Information between 9th June 2026 - 19th June 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 86 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 287 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 290 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 279 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 149 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 266 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 271 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 244 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 258 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 249 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 317 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill (Allocation of Time) - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 231 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 94 |
|
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 145 Noes - 251 |
|
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 247 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 266 |
|
8 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 257 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Jon Pearce voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 86 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Holocaust: Restitution
Asked by: Baroness Deech (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress has been made in securing for British claimants restitution, compensation for, or commemoration of property seized from Polish victims of the Nazis since the appointment of the first Special Envoy for Post Holocaust Issues in 2010. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The UK believes strongly in the principle of property restitution for Holocaust survivors, who have waited over 80 years for justice and recognition of their loss of property. We are committed to upholding the Terezin Declaration on Holocaust-Era Assets, which sets out measures to right the economic wrongs that accompanied the Holocaust against the Jews and other victims of Nazi persecution across Europe. The UK Special Envoy for Post-Holocaust Issues, Jon Pearce MP, most recently met with the president of the World Jewish Restitution Organisation (WJRO) on May 6 where the issue of restitution, including in Poland, was discussed as a priority. We continue to work closely with the WJRO to progress restitution efforts. |
|
Holocaust: Restitution
Asked by: Baroness Deech (Crossbench - Life peer) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with the most recent incumbent Special Envoy for Post Holocaust Issues regarding that post's role in international progress on Holocaust-era property and art restitution issues. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The UK believes strongly in the principle of property restitution for Holocaust survivors, who have waited over 80 years for justice and recognition of their loss of property. We are committed to upholding the Terezin Declaration on Holocaust-Era Assets, which sets out measures to right the economic wrongs that accompanied the Holocaust against the Jews and other victims of Nazi persecution across Europe. The UK Special Envoy for Post-Holocaust Issues, Jon Pearce MP, most recently met with the president of the World Jewish Restitution Organisation (WJRO) on May 6 where the issue of restitution, including in Poland, was discussed as a priority. We continue to work closely with the WJRO to progress restitution efforts. |