Mark Garnier Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Mark Garnier

Information between 8th September 2025 - 18th October 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292
16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87
10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300
9 Sep 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 104 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179
9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333
9 Sep 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 3
9 Sep 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9
9 Sep 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill (Fifth sitting) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 8
11 Sep 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 8
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333
14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 339
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319
15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Garnier voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 86 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324


Speeches
Mark Garnier speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill (Seventh sitting)
Mark Garnier contributed 3 speeches (1,200 words)
Committee stage: 7th sitting
Thursday 11th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mark Garnier speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill (Eighth sitting)
Mark Garnier contributed 12 speeches (3,380 words)
Committee stage: 8th sitting
Thursday 11th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mark Garnier speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mark Garnier contributed 1 speech (155 words)
Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury
Mark Garnier speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill (Fifth sitting)
Mark Garnier contributed 15 speeches (2,785 words)
Committee stage: 5th sitting
Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mark Garnier speeches from: Pension Schemes Bill (Sixth sitting)
Mark Garnier contributed 5 speeches (1,271 words)
Committee stage: 6th sitting
Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mark Garnier speeches from: Draft Markets in Financial Instruments (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2025 Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2025
Mark Garnier contributed 2 speeches (624 words)
Monday 8th September 2025 - General Committees
HM Treasury


Written Answers
Digital Assets
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Tuesday 16th September 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her department has made an assessment of the benefits of tokenised financial infrastructure.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

Using distributed ledger technology to tokenise assets could deliver a step change in financial market efficiency, particularly by enabling more efficient, real-time data sharing which could lower operational costs and enhance resilience.

It is important that the government works with the financial services regulators and the sector to understand and deliver these benefits. That is why the government has published its Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy and why it has taken forward the Digital Securities Sandbox which will facilitate the issuance, trading and settlement of tokenised securities in the UK on distributed ledgers. It is also taking forward other initiatives such as the Digital Gilt Instrument, or ‘DIGIT’, which will help demonstrate the benefits of these new technologies.

Blockchain and Digital Assets
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Tuesday 16th September 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether it will be a formal requirement for the Digital Markets Champion to have a strong proficiency in (a) blockchain and (b) digital assets.

Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury)

On July 15th the government published the Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy. The strategy announced that the government will appointing an industry expert as Digital Markets Champion, who will provide leadership from, and for, the sector on wholesale market digitalisation. The government is working at pace to identify and appoint a suitable candidate for the role and will provide an update in due course.

Workplace Pensions: Young People
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 8th September 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of extending pensions automatic enrolment to jobholders under the age of 22 on those people.

Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

We are committed to ensuring people achieve financial security in later life.

That is why we prioritised the Pensions Investment Review and reforms in the Pension Schemes Bill – so that we can be confident savers automatically enrolled into workplace pension schemes can rightly enjoy the best possible outcomes.

Our assessment of the pensions system is that the job is only half finished. In August we published a detailed report with our analysis, including on Automatic Enrolment and those groups not benefitting from pensions or undersaving. Furthermore, we have revived the Pensions Commission to address these very matters of adequacy, fairness and sustainability, especially for lower earners.

Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act 2023
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 8th September 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act 2023.

Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

We are committed to ensuring people achieve financial security in later life.

That is why we prioritised the Pensions Investment Review and reforms in the Pension Schemes Bill – so that we can be confident savers automatically enrolled into workplace pension schemes can rightly enjoy the best possible outcomes.

Our assessment of the pensions system is that the job is only half finished. In August we published a detailed report with our analysis, including on Automatic Enrolment and those groups not benefitting from pensions or undersaving. Furthermore, we have revived the Pensions Commission to address these very matters of adequacy, fairness and sustainability, especially for lower earners.

Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act 2023
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Monday 8th September 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether she plans to implement the Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act 2023.

Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury)

We are committed to ensuring people achieve financial security in later life.

That is why we prioritised the Pensions Investment Review and reforms in the Pension Schemes Bill – so that we can be confident savers automatically enrolled into workplace pension schemes can rightly enjoy the best possible outcomes.

