Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Attorney General

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Jacob Rees-Mogg Excerpts
Wednesday 24th May 2023

(12 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Robert Buckland Portrait Sir Robert Buckland
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend says he is a protectionist, and I think that might need a bit of amplification. I do not think he means it in the traditional sense of the word, but I am genuinely intrigued.

Jacob Rees-Mogg Portrait Mr Rees-Mogg
- Hansard - -

Yes, he does!

Danny Kruger Portrait Danny Kruger
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think my right hon. and learned Friend is trying to rescue me from some sort of political blunder, which I am perfectly capable of making. I am grateful to him for that. This is not the moment for that great debate, although I mentioned the tension in our philosophy between the free trading and protectionist impulses. I want to look after our Wiltshire farmers and I want to see the industry of this country rise again and Britain become a great exporting nation.

Jacob Rees-Mogg Portrait Mr Rees-Mogg
- Hansard - -

I wonder if it is fair to say that my hon. Friend is the Lord George Bentinck of the modern era?

Danny Kruger Portrait Danny Kruger
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very grateful to my right hon. Friend, the Peel of our era.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I will not try the patience of the House any longer. My point is that, whether people are free traders or protectionists, surely they want to see VAT reformed. That was the great Brexit freedom opportunity, and we should be using our new freedoms to do it.

We need more ambition. I recognise that the Government intend to report every six months. I am pleased with amendment (b) to Lords amendment 16, tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Watford (Dean Russell) with the support of the Government, and I particularly support amendment (a) to Lords amendment 16 in the name of the Secretary of State and my hon. Friend the Member for Stone, which will require the Government to specify at every reporting stage the laws that are going to be reformed or revoked. I support the case my hon. Friend made for having some kind of tsar or commander-in-chief to oversee the process of identifying the laws for reform or revocation. We need a good process here, but we have the right Bill with the right principles in it, and we can now fight out the proper vision for the future of our country.