Rail Investment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Rail Investment

Clive Efford Excerpts
Thursday 25th November 2010

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This is not about the commercial position of franchisees; it is about the economic benefits. We are not just looking at costs and revenue. If revenues were able to justify the costs, franchisees would be able to do the work on their own, without Government support. We are looking typically at situations where the revenue from fares does not cover the costs, but the wider economic benefits justify the investment of public money.

Clive Efford Portrait Clive Efford (Eltham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My constituents are served by Southeastern and face the highest fare increases in the south-east network. They also suffer from pixies on the line—or rather, PIXCs: passengers in excess of capacity—at peak times, and there is a plan to deliver 12-car trains at peak times on that section of the network. Do the Government still intend to deliver those 12-car trains and relieve the congestion on the line?

Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is part of the Thameslink project—12-car trains running with Southeastern—and it will go ahead.