Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Anna Dixon Excerpts
Friday 16th May 2025

(1 day, 18 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rebecca Paul Portrait Rebecca Paul
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The key point is that we need to improve palliative care. We are spending so much time and effort focusing on this Bill rather than doing the thing that would actually help more people. My amendment 80, in combination with amendments 30 and 31 tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Dr Spencer), would drive significant improvements to palliative and end-of-life care, getting us closer to consistent and universally available care for all.

Anna Dixon Portrait Anna Dixon (Shipley) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I support the hon. Lady’s amendment. As the Royal College of Psychiatrists pointed out, pain from unresolved physical symptoms and the fear of physical pain or death can make a person want to die, and depression, which is also associated with a wish to die, is often missed. Does she agree that it is vital that people are supported to be free from pain by having access to good palliative and end-of-life care, and that the Bill’s provisions should be available only to those whom that cannot help?

Rebecca Paul Portrait Rebecca Paul
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely concur.

--- Later in debate ---
Anna Dixon Portrait Anna Dixon
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. I appreciate that you and the team have had a very difficult day, but as someone who tabled an amendment but has not had the opportunity to speak to it, I would like clarification that if a closure motion is moved, my amendment, as well as those tabled by other Members who have been unable to speak to them, will not receive further debate.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To be quite honest with you, the amendments that we have discussed are the ones that we have got through. On the amount of time allocated, in fairness, we are presuming what will come next. I am going to call the Minister; if a closure motion is moved, I will decide at that moment whether to accept it. The fact that many amendments may not have been spoken to is not unusual, which is why consideration will not last for one day, as per the normal procedure; it will continue over further days, on which further amendments will be discussed, and of course there will be Third Reading at a later date. I call the Minister.