To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Nov 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

"There are various different aspects to what right we will have to pursue court cases and judicial review once this law comes into effect. We discussed some of those when we talked about the role of the European Court of Justice, the governance gap and the fact that if breaches …..."
Kerry McCarthy - View Speech

View all Kerry McCarthy (Lab - Bristol East) contributions to the debate on: European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Nov 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

"My hon. Friend is quite right. It is about the removal of the cap on costs as well, and the fact that local people bringing these cases might find themselves liable to a huge financial burden if they are not successful.

Amendment 93 removes clause 4(1)(b), which restricts rights in …..."

Kerry McCarthy - View Speech

View all Kerry McCarthy (Lab - Bristol East) contributions to the debate on: European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Nov 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

"I can only invite the Minister to intervene on me at some point before I finish this speech and give a bit more clarity. I am glad that another superior intellect is as baffled as I was by that provision.

Amendment 95 adds wording that attempts to deal with the …..."

Kerry McCarthy - View Speech

View all Kerry McCarthy (Lab - Bristol East) contributions to the debate on: European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Nov 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

"I am about to finish my speech.

Guidance is much easier to change at the whim of the Government or, indeed, the Secretary of State. The courts are much less likely to uphold guidance. There is much more deference from the courts to the authority or organisation whose decision is …..."

Kerry McCarthy - View Speech

View all Kerry McCarthy (Lab - Bristol East) contributions to the debate on: European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Written Question
Hunting Act 2004
Thursday 13th October 2016

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, how many people were (a) prosecuted for and (b) convicted of offences under the Hunting Act 2004 in 2015; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by Robert Buckland

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of people who have been charged with, and prosecuted for, offences brought by way of the Hunting Act 2004. This information could only be obtained by examining CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.

Although it is not possible to identify the number of people charged with particular offences, records are held showing the overall number of offences in which a prosecution commenced in the magistrates’ courts. The table below shows the number of offences, rather than defendants, charged by way of the Hunting Act 2004 during 2015. A single defendant may be charged with more than one offence.

2015

Hunting Act 2004

88

Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System


Written Question
Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996
Thursday 13th October 2016

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, how many people were (a) prosecuted for and (b) convicted of offences under the Wild Animals (Protection) Act 1996 in 2015; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by Robert Buckland

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of people who have been charged with, and prosecuted for, offences brought by way of the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996. This information could only be obtained by examining CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.

Although it is not possible to identify the number of people charged with particular offences, records are held showing the overall number of offences in which a prosecution commenced in the magistrates’ courts. The table below shows the number of offences, rather than defendants, charged by way of the Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996 during 2015. A single defendant may be charged with more than one offence.

2015

Wild Mammals (Protection) Act 1996

1

Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System


Written Question
Badgers Act 1991
Thursday 13th October 2016

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, how many people were (a) prosecuted for and (b) convicted of offences under the Badgers Act 1991 in 2015; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by Robert Buckland

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of people who have been charged with, and prosecuted for, offences brought by way of the Protection of Badgers Act 1991. This information could only be obtained by examining CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.

Although it is not possible to identify the number of people charged with particular offences, records are held showing the overall number of offences in which a prosecution commenced in the magistrates’ courts. The table below shows the number of offences, rather than defendants, charged by way of the Protection of Badgers Act 1991 during 2015. A single defendant may be charged with more than one offence.

2015

Protection of Badgers Act 1992

12

Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System


Written Question
Deer Act 1991
Thursday 13th October 2016

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, how many people were (a) prosecuted for and (b) convicted of offences under the Deer Act 1991 in 2015; and if he will make a statement.

Answered by Robert Buckland

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not maintain a central record of the number of people who have been charged with, and prosecuted for, offences brought by way of the Deer Act 1991. This information could only be obtained by examining CPS case files, which would incur disproportionate cost.

Although it is not possible to identify the number of people charged with particular offences, records are held showing the overall number of offences in which a prosecution commenced in the magistrates’ courts. The table below shows the number of offences, rather than defendants, charged by way of the Deer Act 1991 during 2015. A single defendant may be charged with more than one offence.

2015

Deer Act 1991

20

Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 29 Jan 2013
RSPCA (Prosecutions)

"Rather than worrying about whether the RSPCA is misusing its funds in bringing the prosecution, should we not as taxpayers be criticising the CPS for not being prepared to spend its funding on bringing fox-hunting prosecutions?..."
Kerry McCarthy - View Speech

View all Kerry McCarthy (Lab - Bristol East) contributions to the debate on: RSPCA (Prosecutions)