Information between 29th November 2025 - 9th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 350 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Daniel Zeichner voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Daniel Zeichner speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Daniel Zeichner contributed 2 speeches (85 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Daniel Zeichner speeches from: Ely: Railway Upgrade
Daniel Zeichner contributed 1 speech (41 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Daniel Zeichner speeches from: Oxford to Cambridge Growth Corridor
Daniel Zeichner contributed 6 speeches (2,709 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Marine Protected Areas: Seabed
Asked by: Daniel Zeichner (Labour - Cambridge) Thursday 4th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether she has made and assessment of the potential merits of re-auditing seabed habitats in Marine Protected Areas. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra is undertaking a review of the English Marine Protected Area network to look at whether sites are in the right places with the right protection. The review will explore ways to update protection and management approaches to better address the nature crisis and improve climate change resilience, while supporting wider Government priorities including food security and net zero. The review includes assessing sites that have been designated for seabed habitats. |
|
Marine Protected Areas: Seabed
Asked by: Daniel Zeichner (Labour - Cambridge) Thursday 4th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether her department (a) conducted a review of the reliability of its data on seabed habitats in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) before announcing proposed fisheries management measures in Stage 3 MPAs, and (b) will publish the review’s conclusions. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Drawing on the best scientific advice available, the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) has determined that management of fishing activities is required to protect our Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and to ensure compliance with our domestic and international legal obligations.
As part of the consultation on proposed byelaws for stage 3 MPAs, fisheries assessments were published for each site based on scientific advice from Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and using evidence on the impacts of fishing gears on protected seabed habitats. This was supplemented by a call for evidence earlier in the process.
The consultation closed on 29 September and the MMO is now analysing the very large number of responses received, including any additional evidence on benthic habitats. |
|
Marine Protected Areas: Seabed
Asked by: Daniel Zeichner (Labour - Cambridge) Thursday 4th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if her department will conduct a full benthic audit of seabed habitats in the 41 Stage 3 Marine Protected Areas before designating new fisheries management measures. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Drawing on the best scientific advice available, the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) has determined that management of fishing activities is required to protect our Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and to ensure compliance with our domestic and international legal obligations.
As part of the consultation on proposed byelaws for stage 3 MPAs, fisheries assessments were published for each site based on scientific advice from Natural England and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and using evidence on the impacts of fishing gears on protected seabed habitats. This was supplemented by a call for evidence earlier in the process.
The consultation closed on 29 September and the MMO is now analysing the very large number of responses received, including any additional evidence on benthic habitats. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Oral Answers to Questions
139 speeches (8,707 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Jim Shannon (DUP - Strangford) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner), most food insecurity in Northern Ireland comes from a lack of - Link to Speech |
|
Oxford to Cambridge Growth Corridor
67 speeches (15,149 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Charlotte Cane (LD - Ely and East Cambridgeshire) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this important debate. - Link to Speech 2: Blake Stephenson (Con - Mid Bedfordshire) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this important debate. - Link to Speech 3: Rachel Hopkins (Lab - Luton South and South Bedfordshire) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this important debate. - Link to Speech 4: Alex Mayer (Lab - Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this important debate. - Link to Speech 5: Paul Holmes (Con - Hamble Valley) Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this important debate. - Link to Speech 6: Callum Anderson (Lab - Buckingham and Bletchley) Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this debate. - Link to Speech 7: Chris Curtis (Lab - Milton Keynes North) Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this debate. - Link to Speech 8: Matthew Pennycook (Lab - Greenwich and Woolwich) Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) on securing this debate. - Link to Speech |
|
Ely: Railway Upgrade
19 speeches (3,922 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Friend the Member for Cambridge (Daniel Zeichner) brings great knowledge and experience to this debate - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Q65 Daniel Zeichner: Thank you, Chair. Good morning to you both. |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - UKQuantum, and Quantinuum Science diplomacy - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Darlington; George Freeman; Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Samantha Niblett; Martin Wrigley; Daniel Zeichner |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Imperial College London, and Amadeus Capital Partners Science diplomacy - Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Found: Darlington; George Freeman; Dr Allison Gardner; Kit Malthouse; Samantha Niblett; Martin Wrigley; Daniel Zeichner |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Digital inclusion and telecoms At 9:30am: Oral evidence Paul Hollingshead - Lead, UK & Europe at Saronic At 9:45am: Oral evidence The Baroness Lloyd of Effra CBE - Minister for Digital Economy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Kevin Adams - Interim Director Digital Infrastructure at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Jenny Hall - Director Digital and Data Policy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 6th January 2026 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
6 Nov 2025
The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Hair and beauty products (chemicals applied to the hair or body for cosmetic purposes) and treatments (cosmetic procedures typically performed by specialists) can cause harm to consumers if they contain unregulated ingredients or if they are improperly administered. The inquiry will respond to recent research which has led to concerns about the current scientific evidence base and regulation for these products, as well as the required training and qualifications of specialists performing treatments. The inquiry will also investigate the growing concern that certain products that are commonly used by marginalised groups, such as creams to ‘relax’ afro-type hair and synthetic hair, can contain harmful chemicals.
|
|
24 Nov 2025
Data security across government Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions On 15 July 2025 the Defence Secretary told the House of Commons about a large-scale data breach that had taken place in 2022, when a Ministry of Defence official emailed a spreadsheet to an external contact, unaware that it contained details relating to 18,700 Afghan nationals applying for relocation. In the wake of this, and other serious public sector data breaches, the committee chair wrote to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, and the Information Commissioner, to find out more about data hygiene and data management practices across government. This led to the publication in August 2025 of an Information Security Review which had been undertaken by the Cabinet Office in 2023 but not published. In August and then October 2025 the government announced further details of their intended response to the Afghan data breach - and others like it – and the subsequent review. On 21 October 2025 the committee questioned the Information Commissioner about his office's response to the February 2022 breach and wider learnings for government information and data security. In February 2026, the committee will question the Security Minister and Minister for Digital Government and Data on how the government has responded to the breach, and implemented the recommendations made in the Information Security Review. |