Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business and Trade
Viscount Camrose Portrait Viscount Camrose (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I believe that is the case and I accept that. But, as I said, I will commit to carrying out a review in the future to understand how best to implement a collective action basis.

Under the digital markets regime, the CMA will be—

Lord Tyrie Portrait Lord Tyrie (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - -

Can the Minister tell us when he intends that review to take place?

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Tyrie Portrait Lord Tyrie (Non-Afl)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I have tabled Amendments 65 and 153. I declare my interests, as I did in Committee and as I have set out in the register. I also declare an interest in the Bill, since I had a hand in constructing it. I can never make up my mind whether I should be declaring victory and moving on, or flagging up further improvements. I have decided to take the latter course. Unfortunately, as on a previous occasion, it falls to me to come between a number of colleagues and their dinner, so I will do my best to be brief—although there are a number of things I need to say.

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Tyrie Portrait Lord Tyrie (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - -

Can the Minister say whether “shortly” is the same as “quickly”, and whether it will be a comprehensive examination of the subjects or just picking off a small number of areas? What exactly is it looking at?

Lord Clement-Jones Portrait Lord Clement-Jones (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Before the Minister stands up, I will add to that. The Minister used the word “research”, which I thought was extraordinary. “Research” is a flabby kind of expression in these circumstances. Do the Government intend to review the current state of whistleblowing with a view to ensuring there is a more comprehensive approach to it, or is this just some nice-to-have academic exercise?