To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Civil Partnerships
Saturday 4th March 2017

Asked by: Andy Slaughter (Labour - Hammersmith and Chiswick)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department has agreed a timetable for deciding on the future status of civil partnerships.

Answered by Caroline Dinenage

The Government carried out a consultation on the future of civil partnerships in 2014. Views were invited on three options: abolishing civil partnerships; phasing them out; or extending them to opposite sex couples.

The review found that there was no clear consensus on the future of civil partnerships. A majority of respondents to the consultation were against extending civil partnerships to opposite sex couples and several significant stakeholders thought it was too soon to consider making changes to civil partnerships until the impact of extending marriage to same sex couples is known. Given the lack of any consensus, the Government did not change the Civil Partnership Act 2004.

The decision not to change the law was judicially reviewed last year and the Government won in the High Court. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against the High Court judgment this week and confirmed that the Government’s approach is lawful.

We welcome the Court’s ruling. Before we take any action on this issue, it is right that we evaluate the impact that same sex marriage has on the take-up of civil partnerships. We will also carefully consider this judgment and its implications before deciding on our next steps.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 25 Jan 2017
School Funding

"I make no apology for talking about schools in my constituency, which is the eighth worst affected in the country, while the neighbouring constituency, Chelsea and Fulham, which makes up the rest of the borough, is the seventh worst affected. All 48 schools will lose significant sums, and the borough …..."
Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: School Funding

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 25 Jan 2017
School Funding

"My hon. Friend is right. It constitutes a triumph of ideology over practicality.

Let me quote what has been said by two of the people in my borough who know what they are talking about. The head of the borough’s schools forum, who is also the principal of one of …..."

Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: School Funding

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 25 Jan 2017
School Funding

"I entirely agree. This is a very crude exercise, and it is also a political exercise. I find some of the triumphalism that we have seen on the Conservative Benches extremely objectionable.

Early one morning last year, my neighbour knocked on my door. When I said, “I have got to …..."

Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: School Funding

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 08 Dec 2016
Oral Answers to Questions

"11. If she will discuss with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions the provision of further transitional support to women affected by the increase in the state pension age. ..."
Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 08 Dec 2016
Oral Answers to Questions

"The Minister must know that the lack of transitional support is causing real hardship to women in her constituency, as it is in mine. In the interests of transparency, will she publish any proposals that have come up since the Pensions Act 2011? Will she publish them and the Government’s …..."
Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Department for Education: Social Media
Thursday 24th November 2016

Asked by: Andy Slaughter (Labour - Hammersmith and Chiswick)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department is monitoring content that is publicly available on social networking sites using overt monitoring techniques.

Answered by Caroline Dinenage

The Department’s small social media team within the communications directorate is responsible for the management of the Department’s social media channels. One part of this team’s role includes manually monitoring content that is publicly made available on social media – including our partners, stakeholders, individuals and our own channels. Monitoring can also be undertaken by other members of the Department, such as analysts, digital/web specialists and policy leads.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 04 May 2016
Education Funding in London

"I begin by thanking the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) for helping to secure the debate and for his excellent speech, which managed to define all the issues. It was a shame that the only other speech from the Government Benches was that of the hon. Member …..."
Andy Slaughter - View Speech

View all Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) contributions to the debate on: Education Funding in London

Written Question
Children: Disadvantaged
Thursday 11th February 2016

Asked by: Andy Slaughter (Labour - Hammersmith and Chiswick)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment she has made of the quality of early education and childcare available to disadvantaged children.

Answered by Sam Gyimah

The Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) sets the standards for the provision of learning, development and care for children from birth to age five. The EYFS helps early years providers to prepare young children for school and improve their life chances by delivering high quality early education.

The most recent EYFS Profile results show that the gap between disadvantaged children and their peers has narrowed - 51% of children eligible for free school meals (FSM) achieved a good level of development (GLD) in 2015 compared to 45% in 2014. This is the equivalent of an extra 5,800 children eligible for FSM achieving a GLD.

We want all children, regardless of their starting point, to have access to high quality early education and childcare, as we know this is what makes the difference to outcomes. To help close the gap between disadvantaged children and their better off peers we introduced the early learning programme for two-year-olds in September 2013. Around 160,000 of our most disadvantaged two-year-olds are already benefiting.

We have also introduced the Early Years Pupil Premium, worth £50 million a year. This provides nurseries and schools delivering the early education entitlement with an extra 53p an hour for disadvantaged three and four year olds to help them close the gap in school readiness.


Written Question
Pre-school Education: Standards
Thursday 11th February 2016

Asked by: Andy Slaughter (Labour - Hammersmith and Chiswick)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to improve the quality of early years education.

Answered by Sam Gyimah

The Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) sets the standards for the provision of learning, development and care for children from birth to age five, which all early years providers must follow. All three- and four-year-olds are entitled to 15 hours a week of quality early education, free of charge, to prepare them for school and improve their life chances. 94% of three- and 99% of four-year-olds are taking up the current free entitlement.

The latest Early Years Foundation Stage Profile data reveal that an increasing proportion of children are achieving a good level of development at age five: 66% in 2015, compared to 52% in 2013. This is an impressive increase in the last two years.

The quality of the workforce is key to the quality of early years provision and to the positive outcomes it delivers for children’s long term life chances. In group full day care settings, 87% of the workforce has a relevant qualification at level 3. Many of the workforce are qualified beyond level 3. Since 2007, over 16,000 individuals have achieved Early Years Professional Status and Early Years Teacher Status.

We will continue to grow a high quality workforce to drive improvement across the sector through our Workforce Strategy. The strategy will consider how career progression in the sector can be improved to attract and retain quality staff and how effective continuing professional development can help settings to deliver the best quality provision they can.

The government is committed to supporting parents with high childcare costs and is investing in childcare at record levels. By 2019-20 we will be spending more than £6 billion on early years and childcare. The Childcare Bill is delivering the government’s election manifesto commitment to giving families where parents are working an entitlement to 30 hours of free childcare for their three- and four-year-olds.