House of Lords Reform Bill [HL] Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Northern Ireland Office
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
Main Page: Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market's debates with the Northern Ireland Office
House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market Excerpts(12 years, 6 months ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Colwyn)
My Lords, in one briefing the two amendments are grouped together and in another they are separate. Is it your Lordships’ pleasure that the amendment be agreed to?
Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market
The amendment says “under section” but there is no section. Therefore, it falls if Amendment 128 is not agreed to.
The Earl of Caithness
My Lords, I apologise. I am absolutely certain that my noble friend Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market is right. This shows the slight confusion that we are in as a result of the earlier Motion. Therefore, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.