To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Evans (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 266
Written Question
Drugs: VAT
Wednesday 10th June 2026

Asked by: Luke Evans (Conservative - Hinckley and Bosworth)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential risk that pharmaceutical companies could withdraw compassionate access programmes due to VAT-related financial pressures.

Answered by Preet Kaur Gill - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government recognises the important role that compassionate and expanded access programmes can play in enabling patients, particularly those with serious or rare conditions, to access innovative medicines outside routine commissioning arrangements.

VAT treatment in the United Kingdom is governed by long-standing principles, including that where goods are supplied for non-business purposes or free of charge in certain circumstances, a taxable supply may arise. There is no specific VAT exemption for medicines provided through compassionate or expanded access programmes.

The Department has not made a formal assessment of the risk that pharmaceutical companies may withdraw such programmes specifically due to VAT-related costs. However, we are aware of concerns raised by industry and stakeholders about the potential impact on patient access.

We continue to engage with HM Treasury, HM Revenue and Customs, and the pharmaceutical industry to understand these issues and their implications for patients.


Written Question
Pets: Export Health Certificates
Wednesday 10th June 2026

Asked by: Luke Evans (Conservative - Hinckley and Bosworth)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 27 May 2026 to Question 286 on Pets: EU Countries, if she will have discussions with Improve International to consider opportunities to increase the number of official veterinarians who are able to issue Animal Health Certificates.

Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

There are currently no plans to hold any discussions with Improve International on the number of Official Veterinarians who can issue Animal Health Certificates.

Defra is aware of the numerous challenges facing the veterinary sector, including recruitment and retention of qualified veterinary surgeons. Defra officials are working with the sector to increase capacity, for example through reform of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966, which will enable more activities to be delegated to other members of the veterinary team. This will give veterinary surgeons more time to undertake other activities including, if they wish, Official Veterinarian duties.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"Last month, the Health Service Journal reported that the elective waiting list target was met largely—largely—because a record number of patients were removed from waiting lists in March without receiving treatment. Can the Minister tell the House how many patients were removed in March and what happened to them, and …..."
Luke Evans - View Speech

View all Luke Evans (Con - Hinckley and Bosworth) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 09 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions

"It is not just the Conservatives who are raising this issue; it is patients and the Health Service Journal. The answer is that 350,000 people—a city the size of Coventry—were wiped off the waiting list with no treatment, and that is 100,000 more than the month before. If there …..."
Luke Evans - View Speech

View all Luke Evans (Con - Hinckley and Bosworth) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Luke Evans (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 79 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 86
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Evans (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Evans (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 297
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context
Luke Evans (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 290
Written Question
Steroid Drugs: Young People
Tuesday 9th June 2026

Asked by: Luke Evans (Conservative - Hinckley and Bosworth)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he will have conversations with colleagues in the [i] Department for Culture and Media and Sport and [ii] Department for Science and Technology about the impact of social media content on the use of IPEDs and SARMs amongst young people.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government recognises the mental and physical health risks of young people taking steroids. This Government is committed to raising the healthiest generation of children ever and to exploring options, through the cross-government National Youth Strategy, to improve young people’s access to accurate health information, both online and offline.

While no assessment has currently been made about the reasons for the use of image and performance enhancing drugs (IPEDs) and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) amongst young people. Treatment for IPED or steroid use within drug and alcohol treatment services is available, depending on local commissioning arrangements. The Government also runs Talk to FRANK, a drug and alcohol information and advice service for young people, parents and others concerned about drug use. The website includes information on the mental and physical health risks of steroid use and is updated regularly. More information is available at the following link:

https://www.talktofrank.com/

The Department of Health and Social Care is working closely with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology on its consultation, ‘Growing up in the online world’, which closes on 26 May 2026. This consultation will help inform future policy to better protect children’s health and wellbeing and ensure that digital platforms play their part in promoting safe and healthy online experiences.

We are also taking a range of actions to improve men’s health literacy, as set out in the Men’s Health Strategy. These include:

  • ensuring health literacy improvements are embedded at community level;
  • building the evidence base on health literacy in men;
  • working closely with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; and
  • identifying ways to build media literacy skills in men to help them critically assess health information and protect against misinformation that harms health.