All 2 John Redwood contributions to the Building Safety Act 2022

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Wed 19th Jan 2022
Building Safety Bill
Commons Chamber

Report stage & Report stage
Wed 20th Apr 2022
Building Safety Bill
Commons Chamber

Consideration of Lords amendments & Consideration of Lords amendments

Building Safety Bill

John Redwood Excerpts
Christopher Pincher Portrait Christopher Pincher
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Defective Premises Act has been in effect since 1972, so there is a significant body of case law that those wishing to bring an action, and indeed the courts, will be able to refer to, to determine whether a premises is defective and therefore whether an action should be successful. I am happy to write to the hon. Gentleman with further detail, but I can assure him that the Act is of long standing and has been well used, and there is a body of case law that can be applied.

John Redwood Portrait John Redwood (Wokingham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Is there any right of redress to the regulatory authorities in local government, such as building inspectors and others, who were responsible for signing off on these schemes?

Christopher Pincher Portrait Christopher Pincher
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We certainly want to ensure though the Bill, that the building control mechanism and the industry are improved. I think that a suite of measures, including the introduction of better building control measures, the retrospection of the Defective Premises Act and further work that we may choose to do, working across parties, will help ensure that a very complicated and detailed set of challenges, which have emerged recently but have been developing over many years, are properly addressed.

Building Safety Bill

John Redwood Excerpts
Consideration of Lords amendments
Wednesday 20th April 2022

(2 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Building Safety Act 2022 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Commons Consideration of Lords Amendments as at 20 April 2022 - (20 Apr 2022)
Stuart Andrew Portrait Stuart Andrew
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not know the specifics, to be really honest with the hon. Gentleman. He will know that I have picked this issue up lately, and if he does not mind, I will come back to him with a definitive answer.

The leaseholder protections that were introduced in the other place put our commitments into law. Qualifying leaseholders—defined as those living in their own homes or with up to three UK properties in total in buildings that are above 11 metres or five storeys—will be legally protected from all costs associated with the remediation of unsafe cladding, as will all leaseholders in buildings owned by or associated with the developer. Leaseholders in buildings above 18 metres are already protected by the Government’s £5.1 billion building safety fund for the removal of unsafe cladding. It is the Government’s expectation that developers will pay to fix buildings that they had a role in developing or refurbishing.

John Redwood Portrait John Redwood (Wokingham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Has it been possible to trace any foreign companies or foreign interests that are involved in these matters? Will they be making their contribution?

Stuart Andrew Portrait Stuart Andrew
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend raises an important point. I shall address that specific point later in my speech.