Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Grahame Morris

Main Page: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington)

Firefighters’ Pension Scheme (England)

Grahame Morris Excerpts
Monday 15th December 2014

(9 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Beith Portrait Sir Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The time available does not allow me to spend time discussing the value we attach to the fire service or the issues that arise because the previous Government introduced the age limit of 60, but there is a central issue—

Grahame Morris Portrait Grahame M. Morris (Easington) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way on that point?

Lord Beith Portrait Sir Alan Beith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, in my three minutes I am going to make an important point—there is a central point to make. The Minister’s written statement today states:

“These principles…will ensure that no firefighter faces a situation where they are forced to retire without access to a fair pension where they lose fitness through no fault of their own.

I do not doubt her sincerity in asserting that that is what she believes should happen, but what I am still doubtful about, and what I still want to hear more about, is how we ensure that it does happen and that if a particular fire authority does not apply those principles, some action is taken to protect the individual affected. I envisage a situation in which one or two fire authorities do not carry out the letter or the spirit of this framework and I want to know what happens to the individuals in those cases. When people are as close as I am to Scotland—at the border—they look over that border, and firefighters see clearer, firmer protection on the other side. So I would like the Minister to give me clearer assurance as to how she ensures this happens. Merely stating that the framework is part of a statutory framework does not tell me how I can be sure that that firefighter can be protected.

Other firefighters are also affected adversely even if we sort that issue out. For example, a man who has served for 32 years and who had hoped to retire at 50 —he is under the previous scheme—will not now be able to do so. There are also people who will be worse off if the kind of changes that have been proposed are made, for example to assist those retiring at 55, 56 or 57 with a 12% rather than a 22% reduction. But members of the FBU have accepted that it might be reasonable to help that particular group. My primary concern is for the firefighters who, given a lack of non-operational jobs, find they are losing their job and do not know how to enforce what the Minister has said tonight.