Our assessment of the pensions system is that the job is only half finished. In August we published a detailed report with our analysis, including on Automatic Enrolment and those groups not benefitting from pensions or undersaving. Furthermore, we have revived the Pensions Commission to address these very matters of adequacy, fairness and sustainability, especially for lower earners.

Sexual Offences: Trials
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 10th September 2025

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Justice Act 1999, what steps she is taking to ensure court proceedings in sexual cases are not repeatedly adjourned.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

The Ministry of Justice’s 2025 impact evaluation of section 28 found that, between January 2019 and September 2022, victims were able to give evidence around five months before the trial. Although trials began one month later on average, the analysis was unable to examine the specific factors causing this delay. While section 28 hearings can occasionally affect scheduling – such as requiring a barrister to leave another trial – the evaluation found no discernible effect on the number of trials that are cancelled or rescheduled as a result of the measure.

The progression of a case through the courts is a matter for the judiciary. Listing and case management decisions are made by the judiciary in collaboration with court listing officers, who prioritise cases involving vulnerable witnesses, including those involving serious sexual offences. To support this, HMCTS has introduced measures such as a national forum for listing officers to share best practice.

Trials
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 10th September 2025

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, what steps she is taking to ensure that (a) victims and (b) witnesses are supported following their pre-recorded evidence.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

Following the recording of section 28 evidence, victims and witnesses are supported through ongoing contact from Witness Care Units. They are offered access to specialist emotional and practical support services, including counselling where appropriate, to help them manage the impact of their experience. In line with their rights under the Victims’ Code, they also receive clear and timely updates on case progress and outcomes.

The Ministry of Justice provides funding for victim and witness support services, including ringfenced funding for sexual violence and domestic abuse services.

Sexual Offences: Trials
Asked by: Mark Garnier (Conservative - Wyre Forest)
Wednesday 10th September 2025

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Justice Act 1999, whether she has had discussions with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Women and Safeguarding on the use of pre-recorded evidence in cases of (a) sexual assault and (b) rape.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

The Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls regularly meets with the Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls to discuss shared priorities. These discussions ensure close collaboration across portfolios and a continued focus on improving support for victims throughout the criminal justice process.




Mark Garnier mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Pension Schemes Bill (Eighth sitting)
104 speeches (20,845 words)
Committee stage: 8th sitting
Thursday 11th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Torsten Bell (Lab - Swansea West) —(Mark Garnier.)This new clause would require the Government to commission a report on the impact on - Link to Speech
2: Mark Garnier (Con - Wyre Forest) —(Mark Garnier.)This new clause would require the Secretary of State to prepare a report on the impact - Link to Speech
3: Mark Garnier (Con - Wyre Forest) —(Mark Garnier.)Brought up, and read the First time. - Link to Speech

Pension Schemes Bill (Sixth sitting)
101 speeches (20,773 words)
Committee stage: 6th sitting
Tuesday 9th September 2025 - Public Bill Committees
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Torsten Bell (Lab - Swansea West) —(Mark Garnier.)This amendment would ensure that the prescribed percentage of asset allocation would - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 10th September 2025
Report - 3rd Report - Scotland’s space sector follow-up: launch

Scottish Affairs Committee

Found: concerns were raised about the lack of clear leadership for space within the UK Government.205 Mark Garnier



Bill Documents
Sep. 11 2025
Public Bill Committee Proceedings as at 11 September 2025
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Negatived on division_247 Mark Garnier .

Sep. 11 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 11 September 2025
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: _NC31 Mark Garnier .

Sep. 10 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 September 2025
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: _NC31 Mark Garnier .

Sep. 09 2025
All proceedings up to 9 September 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26
Bill proceedings: Commons

Found: Withdrawn after debate_245 Mark Garnier .

Sep. 09 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 9 September 2025
Pension Schemes Bill 2024-26
Amendment Paper

Found: _248 Mark Garnier .



Non-Departmental Publications - News and Communications
Sep. 12 2025
Environment Agency
Source Page: Major flood risk management scheme completed in Bewdley
Document: Major flood risk management scheme completed in Bewdley (webpage)
News and Communications

Found: The scheme was opened by Mark Garnier MP for Wyre Forest.