Glasgow Safer Drug Consumption Facility Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

John Grady

Main Page: John Grady (Labour - Glasgow East)

Glasgow Safer Drug Consumption Facility

John Grady Excerpts
Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 19 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Patricia Ferguson Portrait Patricia Ferguson
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

To be perfectly frank, I cannot answer the hon. Member’s question because we did not take evidence on the situation elsewhere in the UK and were particularly focused on Scotland, as one would expect of the Scottish Affairs Committee. It may be that the prosecutorial discretion that the Lord Advocate has offered is something that others wish to look to, but whether or not the law in England and Wales would allow that is not for me to say because I genuinely do not know.

John Grady Portrait John Grady (Glasgow East) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The facility is located in my constituency. The report stresses the importance of engagement with the local community. Drug litter and public injecting very close to the facility are a cause of real concern for my constituents, whose worries are not being properly addressed. There are now suggestions that the facility could open for 24 hours a day—a cause of real worry for my constituents. The community must be properly consulted about material changes to the facility. Does my hon. Friend agree that a robust strategy is essential not only for communicating with but for listening to and addressing the concerns of my constituents?

Patricia Ferguson Portrait Patricia Ferguson
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to say that public confidence in the facility is paramount if it is to have a future—and even for the duration of the three-year pilot. Committee members who attended the forum were very struck by the fact that although forum members from the community and local businesses were raising questions with the operators of the Thistle and those involved most closely with it, there was no mechanism for a response to be given between meetings. We suggested that the communications strategy needed to be much more responsive so that if a problem is raised, or a good comment made, the Thistle can respond to it rather than wait until the next meeting. That would give the public a lot more confidence and reassurance that their concerns were being addressed.