Information between 6th January 2026 - 16th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 94 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Mark Garnier speeches from: Bromsgrove: Local Government
Mark Garnier contributed 2 speeches (141 words) Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
State Retirement Pensions: Income Tax
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer on 8 December 2025 to Question 96643, whether she has any plans to require pensioners who received the state pension as their only income and consequently inherit part of (a) the basic state pension, (b) the additional state pension and (c) the new state pension following the death of their spouse or civil partner to pay income tax. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) As set out in my reply to Question 96643, the Chancellor has said that those whose only income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments will not have to pay income tax over this Parliament. At the Budget, the Government announced that it will achieve this by easing the administrative burden for pensioners so that they do not have to pay small amounts of tax via Simple Assessment from 2027/28. The Government will set out more detail in due course. |
|
State Retirement Pensions: Income Tax
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer on 8 December 2025 to Question 96643, whether she has any plans to require pensioners who receive both the basic state pension and the additional state pension as their only income to pay income tax. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) As set out in my reply to Question 96643, the Chancellor has said that those whose only income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments will not have to pay income tax over this Parliament. At the Budget, the Government announced that it will achieve this by easing the administrative burden for pensioners so that they do not have to pay small amounts of tax via Simple Assessment from 2027/28. The Government will set out more detail in due course. |
|
Ground Rent
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, when he plans to publish the Government’s response to the consultation entitled ‘Modern leasehold: restricting ground rent for existing leases’ published on 9 November 2023. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 99005 on 5 January 2026. |
|
Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, when he will bring forward secondary legislation to implement the core elements of the Act. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government has already made significant progress when it comes to commencing provisions in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024:
The government recognises the considerable financial strain that rising service charges place on leaseholders and tenants. The level of service charge that leaseholders pay depends on many factors, including the terms of a lease and the age and condition of a building. By law, variable service charges must be reasonable. Overcharging through service charges is completely unacceptable. Should leaseholders wish to contest the reasonableness of their service charges they may make an application to the appropriate tribunal.
On 4 July 2025, the government published a consultation, jointly with the Welsh Government, on strengthening leaseholder protections over charges and services. The consultation included proposals to increase transparency over service charges and enhance access to redress through the relevant provisions in the Act. It also proposed new reforms the section 20 ‘major works’ procedure. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here. It closed on 26 September 2025, and we are analysing responses with a view to bringing the relevant measures into force as quickly as possible.
On 18 December 2025, the government launched a consultation on proposals to implement the Act’s new consumer protections for homeowners living on freehold estates. These include ensuring that homeowners who pay an estate management charge have better access to information they need to understand what they are paying for, the right to challenge the reasonableness at the First-tier Tribunal (in England), and to go to the tribunal to appoint a substitute manager. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here and will remain open for responses until 12 March 2026. We will look to bring these measures into force as quickly as possible thereafter.
The Act also sets the method for calculating the price of a statutory lease extension or freehold acquisition, known as the valuation process. It removes the requirement for marriage value to be paid, caps the treatment of ground rents in the valuation calculation at 0.1% of the freehold value, and allows government to prescribe the rates used to calculate the enfranchisement premium. Valuation rates used to calculate the enfranchisement premium will be set by the Secretary of State in secondary legislation. We will consult on valuation rates and commence the relevant provisions as soon as possible. As per my Written Ministerial Statement of 21 November 2024 (HCWS244), primary legislation will be required to rectify a small number of specific flaws in the 2024 Act before the Act’s enfranchisement provisions are commenced. |
|
National Leasehold Campaign
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what recent discussions he has had with the National Leasehold Campaign. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) MHCLG Ministers and officials engage regularly with a range of stakeholders in respect of leasehold and commonhold reform, including the National Leasehold Campaign. |
|
Commonhold and Leasehold: Reform
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he plans to publish the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill before the end of the 2024-26 parliamentary session. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 102833 on 12 January 2026. |
|
Commonhold and Leasehold: Reform
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) Wednesday 14th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether Plotland sites will be included within the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Members to the answer given to Question UIN 102833 on 12 January 2026. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to Qatar between 19 May 2025 and 23 May 2025 Source |
|
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 24 May 2024 - £15,000.00 Source |
|
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 02 June 2025 - £2,000.00 Source |
|
5th January 2026
Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to China between 05 January 2025 and 10 January 2025 Source |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Planning applications in Stourport-on-Severn
0 speeches (None words) Thursday 8th January 2026 - Petitions Mentions: 1: None —[Presented by Mark Garnier, Official Report, 11 November 2025; Vol. 775, c. 130.] - Link to Speech |