To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Mortgages: Interest Rates
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of capping profit margins on standard variable rate mortgages.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Written Question
Mortgages: Interest Rates
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of introducing a moratorium on interest rate rises for those with pre-2008 mortgages in non-lending closed books.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Written Question
Mortgages
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of moving mortgage prisoners’ mortgages to active lenders.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Written Question
Mortgages
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of incorporating closed book mortgages into existing mortgage regulatory frameworks.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Written Question
Mortgages: Interest Rates
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits regulating interest-only mortgage lenders’ adjustment of variable rates.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Written Question
Mortgages
Thursday 27th October 2022

Asked by: Angela Eagle (Labour - Wallasey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether his Department plans to introduce new measures to support mortgage prisoners in response to increases in the (a) base rate and (b) cost of living.

Answered by Andrew Griffith - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) review into mortgage prisoners, published in November 2021, found that there are 47,000 mortgage prisoners who might benefit from switching to a new mortgage deal but are considered too high risk to do so, despite being up to date with payments.

The review makes clear that the reason mortgage prisoners are unable to switch are varied and complex. As such, there is no silver bullet to address the circumstances of this entire population of mortgage holders without being unfair to other borrowers.

The Government has already worked with the FCA to implement changes to its mortgage lending rules, removing the regulatory barrier that prevented some mortgage prisoners, who otherwise may have been able to switch, from accessing new products. These rules should allow customers to switch to an active lender as long as they meet the lender’s risk appetite and certain criteria, such as not looking to borrow more.

Ultimately, the pricing and availability of mortgages is a commercial decision for lenders in which the Government does not intervene. As such, the Government cannot force lenders to lend to borrowers that sit outside of their risk appetite.

Any further work on this issue must consider the impact and practicality of solutions and their effects on the wider mortgage market, including the resilience of firms and fairness to other borrowers. There is no evidence, for instance, that consumers have experienced detriment that would be resolved by an extension of the regulatory perimeter. It is also worth noting that the Standard Variable Rates (SVRs) charged by inactive firms are in line with those paid by borrowers in the active market. The Government remains open to practical and proportionate solutions to help mortgage prisoners that do not pose unacceptable financial stability risks, and are not unfair to other borrowers in the mortgage market.

More broadly, the Government understands that people across the UK are worried about the cost of living. That is why we have announced £37 billion of support for the cost of living this financial year. We have also taken decisive action to support millions of households with rising energy costs this winter through the Energy Price Guarantee and the Energy Bill Relief Scheme. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive £1,200 of support this year, with additional support for pensioners and those claiming disability benefits.

When mortgage borrowers are in financial difficulty and struggling to pay their mortgage, FCA guidance requires firms to provide support through tailored forbearance options. The Government also offers support to borrowers through Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit, and protection in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol.


Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 25 Oct 2022
Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

"As a member of the Treasury Committee, I can say that we are trying to get a handle on the scrutiny that will be applied as regulators come to look at these things. One assumes that they will announce that they are reviewing a particular area, and they may come …..."
Angela Eagle - View Speech

View all Angela Eagle (Lab - Wallasey) contributions to the debate on: Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 25 Oct 2022
Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

"Clearly, Pepper v. Hart applies when a reassurance is given by a Minister. That is partly why we ask questions in these proceedings. We wish to have on record reassurances about the meaning of the statute in front of us, how the Government interpret it, and what the Government’s intent …..."
Angela Eagle - View Speech

View all Angela Eagle (Lab - Wallasey) contributions to the debate on: Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 25 Oct 2022
Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

"I want to register some concern and get the Minister’s reassurances on the record about what are very broad-ranging powers for the Treasury, which are then subject to constraints. Was it necessary to have such broad-ranging powers? It is not a good way of approaching things unless there are no …..."
Angela Eagle - View Speech

View all Angela Eagle (Lab - Wallasey) contributions to the debate on: Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Tue 25 Oct 2022
Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)

"I wonder whether the Minister could be a bit more forthcoming about when the amendment will be available, because that will give us a fuller picture of the Government’s decisions on the delicate balance that must be struck. Bearing in mind that the Committee sits for two weeks and at …..."
Angela Eagle - View Speech

View all Angela Eagle (Lab - Wallasey) contributions to the debate on: Financial Services and Markets Bill (Third sitting)