Planning and Infrastructure Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Katz
Main Page: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Katz's debates with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
(1 day, 23 hours ago)
Lords ChamberBefore we proceed, the Government Whip will make a brief statement about the progress of business.
My Lords, I thank the Deputy Chairman of Committees. Just to confirm, we will be going to target this evening, so I urge brevity from everybody in making speeches, so that we can make progress and get through the business.
I am tempted to make a 10-minute speech in response to that. If the Government decide they want to go to such a ridiculous length, it really is for the Government to—
I apologise. I should have added that it was agreed through the usual channels, with the Front Benches, that that would be an appropriate way to arrange business.
My Lords, I accept that it has been agreed by the usual channels, but this is a revising Chamber and we are supposed to be looking at a serious Bill and taking its provisions seriously. If the Government want to get through 20 groups today then it will take the time it takes. None the less, when it comes to Amendment 135G, I shall be brief.
The main reason I hear for planning processes taking longer than they should is that planning authorities take longer than they should. The Government should have the power to do something about that, and that is what my amendment seeks to achieve.