement agencies and third sector groups to better understand the nature of the problem and any challenges in addressing it.

Social Media: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to the Online Safety Act 2023, what steps she is taking to encourage social media companies to remove content depicting serious violence against animals.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

The government takes online animal cruelty content extremely seriously. Under the Online Safety Act 2023, platforms must remove illegal content swiftly, including material promoting or facilitating animal cruelty, which is a designated priority offence. Services must also implement systems and processes to protect children from harmful depictions of animal cruelty, even where it is not illegal. Ofcom, as the independent regulator, enforces these duties and can take action, including issuing fines, where platforms fail to comply.

Overseas Students: Student Numbers
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate she has made of the potential fiscal impact of the 12% decline in international student numbers since 2022/23.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

Estimates indicate that the tuition fees and living expenditure from non-UK higher education students generated £23.9 billion in UK export revenue in 2024.

Transnational education revenue rose by 17.1%, from £3.1 billion in 2023 to £3.6 billion in 2024.

The data is available at: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/uk-revenue-from-education-related-exports-and-transnational-education-activity/2024#dataBlock-9f02d54f-d5cf-4348-af23-2e38e9e05482-charts.

Academic Freedom
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent discussions she has had with universities regarding upholding free speech on campus.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

My noble Friend, the Minister for Skills, and departmental officials have met higher education providers and representative bodies on a number of occasions to discuss the importance of protecting freedom of speech and academic freedom on campus.

These discussions have included implementation of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, the commencement of key provisions and the introduction of the Office for Students' free speech complaints scheme.

Overseas Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the economic case for the International Student Levy.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The government has consulted on the proposed design and delivery of the international student levy and published its response on 13 July 2026. An impact analysis for the levy was published at the 2025 Autumn Budget and an updated analysis will be published shortly.

The funding raised through the levy on providers will be fully reinvested in England’s higher education and skills system. It will fund maintenance grants for students, support progression through the post-16 system and support wider skills.

We have also announced increases to tuition fee caps in line with forecast inflation. Over the next 5 years, raising tuition fees by inflation could generate around £6 billion for higher education providers. This significantly exceeds the projected levy cost to providers of less than £1 billion over the same period. Compounding annual increases will provide the sector with growing resources to support high-quality education and innovation.

Teachers: Health
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to improve the wellbeing of teachers during Ofsted inspections.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

Inspection and accountability are essential to ensuring every child receives a high-quality education. However, this should not come at the expense of teacher and headteacher wellbeing, which we take incredibly seriously.

The department is working with Ofsted and sector leaders to ensure accountability is collaborative, proportionate and fair, while remaining focused on delivering the best outcomes for children.




Afzal Khan - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 11th November 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: Legislative Scrutiny: Immigration and Asylum Bill
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
Eleanor Lyons - Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner at Independent Anti-slavery Commissioner
Eleonora Fais - Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group Coordinator at Anti-slavery International
Professor Parosha Chandran - Barrister at One Pump Court
At 3:15pm: Oral evidence
Christa Rottensteiner - Chief of Mission at International Organization for Migration (IOM)
Vicky Tennant - UNHCR Representative to the United Kingdom at UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
Dr Patrick Burland - Senior Project and Policy Officer at International Organization for Migration (IOM)
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th November 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 28th October 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
Liz Webster - Founder at Save British Farming
Peter Leary - Deputy Director at Palestine Solidarity Campaign
Rahila Gupta - Trustee at Southall Black Sisters
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 18th November 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Save British Farming, Palestine Solidarity Campaign, and Southall Black Sisters

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Written Evidence - Jewish Leadership Council
SSP0038 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Written Evidence - University of Bristol, University of Bristol, University of Bristol, and University of Bristol
SSP0032 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Written Evidence - Aston University, University of Birmingham, and University of York
SSP0019 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Written Evidence - Palestine Solidarity Campaign
SSP0054 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 4th November 2026
Written Evidence - Independent Anti-slavery Commissioner
IAB0029 - Legislative Scrutiny: Immigration and Asylum Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 21st October 2026
Oral Evidence - JUSTICE, and Garden Court Chambers

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 21st October 2026
Oral Evidence - Immigration and Asylum Chamber, Refugee Law Initiative, School of Advanced Study University of London, and Refugee Council

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 19th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence to Chief Constable Tim Smith KPM, Kent police regarding the Dover protests, 19 October 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Bounce Black
SSP0018 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Swansea University
SSP0037 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Kernow Rydh
SSP0024 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Hayes
SSP0025 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - The Runnymede Trust
SSP0017 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Queen Mary University of London, United Nations, and University of Southampton
SSP0028 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - University of Hull
SSP0029 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Friends of Al-Aqsa
SSP0020 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Universities of Hokkaido, Bristol & Bangor
SSP0030 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - National Police Chiefs Council
SSP0059 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol)
SSP0026 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - University of Glasgow, and Old Catholic Apostolic Church
SSP0010 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Mr Andrew Marston
SSP0014 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Independent Reviewer of Terrorism and State Threat Legislation
SSP0007 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - The William Gomes podcast
SSP0006 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - Cheong Lam
SSP0004 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Written Evidence - FairGo CIC
SSP0002 - Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 21st October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Committee to Chief Constable Alexis Boon QPM, relating to Protests in Hampshire, September and October, dated 21 October

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Declarations of interest - Lord's Declarations of Interest: Immigration and Asylum Bill

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 22nd October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence to Assistant Chief Constable Jones, regarding Protests in Kent and Hampshire, 22 October 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)