To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 06 Feb 2018
Women’s Suffrage Centenary

"This is an amazing day for all of us women who have been elected to Parliament. I am the 201st woman to be elected.

I think today reminds us that so often when we study history, women’s participation in it, and contribution to it, is not celebrated or talked about. …..."

Caroline Flint - View Speech

View all Caroline Flint (Lab - Don Valley) contributions to the debate on: Women’s Suffrage Centenary

Written Question
Breathalysers
Wednesday 26th April 2017

Asked by: Caroline Flint (Labour - Don Valley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the reasons are for the time taken for Home Office Type Approval for mobile evidential breath testing equipment.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

The Government recognises that drink driving is a serious threat to road safety and shares the police’s desire to have roadside evidential breath test instruments available for use as soon as practicably possible. That is why the Home Office, Department for Transport and the police have been working with manufacturers towards the Type Approval of a new generation of Mobile Evidential Breath Test Instruments (MEBTI).

The requirements of Home Office type approval is supported by a stringent and robust process to ensure that evidence from an approved instrument can be relied upon in Court. The ability to type approve also depends on the submission by manufacturers of instruments that meet the technical specification requirements and perform satisfactorily during testing. The Home Office has no control over the maturity of instruments submitted into the type approval process, nor of the performance during testing of any device submitted and therefore no control over the timeframes for type approval.


Written Question
Breathalysers
Monday 24th April 2017

Asked by: Caroline Flint (Labour - Don Valley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what her policy is on the use of mobile evidential breathtesting equipment.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

The Type Approval Guide for station-based devices was released in May 2012, and a device was approved for use seven months later in December 2012. The type approval Guide for mobile devices was released in August 2013, with devices approved for use 16 months later in December 2014 and 18 months later in February 2015.

The Government recognises that drink driving is a serious threat to road safety and shares the police’s desire to have roadside evidential breath test instruments available for use as soon as practicably possible. That is why the Home Office, Department for Transport and the police have been working with manufacturers towards the Type Approval of a new generation of Mobile Evidential Breath Test Instruments (MEBTI).

The requirements of Home Office type approval is supported by a stringent and robust process to ensure that evidence from an approved instrument can be relied upon in Court. The ability to type approve also depends on the submission by manufacturers of instruments that meet the technical specification requirements and perform satisfactorily during testing. The Home Office has no control over the maturity of instruments submitted into the type approval process, nor of the performance during testing of any device submitted and therefore no control over the timeframes for type approval.


Written Question
Breathalysers
Monday 24th April 2017

Asked by: Caroline Flint (Labour - Don Valley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what reasons type approval of mobile evidential breathtesting equipment has taken longer than that of drugalysers.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

The Type Approval Guide for station-based devices was released in May 2012, and a device was approved for use seven months later in December 2012. The type approval Guide for mobile devices was released in August 2013, with devices approved for use 16 months later in December 2014 and 18 months later in February 2015.

The Government recognises that drink driving is a serious threat to road safety and shares the police’s desire to have roadside evidential breath test instruments available for use as soon as practicably possible. That is why the Home Office, Department for Transport and the police have been working with manufacturers towards the Type Approval of a new generation of Mobile Evidential Breath Test Instruments (MEBTI).

The requirements of Home Office type approval is supported by a stringent and robust process to ensure that evidence from an approved instrument can be relied upon in Court. The ability to type approve also depends on the submission by manufacturers of instruments that meet the technical specification requirements and perform satisfactorily during testing. The Home Office has no control over the maturity of instruments submitted into the type approval process, nor of the performance during testing of any device submitted and therefore no control over the timeframes for type approval.


Written Question
Drugalysers
Monday 24th April 2017

Asked by: Caroline Flint (Labour - Don Valley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how long it took to award type approval to drugalysers.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

The Type Approval Guide for station-based devices was released in May 2012, and a device was approved for use seven months later in December 2012. The type approval Guide for mobile devices was released in August 2013, with devices approved for use 16 months later in December 2014 and 18 months later in February 2015.

The Government recognises that drink driving is a serious threat to road safety and shares the police’s desire to have roadside evidential breath test instruments available for use as soon as practicably possible. That is why the Home Office, Department for Transport and the police have been working with manufacturers towards the Type Approval of a new generation of Mobile Evidential Breath Test Instruments (MEBTI).

The requirements of Home Office type approval is supported by a stringent and robust process to ensure that evidence from an approved instrument can be relied upon in Court. The ability to type approve also depends on the submission by manufacturers of instruments that meet the technical specification requirements and perform satisfactorily during testing. The Home Office has no control over the maturity of instruments submitted into the type approval process, nor of the performance during testing of any device submitted and therefore no control over the timeframes for type approval.


Written Question
Breathalysers
Monday 24th April 2017

Asked by: Caroline Flint (Labour - Don Valley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress is being made by her Department on obtaining Home Office Type Approval for mobile evidential breath testing equipment.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

The Government recognises that drink driving is a serious threat to road safety and shares the police’s desire to have roadside evidential breath test instruments available for use.

That is why the Home Office, Department for Transport and the police have been working with manufacturers towards the Type Approval of a new generation of Mobile Evidential Breath Test Instruments (MEBTI) as soon as practicably possible. Type approval is a complex process and relies on the submission by manufacturers of instruments which then perform satisfactorily during testing. The Home Office has no control over these factors.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 21 Feb 2017
Criminal Finances Bill

"It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Amber Valley (Nigel Mills). I almost feel like not making a speech and sitting down now—but I will not—because he made such excellent points about why public registers of beneficial ownership in our overseas territories are so important. I look …..."
Caroline Flint - View Speech

View all Caroline Flint (Lab - Don Valley) contributions to the debate on: Criminal Finances Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 21 Feb 2017
Criminal Finances Bill

"I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend and I thank him for his support and for putting his name to new clause 6. Aid is important, but more important is the question of how to create self-sufficiency so that more countries that are recipients of aid can stand on their …..."
Caroline Flint - View Speech

View all Caroline Flint (Lab - Don Valley) contributions to the debate on: Criminal Finances Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 21 Feb 2017
Criminal Finances Bill

"If we do not have the tools to make the difference, we are not going to see the change that I think everyone across the House wants to see. Without full access to transparent information, investigators will not know what information to request through these agreements, and that is fundamental. …..."
Caroline Flint - View Speech

View all Caroline Flint (Lab - Don Valley) contributions to the debate on: Criminal Finances Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 21 Feb 2017
Criminal Finances Bill

"I thank the Minister for that information, because I did go and read the final communiqué from the meeting in 2016, and while there was some mention of beneficial ownership and private registers, nothing in the communiqué mentioned any journey from private to public registers—the point I made a little …..."
Caroline Flint - View Speech

View all Caroline Flint (Lab - Don Valley) contributions to the debate on: Criminal Finances Bill