Information between 10th November 2025 - 20th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Lee Pitcher voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Cabinet Office
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (49 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Written Corrections Cabinet Office |
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Rogue Builders
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (82 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade |
|
Lee Pitcher speeches from: Nolan Principles
Lee Pitcher contributed 1 speech (46 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Bus Services: Franchises
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of bus franchising on community connectivity in rural villages. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government is committed to delivering better bus services, including in rural areas. We have set out a plan to achieve this based on giving local leaders the powers they need and empowering them to choose the service model that works best in their area, whether that be franchising, strengthened Enhanced Partnerships, or local authority bus companies.
Under franchised bus services, local authorities can assume responsibility for all elements of the bus network, including routes, timetables and fares. This can lead to improved levels of connectivity. There is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to franchising, and Government is engaging with Local Transport Authorities to identify potential alternative models of franchising that could be adopted and used by smaller or more rural authorities.
The Government has also allocated funding to five different areas to take forward bus franchising pilots. The pilots will test different franchising models to investigate how they can be implemented and deliver improved bus services for passengers, including in more rural locations. The pilots will provide funding, guidance, and practical resources to local transport authorities to identify the most suitable approach to bus franchising and wider bus reform measures. |
|
Armed Forces: Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether there are plans to build new service family accommodation in the constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Defence Housing Strategy sets out a vision for the future renewal of the Service family estate, backed by a 10-year programme of investment. Until the Strategy implementation plan is finalised, we are unable to confirm any future plans for new Service Family Accommodation in your constituency of Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme. |
|
Railways: Rural Areas
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment into the social value of increasing rail connectivity (a) in and (b) between rural and semi-rural areas. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Assessments of the social value of increasing rail connectivity (a) in and (b) between rural and semi-rural areas are calculated on a case-by-case basis to reflect local economic conditions, using Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG). As an aid to understanding the value of such connectivity between origins and destinations, the Department for Transport has developed the connectivity metric, which measures an individual’s ability to reach employment, services and social engagements. Connectivity evaluates the value of destinations and the opportunity to reach said destinations using various modes of transport, including walking, cycling, driving and public transport. It considers different purposes of travel, like employment, education, shopping, leisure and healthcare. Its value will vary widely across geographies or between locations.
In assessing the full social value of connectivity, the Connectivity tool is one method of gauging such potential value. However, this assessment must then take a holistic view as set out in TAG, including the guidance on assessment of the wider benefits of rail interventions including reduced road congestion, improved air quality and reduced carbon emissions.
|
|
Internet: Safety
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to ensure the Online Safety Act 2023 does not result in unintended consequences for (a) freedom of expression and (b) access to (i) supportive and (ii) archival online content. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Under the Act, both Ofcom and in-scope companies will have duties relating to freedom of expression, for which they can be held to account. Platforms will not be able to arbitrarily remove content and users will have access to effective complaints procedures to appeal instances when content is unduly taken down. This will ensure that UK users can express themselves freely online and participate in pluralistic and robust debate. |
|
Railways: Standards
Asked by: Lee Pitcher (Labour - Doncaster East and the Isle of Axholme) Tuesday 18th November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the adequacy of restoration of rail service levels to pre COVID-19 levels. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) We regularly review and publish passenger demand levels and work closely with operators to ensure they provide sufficient capacity to meet demand wherever possible. We have been clear with operators that they should meet demand in a manner that supports overall performance improvement and minimises the net subsidy taxpayers pay for rail. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Elections within the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025 2:30 p.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons At 2:45pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Scotland of Asthal KC, former Attorney General At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 10th December 2025 10 a.m. Procedure Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Work of the Leader of the House At 10:15am: Oral evidence Sir Alan Campbell, Leader of the House of Commons View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve KC, Rt. Hon. Sir Michael Ellis KBE, KC, and Sir Jeremy Wright Sub judice resolution in the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
|
Friday 14th November 2025
Written Evidence - The Electoral Commission EHC0023 - Elections within the House of Commons Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
|
Wednesday 19th November 2025
Oral Evidence - Peter Stanyon, Chief Executive, Association of Electoral Administrators Elections within the House of Commons - Procedure Committee |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Written Evidence - Rt Hon Alison Johnstone MSP, Presiding Officer, Scottish Parliament CLI0012 - Call lists Call lists - Procedure Committee |
|
Wednesday 3rd December 2025
Written Evidence - Rt Hon Elin Jones AS/MS, Llywydd (Presiding Officer), Senedd Cyrmu/Welsh Parliament CLI0013 - Call lists Call lists - Procedure Committee |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Nov 2025
Written Parliamentary Questions Procedure Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Written Parliamentary Questions (WPQs) are an important tool for Members of Parliament to obtain detailed and targeted information to aid in the scrutiny of Government policy and operations. The long-established purpose of WPQs is to uphold transparency and accountability by ensuring that the Government provides clear and timely information to Parliament, and to the public via their publication. Recent concerns have been raised that the present WPQ system has been coming under strain and not fully delivering on its intended purpose. This inquiry provides the opportunity to undertake a detailed review of WPQs, to look at their purpose, their use, and the processes that underpin them, in order to identify potential recommendations for improvement and reform. |