Information between 12th October 2026 - 22nd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 13 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [LORDS] (Second sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 8 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [HL] (First sitting) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 11 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Luke Murphy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Luke Murphy speeches from: Nepal: UK Government Support
Luke Murphy contributed 1 speech (914 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
Luke Murphy speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Luke Murphy contributed 2 speeches (112 words) Monday 12th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Rare Diseases: Health Services
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what her Department's policy is on the future of the Rare Disease Collaborative Networks; and whether the NHS will to continue to support their work in improving access to specialist expertise and care for people living with rare diseases. Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England has completed its review of Rare Disease Collaborative Networks (RDCNs) and communicated the findings and next steps to existing networks. The review confirmed the important value of RDCNs in connecting specialist expertise and supporting improved pathways, earlier diagnosis, care coordination, and more equitable access to expert advice. NHS England will continue to support the work of RDCNs, with a focus on supporting collaboration, promoting learning, increasing visibility, and use of data and registries. |
|
UK Relations with EU: Pet Travel Scheme
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the end of the EU Pet Travel Scheme on UK pet owners travelling to the EU; and whether the movement of pets will form part of discussions on strengthening the UK's trading relationship with the EU. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This Government remains committed to concluding the SPS agreement ahead of the next UK-EU Summit on 20 November 2026. Instead of getting an Animal Health Certificate each time they travel, pet owners will be able to get a multiuse pet passport valid for travel to the EU. |
|
Children: Disability
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what criteria local authorities are expected to apply when assessing eligibility for overnight respite care for disabled children, and whether her Department holds data on regional variation in approval rates. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Local authorities are responsible for assessing the needs of disabled children in their area and deciding what services should be provided to meet those needs. There is no nationally prescribed set of eligibility criteria for overnight respite care. Decisions are made by local authorities based on an assessment of the individual child and family's needs and their statutory duties under the Children Act 1989. The department’s guidance 'Short breaks for carers of disabled children' makes clear that local authorities should provide a range of short break services to meet local needs and publish information about the services available. Decisions about access to specific services, including overnight respite care, are for local authorities to make based on individual assessments. The department does not hold data on access to overnight respite care for disabled children and does not collect information on regional variation in access to such care. |
|
Children: Disability
Asked by: Luke Murphy (Labour - Basingstoke) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate she has made of the average waiting time for children with disabilities to receive an occupational therapy home safety assessment from local authority Children's Social Care teams. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The department has not made an estimate of the average waiting time for children with disabilities to receive an occupational therapy home safety assessment from local authority children's social care teams. Responsibility for assessing and meeting the needs of disabled children rests with local authorities, which determine local arrangements for the provision of occupational therapy assessments and support. The department does not collect data on waiting times for occupational therapy home safety assessments delivered by local authority children's social care teams, NHS England publishes waiting-list and waiting-time data for community health services, including children's occupational therapy services. This data does not identify waiting times for local authority children's social care occupational therapy assessments specifically. Statutory guidance is clear that children's social care assessments should be undertaken in a timely manner, with the pace of assessment determined by the child's individual needs and circumstances. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
20 Oct 2026, 9:51 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy, no. " Speaker 9 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 10:23 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 10 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 10:25 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 10 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 10:44 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 11 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 11:32 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 3 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 5:38 p.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 3 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 3:04 p.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 11 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 3:35 p.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 11 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 4:57 p.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 3 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 5 p.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 3 - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Oct 2026, 10:43 a.m. - Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill "Luke Murphy no. " Speaker 11 - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Nepal: UK Government Support
26 speeches (12,369 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Matt Rodda (Lab - Reading Central) Woodley (Yuan Yang), for Aldershot (Alex Baker), for Bracknell (Peter Swallow), for Basingstoke (Luke Murphy - Link to Speech 2: David Reed (Con - Exmouth and Exeter East) Member for Basingstoke (Luke Murphy) talked about acts of heroism, large and small, both in Nepal and - Link to Speech 3: Chris Elmore (Lab - Bridgend) Friends the Members for Harrow West (Gareth Thomas) and for Basingstoke (Luke Murphy), mentioned the - Link to Speech |