To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 07 Mar 2017
Beer Duty

"I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman has mentioned St Austell —I am very partial to a pint of Clouded Yellow myself. A family brewery, John Willie Lees, is a major employer in my constituency. I fully support the comments that the hon. Gentleman is making about social drinking. I …..."
Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: Beer Duty

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 07 Mar 2017
Beer Duty

"I appreciate the point that the Minister is making about different rates of tax, but is it not true that minimum pricing for alcohol would apply only to alcohol sold in supermarkets and retail outlets, and not to alcoholic drinks sold in pubs? Is that not correct?..."
Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: Beer Duty

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 14 Dec 2016
Equality: Autumn Statement

"I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion) for securing this debate and for all the work she has done to highlight this important matter.

Since 2010, women have been hit three times harder by tax and benefit changes than men. Eighty-six per cent of tax and …..."

Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: Equality: Autumn Statement

Written Question
Fiscal Policy: Females
Tuesday 29th November 2016

Asked by: Liz McInnes (Labour - Heywood and Middleton)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to ensure that women are not disproportionately affected by the Government's fiscal policies.

Answered by Jane Ellison

The Government is helping more women than ever before to start businesses and get the support they need to work.

In the last parliament, 2.2 million women were taken out of income tax. This year’s increase in the personal allowance will lift over 680,000 further people out of income tax by 2017/18, of whom over 60% will be women.

Around two thirds of those who will benefit from the National Living Wage are estimated to be women.

The planned doubling of the free childcare entitlement for working families with three- and four-year-olds is worth up to £5,000 per child per year.

It is also equally important for the future finances of both women and men that the Government remains committed to tackling the deficit and strengthening the economy.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 28 Apr 2016
HMRC: Building our Future Plan

"It is my understanding from my experience as a trade union rep that it is compulsory to consult the trade unions when redundancies are announced, and that members of staff are entitled to have representation...."
Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: HMRC: Building our Future Plan

Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 26 Apr 2016
Fixed Odds Betting Terminals

"It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Sir Alan.

As a member of the newly formed APG on fixed odds betting terminals, I am pleased that the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon) secured this important debate. I also thank my hon. Friend the Member for Swansea East …..."

Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: Fixed Odds Betting Terminals

Written Question
Bradford and Bingley
Monday 21st March 2016

Asked by: Liz McInnes (Labour - Heywood and Middleton)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if his Department will investigate the collapse of Bradford and Bingley plc in 2008.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

The Government has no plans to conduct an investigation into the collapse of Bradford and Bingley plc in 2008.

The National Audit Office concluded in its report of 4 December 2009 that the public support provided to UK by the Treasury was justified, given the scale of both the economic and social costs if one or more major banks had collapsed. In providing that support, moreover, the Treasury met two of the government’s principal objectives: protecting depositors’ money in banks and maintaining the stability of the financial system.


Written Question
Bradford and Bingley
Thursday 10th March 2016

Asked by: Liz McInnes (Labour - Heywood and Middleton)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the financial loss to investors as a consequence of the collapse of the former Bradford and Bingley Building Society/Bank in 2008.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

In 2009 Peter Clokey of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was appointed as an independent valuer to consider whether shareholders and holders of rights associated with dated subordinated notes were entitled to compensation after the collapse of Bradford & Bingley. On 5 July 2010 he published his report setting out his determination that no compensation is due to former shareholders and bondholders. The case was referred to the Upper Tribunal who upheld the decision in 2012 and concluded that the valuer carried out his valuation function wholly in accordance with the Compensation Scheme.


Written Question
Bradford and Bingley
Thursday 10th March 2016

Asked by: Liz McInnes (Labour - Heywood and Middleton)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the financial loss to shareholders as a consequence of the collapse of the former Bradford and Bingley Building Society/Bank in 2008.

Answered by Harriett Baldwin - Shadow Minister (Business and Trade)

In 2009 Peter Clokey of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was appointed as an independent valuer to consider whether shareholders and holders of rights associated with dated subordinated notes were entitled to compensation after the collapse of Bradford & Bingley. On 5 July 2010 he published his report setting out his determination that no compensation is due to former shareholders and bondholders. The case was referred to the Upper Tribunal who upheld the decision in 2012 and concluded that the valuer carried out his valuation function wholly in accordance with the Compensation Scheme.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 11 Feb 2016
Short Money and Policy Development Grant

"These proposals come on the back of the Government’s attack on Labour’s funding via the Trade Union Bill. It is clearly part of a partisan move to hit the Opposition and give the Government an unfair advantage, while leaving their own funding base of big donors untouched. Can the Minister …..."
Liz McInnes - View Speech

View all Liz McInnes (Lab - Heywood and Middleton) contributions to the debate on: Short Money and Policy Development Grant