Afzal Khan Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Afzal Khan

Information between 26th March 2026 - 15th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Afzal Khan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176


Speeches
Afzal Khan speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Afzal Khan contributed 2 speeches (107 words)
Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Afzal Khan speeches from: Middle East
Afzal Khan contributed 1 speech (93 words)
Monday 13th April 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Veterinary Services: VAT
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she plans to review VAT on veterinary services.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the 20 per cent standard rate applies to most goods and services. Tax breaks reduce the revenue available for public services, and must represent value for money for the taxpayer.

Exceptions to the standard rate have always been limited and balanced against affordability considerations.

One of the key considerations for any potential new VAT relief is whether the cost saving is likely to be passed on to consumers. Evidence suggests that businesses only partially pass on any savings from lower VAT rates, meaning that cutting VAT may not be an effective way to reduce prices for consumers.

The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the overall public finances. Since taking office the Government has taken a number of decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to fix the public finances, fund public services, and restore economic stability. This stability is critical to boosting investment and growth, and to making people across the UK better off.

Veterinary Services: VAT
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Thursday 26th March 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of applying a (a) reduced and (b) zero rate of VAT to essential veterinary (i) treatment and (ii) medicines.

Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the 20 per cent standard rate applies to most goods and services. Tax breaks reduce the revenue available for public services, and must represent value for money for the taxpayer.

Exceptions to the standard rate have always been limited and balanced against affordability considerations.

One of the key considerations for any potential new VAT relief is whether the cost saving is likely to be passed on to consumers. Evidence suggests that businesses only partially pass on any savings from lower VAT rates, meaning that cutting VAT may not be an effective way to reduce prices for consumers.

The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events in the context of the overall public finances. Since taking office the Government has taken a number of decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to fix the public finances, fund public services, and restore economic stability. This stability is critical to boosting investment and growth, and to making people across the UK better off.

Higher Education: Research
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to support early-career researchers funded through the Science and Technology Facilities Council, in the context of funding uncertainty.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.

The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.

DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing.

Science and Technology Facilities Council: Finance
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to STFC funding on (a) the Jodrell Bank Observatory and (b) other research facilities.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.

The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.

DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing.

Astronomy and Physics: Research
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of changes to Science and Technology Facilities Council funding on the UK’s global position in astronomy and physics research.

Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed a record £58.5 billion investment in R&D over the next 4 years. This includes £38.6 billion allocated to UKRI. The overall Government spend on R&D over the next 4 years is £86 billion.

The Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) within UKRI has a flat budget across this period and is currently working with the sector to model different spending scenarios for its overall portfolio including in particle physics, astronomy and nuclear physics (PPAN). The impacts of different modelled scenarios across the broad and diverse range of STFC-funded facilities and programmes (which includes the Jodrell Bank Observatory), will be considered alongside feedback from the sector when taking final decisions. The current level of post-doctoral researchers and flow of PhD students will be maintained across the SR period.

DSIT has asked UKRI to ensure that its specific investment decisions are informed by meaningful engagement with the scientific research community and a robust assessment of potential consequences for the UK’s scientific capability, research institutions and international standing.

Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many Muslim organisations have applied for funding through the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme in every year since it was established; and of these, how many have been successful in obtaining funding.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme is open to places of worship from all faith communities, except for Muslim and Jewish sites, which are supported through separate schemes. Muslim organisations are therefore not eligible for the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme. Instead, mosques and their associated faith community centres can access protective security measures through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme.

However, between 2016 and the launch of the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in 2023, Muslim communities were eligible to apply to the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme.

To protect the integrity of the scheme and ensure the continued safety of vulnerable sites, the Home Office does not publish data on processing of applications or the specific offers made to individual sites. Releasing this information could inadvertently disclose sensitive details about faith communities and their security arrangements.

Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps her Department is taking to ensure local and regional government leaders have sufficient information about the Better Futures Fund application process ahead of the Summer 2026 bidding round opening.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners.

DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process.

Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships.

Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what engagement her Department plans to undertake with local and regional government leaders ahead of the Summer 2026 Better Futures Fund bidding round to maximise the quality and diversity of applications received.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners.

DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process.

Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships.

Better Futures Fund
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Friday 27th March 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, when her Department plans to publish eligibility criteria and target outcomes for the first phase of the Better Futures Fund so that local authorities can begin preparing applications in good time.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

DCMS is currently in the design stages of the Better Futures Fund and is currently in dialogue with Mayoral Strategic Authorities to assess their capacity for participation in delivery. DCMS intends to launch a dedicated capacity and capability building programme in the autumn this year, that will include ongoing support and information for regional and local commissioners.

DCMS intends to publish eligibility criteria alongside an invitation to bidders in Summer 2026. This will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. The bidding will target projects and commissioners that are able to launch quickly, with a commensurate application process.

