Information between 9th July 2025 - 19th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 54 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Jake Richards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 54 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Jake Richards speeches from: Welfare Spending
Jake Richards contributed 1 speech (67 words) Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Jake Richards speeches from: Business of the House
Jake Richards contributed 1 speech (95 words) Thursday 10th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Home Office: Armed Forces Covenant
Asked by: Jake Richards (Labour - Rother Valley) Monday 14th July 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of extending the Armed Forces Covenant Duty across her Departmental responsibilities. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office greatly values the contribution of all service personnel and remains committed to upholding its moral obligations under the Armed Forces Covenant. The Department already embeds the principles of the Covenant, specifically within the provisions of the Appendix HM Armed Forces route which ensures that service personnel and their families are not disadvantaged in immigration matters due to their service. |
|
Department of Health and Social Care: Armed Forces Covenant
Asked by: Jake Richards (Labour - Rother Valley) Thursday 10th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of extending the Armed Forces Covenant Duty across his Departmental responsibilities. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department is supportive of the extension of the Armed Forces Covenant. A key benefit of the Department having a legal duty to have due regard to the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant is greater awareness and consistency of the unique impacts of military service on health and care needs from the early stages of policy development through to operational delivery from the National Health Service and local authorities. NHS England and other specified NHS bodies have a statutory obligation to have due regard to the principles of the Armed Forces Covenant. Extending this duty to include the Department will build on the good work of the NHS to date and will play an important role within the new NHS model for the benefit of the Armed Forces Community. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 11th July 2025
Report - 3rd Report - Tackling violence against women and girls: funding Home Affairs Committee Found: Reid (Labour; East Kilbride and Strathaven) Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour; Clapham and Brixton Hill) Jake Richards |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 15th July 2025 1:45 p.m. Home Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Combatting New Forms of Extremism At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Dr Joe Whittaker - Senior Lecturer in Criminology, Sociology, and Social Policy at Swansea University, and Director at Vox Pol Institute Dr Daniel Allington - Reader in Social Analytics at King's College London, Senior Associate Fellow, Counter Extremism Group Fellow at London Centre for the Study of Contemporary Antisemitism, and Deputy Editor at Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism Professor Laura G. E. Smith - Professor of Psychology at Department of Psychology, University of Bath, and Director at Bath Institute for Digital Security and Behaviour At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Robin Simcox - Commissioner at Commission for Countering Extremism Lord Anderson KC, Interim Independent Prevent Commissioner View calendar - Add to calendar |