To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Ministry of Justice: Re-employment
Monday 19th July 2021

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to the oral contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy of 27 April 2021, Official Report, column 86WH, on the Government's policy on the inappropriate use by some employers of fire and rehire as a negotiation tactic, what steps their Department has taken to (a) investigate and (b) discourage the use of fire and rehire negotiation tactics by their Department's executive non-departmental public bodies; and what steps they have taken to communicate the Government's policy on those practices to those bodies.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

The use of ‘fire and rehire negotiation tactics’ is not an approach that my Department deploys.

The Government has been very clear that threatening fire and rehire as a negotiating tactic is completely unacceptable. We always expect employers to treat employees fairly and in the spirit of partnership working with trade unions, where relevant, constructively. We are confident that all non-departmental public bodies are aware of the Government’s position on this matter.

We work constructively with each non-departmental public body we have responsibility for and this includes when it comes to workforce management matters, however each is ultimately responsible for the management of their staff.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 16 Mar 2021
Oral Answers to Questions

" What steps he is taking to tackle legal aid advice deserts. ..."
Imran Hussain - View Speech

View all Imran Hussain (Lab - Bradford East) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 16 Mar 2021
Oral Answers to Questions

"Bradford’s community advice centres that provide legal support have been devastated by the Government’s funding cuts and preference for bigger providers. As a result, some of our excellent, hard-working, local grassroot community advice centres have been run into the ground, creating legal aid and advice deserts in some of our …..."
Imran Hussain - View Speech

View all Imran Hussain (Lab - Bradford East) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Equality
Wednesday 15th July 2020

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to his Answer of 6 July 2020 to Question 66877, what the completion rate was of diversity monitoring forms attached to employment tribunal claims forms in each year from 2010.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

The information requested was not collated centrally prior to September 2018. The table below displays the information relating to the volume of online claims submitted from September 2018 to March 2020.

Date Range

Number of online Employment Tribunal claims submitted

Number of ethnic monitoring questionnaires completed

% of ethnic monitoring questionnaires per claim submitted

05/09/2018 31/03/2019

26066

821

3

01/04/2019 31/03/2020

52096

1574

3

Total

78162

2395

3

  • The above data was generated from information stored on the online application system.
  • It is not used for internal or external purposes; therefore, the details are subject to inaccuracies, it is however the only/best data available
  • Completion of the diversity questionnaire is not mandatory.
  • We cannot provide information from 1 April 2020, as that information forms a subset of Employment Tribunal data that is part of Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) Official Statistics output, which will be published later in 2020 (statistics relating to April to June 2020 is due for publication in September 2020).

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 14 Jul 2020
Oral Answers to Questions

" What progress he has made on implementing the recommendations of the Lammy Review, “An independent review into the treatment of, and outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic individuals in the Criminal Justice System”, published in September 2017. ..."
Imran Hussain - View Speech

View all Imran Hussain (Lab - Bradford East) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 14 Jul 2020
Oral Answers to Questions

"Stop-and-search is a misused, overused and discriminatory police tactic disproportionately applied to black, Asian and other minority communities, which results in deep resentment and distrust towards the police and the Government. Will the Government, at the very least, hold their hands up and accept that many black, Asian and other …..."
Imran Hussain - View Speech

View all Imran Hussain (Lab - Bradford East) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Fees and Charges
Thursday 9th July 2020

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 6 July 2020 to Question 66875, if his Department will publish all correspondence between his Department and the Law Commission relating to tribunal fees from 26 July 2017.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

The Ministry of Justice holds regular discussions with many organisations, including the Law Commission, about various policy areas. We do not routinely publish internal discussions between Government and other organisations, such as the Law Commission.


Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Ethnic Groups
Tuesday 7th July 2020

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of employment tribunal claims were successful in each of the last five years; and what proportion of those claimants came from each ethnic group.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

HM Courts & Tribunals Service does not hold the data being requested.

The official statistics can provide information on the percentage of cases successful at hearing but they are not separated by ethnic group.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/tribunals-statistics


Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Fees and Charges
Monday 6th July 2020

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions his Department has had with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy on the reintroduction of employment tribunal fees.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

The Ministry of Justice has frequent discussions with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy on many aspects of Employment Tribunals. There have been no decisions regarding the re-introduction of fees in the Employment Tribunal. The Government is committed to the effective enforcement of employment rights. Should we bring forward any formal proposals relating to the re-introduction of fees in the Employment Tribunal, they would be subject to a full public consultation.


Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Ethnic Groups
Monday 6th July 2020

Asked by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people in each category of ethnicity have brought employment tribunal claims in each year since 2010.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

A diversity monitoring form is attached to the employment tribunal claim form ET1 but the completion of this form is optional. The completion rate is far below the usual 60% threshold used for diversity reporting. Representation rates based on return rates below 60% are not considered statistically valid because they are unlikely to provide a representative picture of all claimants.