Round 1 bids will be aimed at projects where all partners have a track record of successful social outcomes partnership delivery. DCMS will ensure that appropriate information sharing and engagement is included in the application process, but anticipates working with commissioners with good foreknowledge of social outcomes partnerships.

Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 31st March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the average length of time for applications to the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme to be determined since that Scheme was established.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Protective Security for Mosques Scheme receives a high volume of applications, and each is assessed to ensure that public money is used proportionately, fairly, and in line with the Scheme’s eligibility requirements.

Processing times can vary depending on application volumes and the circumstances of individual sites. As such, the Home Office does not hold a published estimate of the average length of time for applications to be determined since the Scheme was established.

We continue to work to improve the consistency and timeliness of decisions while ensuring that assessments remain proportionate and aligned with value‑for‑money considerations.

Places of Worship Security Funding Scheme and Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 31st March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how much funding was provided to Muslim institutions through the (a) Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme and (b) Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in each year since they were established.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Home Office provides protective security for Places of Worship as part of three separate strands. These are the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme and protection for Muslim faith schools (since 2023/24), the Jewish Community Protective Security Grant (administered by the Community Security Trust) and the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme (for all other, non-Muslim and non-Jewish, faiths). Prior to 2023/24, the Muslim community were eligible for support under the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme.

No funding is provided directly from the Home Office to any place of worship, instead they receive protective security measures funded by the Home Office via contracts or grants.

Since the launch of the Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme and the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme, up to the following amounts have been made available.

Protective Security for Mosques Scheme and Muslim Faith Schools

Places of Worship Protective Security Scheme

2019/20

N/A

£1.6 million

2020/21

N/A

£3.2 million

2021/22

N/A

£3.5 million

2022/23

N/A

£3.5 million

2023/24

£29.4 million

£3.5 million

2024/25

£29.4 million

£3.5 million

2025/26

£39.4 million

£3.5 million

In 2026/27, record funding of up to £73.4 million is being made available to protect faith communities. This includes £40 million through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme and for security at Muslim faith schools, and £5 million for the places of worship and associated faith community centres of all other faiths.

Mosques: Security
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 31st March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate she has made of the average length of time for security measures to be implemented following funding being approved through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

The Protective Security for Mosques Scheme provides fully funded protective security measures to eligible mosques and associated community centres across the UK.

Implementation timelines under the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme can vary, as they are influenced by a range of operational and site‑specific factors. Once a site has been approved, it is referred to our delivery partners for the necessary survey and subsequent installation activity.

In some cases, additional steps may be required before installation can proceed, such as local planning permission or the production of bespoke security equipment tailored to the site. These elements, which sit outside the Home Office’s direct control, can contribute to longer timeframes.

West Bank: Archaeological Sites
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Thursday 2nd April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether she has had discussions with Israeli ministers about the annexation of Sebastia in the West Bank.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

I refer the Hon. Member to response given on 24 March to question 120656.

Protective Security for Mosques Scheme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many organisations have applied for funding through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in every year since it was established; and of these, how many have been successful in obtaining funding.

Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Cabinet Office)

Protecting the right of all faith communities to worship in peace and without fear is fundamental. The Government continues to support the police in reviewing threats and strengthening protections for faith communities against terrorism and hate crime.

That is why up to £40 million is available through the Protective Security for Mosques Scheme in 2026/27. This includes additional funding announced by the Prime Minister of £10 million to further strengthen security at mosques and other Muslim community sites. The scheme provides protective security measures (such as security personnel services, CCTV, intruder alarms and secure perimeter fencing) to mosques, Muslim faith schools and associated Muslim faith community centres.

To protect the integrity of the scheme and ensure the continued safety of vulnerable sites, the Home Office does not publish data on processing of applications or the specific offers made to individual sites. Releasing this information could inadvertently disclose sensitive details about faith communities and their security arrangements.

Religious Buildings: Crimes against Property
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many mosques, Islamic centres and Muslim community centres have been subject to criminal damage in each of the last 5 years.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Home Office collects and publishes information on the number of religious hate crimes targeted at Muslims recorded by the police in England and Wales. It is not possible to tell, from the data held centrally, whether or not the offences were committed against mosques, Islamic centres or Muslim community centres.

The latest published statistics are available here: Hate crime, England and Wales, year ending March 2025 - GOV.UK

Syria: Reconstruction
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps she is taking to help support the inclusion of Syrian youth and women in post-conflict reconstruction and decision-making processes including funding for locally-led initiatives and civic empowerment programmes.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long recognised the importance of education for Syria's long-term resilience, stability and prosperity. Since 2022, the UK's Syria Education Programme has trained over 15,000 school staff and provided foundational literacy and numeracy materials to primary school children in Idlib and Aleppo. In the past year, the UK has funded the rehabilitation of 90 schools in Idlib and Aleppo and provided £2.5 million to UNICEF for school rehabilitation across the country.

