Information between 12th May 2025 - 1st June 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 95 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404 |
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315 |
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 102 |
13 May 2025 - UK-EU Summit - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 402 |
21 May 2025 - Immigration - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 267 |
21 May 2025 - Business and the Economy - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 253 |
22 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Clive Efford voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 124 |
Speeches |
---|
Clive Efford speeches from: Independent Sentencing Review
Clive Efford contributed 1 speech (50 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Clive Efford speeches from: Business of the House
Clive Efford contributed 1 speech (81 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
Clive Efford speeches from: UK-EU Summit
Clive Efford contributed 1 speech (77 words) Tuesday 20th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Clive Efford speeches from: Victims and Courts Bill
Clive Efford contributed 1 speech (82 words) 2nd reading2nd Reading Tuesday 20th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Clive Efford speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Clive Efford contributed 1 speech (59 words) Tuesday 13th May 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Blood: Contamination
Asked by: Clive Efford (Labour - Eltham and Chislehurst) Monday 19th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the tariffs for people infected with Hepatitis C through contaminated blood products. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office The impact of a Hepatitis infection can range from very mild to very severe, including liver failure and death as a direct result of the infection. In its second interim report, the Infected Blood Inquiry recommended that the compensation scheme should reflect the different impacts of infection by developing severity bandings.
The Expert Group provided the Government with clinical advice on the distinctions between these impacts. This meant the Government could set severity bands for Hepatitis infections based on clear clinical markers.
As set out in the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme Regulations 2025, where someone’s experience of Hepatitis, whether it is historic or in the present day, has been more severe, they will receive more compensation.
|
Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Clive Efford (Labour - Eltham and Chislehurst) Monday 19th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the commitments he made when giving evidence to the Infected Blood Inquiry on 7 May 2025, when he plans to respond to the five areas of compensation regulations following his review. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office As I said in my oral evidence to the Inquiry, I am open to considering a number of areas of the Scheme where doing so does not cause undue delay to the delivery of compensation. The Inquiry will be producing a further report and the Government will respond to this report when it is published.
|
Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Clive Efford (Labour - Eltham and Chislehurst) Tuesday 20th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to his evidence to the Infected Blood Inquiry on 7 May 2025, whether he intends to review (a) the compensation regulations and (b) the tariffs. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office As I said in my oral evidence to the Inquiry, I am open to considering a number of areas of the Scheme where doing so does not cause undue delay to the delivery of compensation. The Inquiry will be producing a further report and the Government will respond to this report when it is published
|
Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Asked by: Clive Efford (Labour - Eltham and Chislehurst) Tuesday 20th May 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme, if he will review the supplementary route for people for whom the impact of their viruses and their treatments are not fully captured by the core route tariff. Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office The Infected Blood Inquiry Response Expert Group provided advice on the design of infection severity bands for the core route. They considered the health impacts and treatments that applicants are likely to have experienced. This includes many side effects of treatments, including interferon, and conditions such as chronic fatigue. The core route tariffs therefore already take into account conditions that infected people are likely to experience as a result of their infection or treatment.
The supplementary route, as set out in the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme Regulations 2025, provides additional awards for applicants whose circumstances necessitate a higher compensation payment. As a result, the eligibility criteria for the Severe Health Condition award reflects the conditions and impacts the Expert Group identified as not being addressed in other aspects of the scheme, including the core route or Exceptional Loss award.
|
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Draft Scotland Act 1998 (Increase of Borrowing Limits) Order 2025
11 speeches (2,042 words) Wednesday 21st May 2025 - General Committees |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jun. 02 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 2 June 2025 Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Jodie Gosling Kate Osamor Helen Maguire Layla Moran Rosie Duffield Lillian Jones Ian Byrne Clive Efford |
May. 30 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 30 May 2025 Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Jodie Gosling Kate Osamor Helen Maguire Layla Moran Rosie Duffield Lillian Jones Ian Byrne Clive Efford |
May. 23 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 23 May 2025 Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Al-Hassan Alison Hume Andrew Cooper Zarah Sultana Wera Hobhouse Natasha Irons Naushabah Khan Clive Efford |
May. 22 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 22 May 2025 Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Al-Hassan Alison Hume Andrew Cooper Zarah Sultana Wera Hobhouse Natasha Irons Naushabah Khan Clive Efford |