Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Oral Answers to Questions

Daniel Francis Excerpts
Thursday 11th September 2025

(1 day, 11 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Daniel Francis Portrait Daniel Francis (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

16. What steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues to update regulations on the use of micromobility vehicles.

Simon Lightwood Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Simon Lightwood)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Shared e-scooter schemes can provide a great way to get around, but the scooters can pose a nuisance for other people, so we need to ensure that their roll-out is both safe and properly regulated. We have extended e-scooter trials until May 2028 to allow local authorities to test how the technology works. We have also committed to pursuing legislation, when parliamentary time allows, for the full regulation of micromobility in order to create a safe shared-use network where they work for all people.

Daniel Francis Portrait Daniel Francis
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I declare an interest as chair of the all-party parliamentary group for wheelchair users. Does the Minister accept that a wheelchair, whether manual or with power, is a medical device that enables disabled people to maximise their independence and live the life they choose? Does he therefore agree that the terminology of “invalid carriages” in the legislation is discriminatory and outdated and that the regulations on the use of micromobility vehicles require updating urgently?

Simon Lightwood Portrait Simon Lightwood
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I share my hon. Friend’s view that the term “invalid carriages” in the existing legislation is outdated and no longer reflects modern attitudes or needs. This Government are committed to ensuring that disabled people have the same freedom to travel as everyone else and we recognise that mobility devices are vital for many. That is why we are reviewing the legal frameworks surrounding mobility devices, including the outdated terminology, and we will consult on that in due course.