Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office

Debate between David Lammy and Scott Arthur
Thursday 19th June 2025

(3 days, 16 hours ago)

Written Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- Hansard - -

We have the most robust export licensing regime in the world, and I am proud of that. That was a matter that this House voted on just a few years ago under the last Government, and the right hon. Gentleman will know that we made a decision to restrict arms sales to Israel that could be used in Gaza. I also refer him to the statements that I have made about Iran’s nuclear intent, the work of the IAEA, the huge global concern and the UN resolution that the UK did so much to secure last Thursday.

[Official Report, 16 June 2025; Vol. 769, c. 72.]

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Scott Arthur (Edinburgh South West) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Foreign Secretary for his statement, his reassurance that Gaza will not be forgotten, and for having been really quick to come out and ask for de-escalation and a negotiated settlement. Nobody wants to see a nuclear Iran, not least the people of Iran, who are paying for this investment by the Iranian regime, but Netanyahu justified the bombing raids by saying that Iran was close to having a bomb and that it could be years or just months away. Was Netanyahu correct?

Iran-Israel Conflict

Debate between David Lammy and Scott Arthur
Monday 16th June 2025

(6 days, 16 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - -

It is hugely important that we do all we can. I believe the best way forward is diplomatic, because attempting to do this militarily, I am afraid, cannot be achieved, and I think that is widely understood.

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Scott Arthur (Edinburgh South West) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Foreign Secretary for his statement, his reassurance that Gaza will not be forgotten, and for having been really quick to come out and ask for de-escalation and a negotiated settlement. Nobody wants to see a nuclear Iran, not least the people of Iran, who are paying for this investment by the Iranian regime, but Netanyahu justified the bombing raids by saying that Iran was close to having a bomb and that it could be years or just months away. Was Netanyahu correct?

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I call to mind the work of the IAEA, and refer my hon. Friend to the resolution of the UN Security Council just last week, all of which confirmed Iran’s intent and its deception.

China: Human Rights and Sanctions

Debate between David Lammy and Scott Arthur
Monday 28th October 2024

(7 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman is right: we must have a consistent, sustained position on China. That is why we are undertaking a China audit, and I will of course update the House when it is complete.

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Scott Arthur (Edinburgh South West) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Foreign Secretary for his update, his constructive tone and his defence of human rights in the region. Is the audit Government-wide, and will it only consider the situation now or look into future scenarios as well?

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - -

It was important, when we came into government, given the bouncing around that we saw in the last Government’s policy towards China, that we did a complete audit, right across Whitehall, of our interests and the opportunities, as well as of the challenges and security concerns, so that we could maintain a consistent position. Before that audit is complete, we are being guided, as I have said, by the three Cs: there are areas in which we co-operate, areas in which we compete, and there must be areas, as has come up this afternoon, in which we challenge.

British Indian Ocean Territory: Negotiations

Debate between David Lammy and Scott Arthur
Monday 7th October 2024

(8 months, 2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I urge the right hon. Gentleman to read the remarks of the Chief Minister of the Falkland Islands, and I urge him to consult more widely the defence establishment in this country, which is pleased that an issue that was looking as though it might become very contentious between us and the United States in terms of global national security has now been settled.

Scott Arthur Portrait Dr Scott Arthur (Edinburgh South West) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Secretary of State for his statement, and particularly for the reassurances given to our brothers and sisters in Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands. The scaremongering in respect of those two areas has been absolutely shameful. However, in the spirit of trying to achieve cross-party consensus, it is really important to acknowledge the work of the previous Government on this subject and how that has provided the foundation for what we have today. Before then, progress was all too slow, and it shamed our country. None the less, I want to give the Secretary the opportunity again to reassure us that this deal is in our strategic interest and also the interest of our partners.