To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 03 Feb 2020
Oral Answers to Questions

"Since 2013, four men have been lost to their families following their deaths during Army training in the Brecon area. The parents of one of these men, Craig Roberts, are in the Gallery today. At the latest inquest, the coroner criticised the Minister’s Department, saying that lessons were not being …..."
Liz Saville Roberts - View Speech

View all Liz Saville Roberts (PC - Dwyfor Meirionnydd) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Written Question
Army: Recruitment
Thursday 30th January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many soldiers who enlisted aged (a) under 18 and (b) 18 or over dropped out of the army before completing their phase two training in the (i) 2015-16, (ii) 2016-17 and (iii) 2017-18 financial years.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

The requested information is provided below:

Untrained Regular Soldiers Outflow from 1st April 2015 to 1st April 2018 Split by Age on Enlistment

Number of untrained Regular soldiers outflow split by age group on enlistment

Financial Year of Outflow

Total

Under 18

18 and above

Total

5,650

1,650

3,860

2015-2016

2,020

550

1,470

2016-2017

1,840

540

1,300

2017-2018

1,790

570

1,220

Source: Defence Statistics (Army)

Notes/Caveats:

The figures are for the Regular Army, excluding Gurkhas, Full Time Reserve Service and Mobilised Reserves.

Untrained outflow refers to personnel who left the Regular Army before completing their trade training (phase 2).

Personnel outflow more than once in the last five financial years is counted as a separate outflow. Age on enlistment is similarly separately counted.

Age on enlistment is calculated using date of birth and entry date. There are known problems with the entry date information extracted from JPA which is supposed to reflect their 'current entry date' but if personnel have transferred to the Army from another Service, served under an alternative assignment type (e.g. reserve forces), are re-entrants or have transferred from Other Ranks to Officers, their entry date may correspond to any of these events.

The figures are for outflow of untrained Regular soldiers broken down by financial years. This table has been compiled based on the year of outflow rather than the year of inflow used as the base for previous publication.

For presentation purpose, figures have been rounded to 10; numbers ending in "5" have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias.

Totals and sub-totals have been rounded separately and so may not appear to be the sum of their parts.


Written Question
Army: Recruitment
Thursday 30th January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many applicants for enlistment into the Army were aged (a) under 18 and (b) 18 or over in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

Data is not available prior to 2013-14 as it was not collated centrally and so is unreliable.

Applications received to join the British Army from 1 April 2013 – 30 March 2019 are in the table below.

Recruiting Year

Under18 Applications

Over18 Applications

2013-14

14,910

74,666

2014-15

19,207

100,249

2015-16

17,876

96,678

2016-17

23,706

153,233

2017-18

21,288

114,381

2018-19

24,978

122,197

  • This data has been provided from a single service source rather than official statistics produced by Defence Statistics. This is because Defence Statistics do not start to record an individual until they attend their first day of basic training.

  • In order to generate the response, application data has been extracted at the earliest point an application is generated. This means that for the purpose of this question, if an individual generates multiple applications, they will be counted as multiple separate applications.

Written Question
Army: Recruitment
Thursday 30th January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many applicants to enlist in the army did not end up doing so; and for what reason, in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

Data is not available prior to 2013-14 as it was not collated centrally and so is unreliable.

Number of Applicants that did not end up joining the British Army between 1 April 2013 and 30 March 2019 are in the table below

Recruiting Year

Total withdrawn or rejected in pipeline

Main reason for the “withdrawal/rejection” in pipeline

2013-14

58,419

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

2014-15

79,114

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

2015-16

77,055

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

2016-17

120,314

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

2017-18

80,357

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

2018-19

116,312

Candidate Voluntarily disengaging from the process

  • This data has been provided from a single service source rather than official statistics produced by Defence Statistics. This is because Defence Statistics do not start to record individuals until they attend their first day of basic training.
  • Applications include all streams, including Commonwealth, Military Provost Guard Service (MPGS) and re-joiner.
  • Rejections/withdrawals are from all streams, including Commonwealth, MPGS and re-joiners.
  • In principle, a rejection arises when a candidate falls short of the required eligibility/assessment, whereas a withdrawal arises due to candidate choice.
  • Of the reasons for a candidate to withdraw/be rejected, the candidate ‘voluntarily disengaging from the process’ was the most common factor.
  • Candidates can voluntarily disengage from the process at any stage of the pipeline. There are circa 500 possible reasons candidates can provide for doing so.


Written Question
Army: Young People
Thursday 23rd January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the Answer of 7 October 2019 to Question 293678 on the Junior Entry Review, if he will place in the Library a copy of the Junior Entry Review Market Research final report, dated April 2018, referenced in the Junior Entry Review.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

A copy of the Junior Entry Review Market Research final report will be placed in the Library of the House shortly. It is currently being reviewed for commercial and personal data sensitivities.


