Work and Pensions

Liz Kendall Excerpts

Wednesday 16th July 2025 Written Corrections

[Calum Miller (Bicester and Woodstock) (LD)]

I recently met a support group in my constituency of those who suffer from ME, chronic fatigue syndrome or long covid. Their description of the devastating impact of those variable conditions was very affecting. If one of those people were to have an improvement in their condition, meaning that they were no longer eligible for PIP, and then to re-present for assessment, would they be entitled to return to the PIP level they were on previously, or would they be treated as new applicants under the terms the Secretary of State has described today?

[Liz Kendall]

The hon. Gentleman raises an important point, which is precisely what we want to look at in the PIP review, because it does not take into account fluctuating conditions. That is an important issue moving forward, and we will be absolutely determined to involve him, his constituents, and organisations that represent those with fluctuating conditions in the process of the review.

[Official Report, 30 June 2025; Vol. 770, c. 36.]

Written correction submitted by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, the right hon. Member for Leicester West (Liz Kendall):

[Liz Kendall]

The hon. Gentleman raises an important point. The PIP assessment takes into account fluctuating conditions. That is an important issue moving forward, and we will be absolutely determined to involve him, his constituents, and organisations that represent those with fluctuating conditions in the process of the review.

[Paul Holmes (Hamble Valley) (Con)]

I am sure that the Chancellor will be delighted that the flip-flopping of the Prime Minister means she has to find another £2.5 billion in taxation on people in this country. Does the Secretary of State think that it is fair that a two-tier system has been created? Why would anybody on the old rate seek work when they know that if they go into work, it does not work out and they claim again, they will get a reduced rate under her Government?

[Liz Kendall]

Because PIP is not an in-work benefit.

[Official Report, 30 June 2025; Vol. 770, c. 39.]

Written correction submitted by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions:

[Liz Kendall]

Because PIP is an in-work or out-of-work benefit.