The UK also places the inclusion of women and girls at the centre of its approach to Syria's recovery. Syria is a priority country under the UK's National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security and we are supporting agricultural livelihoods, vocational training and entrepreneurship opportunities with a focus on young people, female-headed households and conflict‑affected communities in economically marginalised regions.

The UK's Global Mine Action Programme is supporting mine clearance and livelihoods programming in North East Syria and our Syria Education Programme provides safety information to children in Idlib and Aleppo, promoting safe behaviours and encouraging the reporting of suspicious or hazardous objects.

Syria: Reconstruction
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps she is taking to support employment, vocational training, and entrepreneurship opportunities for young people in Syria, particularly in areas affected by conflict and sanctions.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long recognised the importance of education for Syria's long-term resilience, stability and prosperity. Since 2022, the UK's Syria Education Programme has trained over 15,000 school staff and provided foundational literacy and numeracy materials to primary school children in Idlib and Aleppo. In the past year, the UK has funded the rehabilitation of 90 schools in Idlib and Aleppo and provided £2.5 million to UNICEF for school rehabilitation across the country.

The UK also places the inclusion of women and girls at the centre of its approach to Syria's recovery. Syria is a priority country under the UK's National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security and we are supporting agricultural livelihoods, vocational training and entrepreneurship opportunities with a focus on young people, female-headed households and conflict‑affected communities in economically marginalised regions.

The UK's Global Mine Action Programme is supporting mine clearance and livelihoods programming in North East Syria and our Syria Education Programme provides safety information to children in Idlib and Aleppo, promoting safe behaviours and encouraging the reporting of suspicious or hazardous objects.

Syria: Reconstruction
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what steps she is taking to support the rebuilding of schools, the training of teachers, and the provision of learning materials in Syria.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long recognised the importance of education for Syria's long-term resilience, stability and prosperity. Since 2022, the UK's Syria Education Programme has trained over 15,000 school staff and provided foundational literacy and numeracy materials to primary school children in Idlib and Aleppo. In the past year, the UK has funded the rehabilitation of 90 schools in Idlib and Aleppo and provided £2.5 million to UNICEF for school rehabilitation across the country.

The UK also places the inclusion of women and girls at the centre of its approach to Syria's recovery. Syria is a priority country under the UK's National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security and we are supporting agricultural livelihoods, vocational training and entrepreneurship opportunities with a focus on young people, female-headed households and conflict‑affected communities in economically marginalised regions.

The UK's Global Mine Action Programme is supporting mine clearance and livelihoods programming in North East Syria and our Syria Education Programme provides safety information to children in Idlib and Aleppo, promoting safe behaviours and encouraging the reporting of suspicious or hazardous objects.

Syria: Reconstruction
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, what action she is taking to support mine clearance, risk education, and safe access to schools, agricultural land, and residential areas in Syria.

Answered by Hamish Falconer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The UK has long recognised the importance of education for Syria's long-term resilience, stability and prosperity. Since 2022, the UK's Syria Education Programme has trained over 15,000 school staff and provided foundational literacy and numeracy materials to primary school children in Idlib and Aleppo. In the past year, the UK has funded the rehabilitation of 90 schools in Idlib and Aleppo and provided £2.5 million to UNICEF for school rehabilitation across the country.

The UK also places the inclusion of women and girls at the centre of its approach to Syria's recovery. Syria is a priority country under the UK's National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security and we are supporting agricultural livelihoods, vocational training and entrepreneurship opportunities with a focus on young people, female-headed households and conflict‑affected communities in economically marginalised regions.

The UK's Global Mine Action Programme is supporting mine clearance and livelihoods programming in North East Syria and our Syria Education Programme provides safety information to children in Idlib and Aleppo, promoting safe behaviours and encouraging the reporting of suspicious or hazardous objects.

Food: Retail Trade
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the impact of market concentration in the food retail industry on (a) consumers and (b) suppliers.

Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) provided an updated assessment of retail competition and profitability in July 2024 which did not find that groceries inflation was being driven at an aggregate level by weak competition between retailers. There was overall growth in revenues, profits, and margins for retailers in the 2023/24 financial year. However, operating profits and margins remained broadly at or below financial years 2019/20 to 2021/22 level.

The CMA’s November 2024 analysis of supermarket loyalty pricing also found limited evidence of price changes which could indicate that supermarkets may have inflated prices to make their loyalty prices appear misleadingly attractive.

Supermarkets relations with suppliers are guided by the Groceries Supply Code of Practice. This imposes various obligations on the largest retailers such as dealing fairly and lawfully with suppliers, not varying supply agreements retrospectively, and providing reasonable notice of any significant changes to supply chain procedures.

