Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Daniel Francis Excerpts
Friday 20th June 2025

(1 day, 14 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Daniel Francis Portrait Daniel Francis (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I agree with the hon. Member that people in those circumstances should be able to seek an assisted death. However, the Bill allows someone to say to a doctor on a panel, “I want to go because I do not want to be a burden,” even if they are not suffering at that point in time. It also allows them to say, “I want to go now, so that my family have a larger inheritance.” Why should we support a Bill this afternoon that allows those things?

Josh Babarinde Portrait Josh Babarinde
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Member will be aware that the Bill creates a criminal offence that would punish those who would coerce a relative in such a way. [Hon. Members: “Self-coerce.”] There are folks who talk about the concept of self-coercion, but others would frame such a decision as a choice. Self-coercion is a choice.

My constituent said,

“This could have been avoided with an assisted dying law. My partner was from a jurisdiction where such a law exists. A relative used that law. They were able to gather their family, say a proper goodbye and die in peace and with dignity before losing all physical and mental capacity.”