Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Edward Morello Excerpts
2nd reading
Monday 24th March 2025

(7 months, 3 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Alex Brewer Portrait Alex Brewer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The right hon. Member has anticipated my next point. To ensure that development is approached effectively and sustainably, there must be legislation to protect chalk streams. The Government should use the Bill to expand the list of irreplaceable habitats that are severely threatened and include chalk streams in it. Mitigation schemes will not help these unique habitats. They need protection. Unbelievably, this is the second Bill in six months that the Government could have used to protect our precious chalk streams, as the Water (Special Measures) Bill also failed to mention them specifically.

Edward Morello Portrait Edward Morello (West Dorset) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Like my hon. Friend, I have two chalk streams in my constituency. Does she agree that making water companies statutory consultees in any future developments will ensure provision of the infrastructure that is required, so that no more pollution goes into our chalk streams?

Alex Brewer Portrait Alex Brewer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I completely agree. The Government should be more ambitious in the Bill to ensure that building regulations mandate nature-friendly developments to provide sustainable and healthy housing.

Planning and Infrastructure Bill

Edward Morello Excerpts
Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I accept what the Minister is saying and that elements of species protection may require strategic approaches. However, the fundamental point for the Liberal Democrats is that if the Government made a commitment to stronger protections within EDPs from the outset, in terms of the mitigation hierarchy and the protection of species on site, then we would be more open to supporting their position, but they have not made that commitment, so we cannot give our support and Lords amendment 40 needs to remain.

Lords amendment 38, proposed by the Bishop of Norwich and supported by Liberal Democrat peers, is equally important. It would ensure that the new spatial development strategies include protections for our incredibly rare and valuable chalk streams. Shockingly, there is currently a lack of protection for these rare and incredible habitats. Around 85% of the world’s chalk streams are in England. They are as rare globally as rainforests, and yet they do not have the required designation as irreplaceable habitats. [Interruption.] I do not know where that voice came from, but I am happy to give way.

Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Ah, over there.

Edward Morello Portrait Edward Morello
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way. He will know that West Dorset is home to a number of our rare and precious chalk streams, including the Frome and the Wraxall brook. Does he agree with me that a system similar to the Blue Flag status that we have for beaches would be a relatively cheap and easy way for the Government to provide environmental protections for our chalk streams?

Gideon Amos Portrait Gideon Amos
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my hon. Friend, who does an excellent job championing the chalk streams in his constituency. A public-facing, recognised standard for chalk streams, similar to those that we have for other environmental designations, would be incredibly welcome.