Africa and Asia: Chevening Scholarships Programme
Asked by: Afzal Khan (Labour - Manchester Rusholme)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, how many people did her department sponsor Chevening scholarships for from (a) Sudan, (b) Cameroon, (c) Myanmar and (d) Afghanistan in each of the last ten years.

Answered by Chris Elmore - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

The table below provides the number of Chevening Scholarships awarded to individuals from Sudan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Afghanistan in the last ten years.

Country

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Afghanistan

18

15

14

15

23

29

18

21

13

10

Cameroon

18

16

13

15

12

10

5

8

8

8

Myanmar

12

15

15

12

9

16

8

10

10

14

Sudan

12

13

12

16

17

18

17

17

16

10




Afzal Khan mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

13 Apr 2026, 4:08 p.m. - House of Commons
" Afzal Khan thank. "
Afzal Khan MP (Manchester Rusholme, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
14 Apr 2026, 12:01 p.m. - House of Commons
" Afzal Khan thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Health Secretary has "
Afzal Khan MP (Manchester Rusholme, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript



Afzal Khan - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 15th April 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: Security, safety and protest: the role of Human Rights
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
Paul Parker - Recording Clerk at Quakers in Britain
Akiko Hart - Director at Liberty
Raj Chada - Partner and Head of Crime, Financial and Regulatory Department at Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors
Sir Andy Cooke - former HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary and HM Chief Inspector at Fire and Rescue Services
At 3:15pm: Oral evidence
Prof Katrina Navickas - Professor of History at University of Hertfordshire
Prof Geoff Pearson - Professor of Law at University of Manchester
Dr Richard Martin - Associate Professor of Law at LSE
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 22nd April 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
The Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP - Secretary of State for Northern Ireland at Northern Ireland Office
Sharon Carter - Deputy Director, Legacy at Northern Ireland Office
Philip Shaw - NIO Legal Advisor at Northern Ireland Office Legal Advisors
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 20th May 2026 2 p.m.
Human Rights (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence
Subject: The work of the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
At 2:15pm: Oral evidence
Rt Hon David Lammy MP - Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State at Ministry of Justice
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 31st March 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chairs of the Education Committee and the Joint Committee on Human Rights to the Secretary of State for Education, 27 March 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 16th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Kanishka Naranyan MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary for Science, Innovation and Technology, 1 April 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 16th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence to the Home Secretary relating to 'Visa Brake', 16 April 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Thursday 16th April 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Chris Elmore MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary for Multilateral, Human Rights, Latin America and the Caribbean, 7 April 2026

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Bates Wells LLP
RAI0035 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Human Rights Solidarity
RAI0026 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - British Copyright Council
RAI0027 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Justice
RAI0082 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - 5Rights Foundation
RAI0074 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Prison Reform Trust
RAI0041 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Royal Holloway University of London
RAI0010 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Abdullah Dashti
RAI0025 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Henry Jackson Society
RAI0011 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Liberty
RAI0079 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Privacy International
RAI0081 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - University of Southampton
RAI0080 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Liberty
RAI0079 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Privacy International
RAI0081 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Prison Reform Trust
RAI0041 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - British Copyright Council
RAI0027 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - 5Rights Foundation
RAI0074 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - University of Southampton
RAI0080 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Human Rights Solidarity
RAI0026 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Abdullah Dashti
RAI0025 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Henry Jackson Society
RAI0011 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Justice
RAI0082 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Bates Wells LLP
RAI0035 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Quakers in Britain, Liberty, Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors, and Fire and Rescue Services

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Friday 17th April 2026
Written Evidence - Royal Holloway University of London
RAI0010 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Oral Evidence - University of Hertfordshire, University of Manchester, and LSE

Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Monday 27th April 2026
Written Evidence - The Special Air Service Regimental Association (SASRA), the Special Boat Service Association (SBSA), and Special Reconnaissance Regimental Association (SRRA) (“the Associations”)
NITB0019 - Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 22nd April 2026
Oral Evidence - Northern Ireland Office, Northern Ireland Office, and Northern Ireland Office Legal Advisors

Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Written Evidence - Dualarity Ltd
RAI0071 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Written Evidence - Associate - Garden Court Chambers
RAI0019 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Written Evidence - Dr Felipe Romero-Moreno
RAI0087 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Written Evidence - Good Tech Advisory
RAI0086 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Tuesday 28th April 2026
Written Evidence - Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
RAI0085 - Human Rights and the Regulation of AI

Human Rights and the Regulation of AI - Human Rights (Joint Committee)
Wednesday 29th April 2026
Written Evidence - Northern Ireland Veterans Commissioner
NITB0020 - Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill

Legislative Scrutiny: Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - Human Rights (Joint Committee)