Written Question
Military Aircraft: Wales
Thursday 23rd January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many incidents of (a) irresponsible and (b) reckless flying have been reported (a) on the Machynlleth Loop and (b) in Wales in each of the last five years; and what steps he is taking to ensure that pilots behave appropriately and responsibly.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

The information is not held in the format requested.

The Defence Flying Complaints Investigations Team (DFCIT) is charged with investigating instances of military low flying complaints reported by members of the public. The table below gives the number of investigations undertaken for the whole of Wales and the number of occasions that were identified as a breach of flying regulations.

Year

2017

2018

2019

Number of Investigations

10

12

4

Number of Breaches

0

1

0

All RAF pilots receive extensive training to ensure they operate in accordance with the appropriate low flying regulations and this training is re-emphasised throughout their careers. These stringent regulations are in place in order to protect the public, our aircrew and aircraft. All aspects of flight safety are kept under continuous review. Aircrew are not permitted to carry out manoeuvres beyond their proven capabilities, or those of the aircraft. All our pilots are constantly assessed to ensure that high standards of professionalism are maintained.


Written Question
Army: Recruitment
Monday 13th January 2020

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library a copy of the media buying brief for the 2020 army recruitment campaign.

Answered by Anne-Marie Trevelyan

The Media Buying Brief for the 2020 Army recruitment campaign will be placed in the Library of the House shortly. It is currently being reviewed for any commercial sensitivities.

The Army's 2020 campaign is designed to highlight how being in the Army gives personnel a strong sense of self-belief and confidence that few other careers can. Early indications are that this campaign has been received well, with strong early January application numbers.


Written Question
Army: Young People
Monday 7th October 2019

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the Army’s review of Junior entry has been completed; and if he will place a copy of that review in the Library.

Answered by Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton

The Army's review of Junior Entry (JE) enlistment has concluded. The Armed Forces offer some of the best training and education to people anywhere in society. Those opportunities begin at 16 with around 1,300 Junior Soldiers graduating from Harrogate each year. The Army Foundation College at Harrogate is the only JE Phase 1 training establishment in the British Army and the JE is a tried and trusted means of engaging young people leading them to a successful Army career. The college aims to create a well-rounded junior soldier, physically, conceptually and morally. The delivery of training is conducted in accordance with a carefully synchronised college programme and is aimed to be progressive and provide variety with a balance between classroom, camp and field training.

This review considered how the Army can continue to attract the best young people under the age of 18 and, in doing so, maximise the talent of the individual to the mutual benefit of the individual, the Army and society improving their social mobility. The tendency for under-18 recruits to serve for longer than their over-18 peers and the relatively high proportion of junior entrants that promote to senior NCO ranks over the course of their careers benefits the Army and the individual.

The Review found that while the JE scheme is performing well and remains attractive to potential recruits, it is not well known and could be advertised more effectively. To recruit effectively the JE model must appeal to all, including females and the growing Black Asian and Minority Ethnic workforce in the UK.

A copy of the report of the Army's review of JE enlistment will be placed in the Library of the House.


Written Question
Armed Forces: Schools
Monday 9th September 2019

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many visits representatives from the (a) Army, (b) Royal Navy and (c) Royal Air Force made to schools and colleges in (i) Wales, (ii) Scotland, (iii) England and (iv) Northern Ireland in the financial years (A) 2017-18 and (B) 2018-19.

Answered by Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton

The Armed Forces only visit schools and colleges when they have been invited to support activities. No visits to schools by the Armed Forces are directly linked to recruitment, other than specific careers/jobs fairs which generally involve a range of employers. While presentations may be given highlighting the careers available in the Armed Forces, no pupil is able to make a commitment to become a recruit in the Armed Forces during the course of a visit. The visits cover a range of activities such as career events, citizenship talks, science and maths challenges and other indoor or outdoor exercises. The purpose of the visit is always agreed in advance.

In the academic year 2017-18, centrally held records indicate that the Navy conducted an estimated 3,240 school visits and the Army carried out 4,710 visits. Records held by the Royal Air Force (RAF) indicate that in the period 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018 the RAF visited 2,310 schools.

It will take time to collate the information for 2018-19 and to establish whether the figures can be broken down by country. I will write to the hon. Member when these enquiries are complete.


Written Question
Army: Recruitment
Tuesday 30th April 2019

Asked by: Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru - Dwyfor Meirionnydd)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many walk-ins there were to each Army Careers Centre in the last financial year.

Answered by Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton

The information is not held in the format requested. While some Army Career Centres may record some data locally, this will not be consistent or comparable with other sites.