Debates between Huw Merriman and Graham Stringer during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Mon 27th Mar 2017
Bus Services Bill [Lords]
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

Bus Services Bill [Lords]

Debate between Huw Merriman and Graham Stringer
3rd reading: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons
Monday 27th March 2017

(7 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Bus Services Act 2017 View all Bus Services Act 2017 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 27 March 2017 - (27 Mar 2017)
Graham Stringer Portrait Graham Stringer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do indeed recall the time and effort spent on the Committee’s reports with my hon. Friend. They show that competition does not take place on the road—that is a myth—and that we have left the public purse vulnerable to parasites like Brian Souter who have taken money out of it while putting up prices and reducing the service.

There will be a rearguard resistance from people who have benefited from the system, but we, as parliamentarians who have a duty to look after raised taxes, should support the consensus in favour of a bus strategy that I believe exists in the House. After all, there are strategies throughout the rest of our transport system.

Huw Merriman Portrait Huw Merriman (Bexhill and Battle) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Like the hon. Member for Blackley and Broughton (Graham Stringer), I was a member of the Bill Committee, and was pleased to contribute to what was, as the hon. Gentleman said, a consensual discussion. It was very well piloted by the Minister, to whom I was grateful for sending a Double Decker chocolate bar through the internal mail. Sadly, owing to the internal mail system, it looked more like a bendy bus by the time it was opened, but I was grateful none the less.

There is much in new clause 1 that is attractive, but I think that, given the improved local data requirements in the Bill, it should be perfectly possible to fix the strategy on a local basis rather than needing some form of Government top-down approach. The essential aim of the Bill is surely to bring about more localism.