Information between 12th January 2026 - 1st February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 127 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
21 Jan 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 326 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Matt Bishop voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Matt Bishop speeches from: Police Reform White Paper
Matt Bishop contributed 1 speech (92 words) Monday 26th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
|
Matt Bishop speeches from: Sentencing Bill
Matt Bishop contributed 1 speech (84 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Tuesday 20th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Matt Bishop speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Matt Bishop contributed 1 speech (83 words) Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Health Services: Children
Asked by: Matt Bishop (Labour - Forest of Dean) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to ensure specialist emotional and practical support is available for parents caring for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) We recognise the challenges families caring for a seriously ill child face, which is why NHS England have published statutory guidance and service specifications on commissioning children’s palliative care and end of life care. This specifically references access to emotional support and practical advice for parents and loved ones. Local authorities and ICBs jointly commission short‑breaks packages for children with life‑limiting conditions, and provide respite care where necessary. Additionally, from April 2025, the Carer’s Allowance earnings limit increased from £151 a week to £196 to support carers. The Minister for Care also chairs a cross-government meeting with DWP, DBT and DfE ministers to consider how we can provide carers with better recognition and support. |
|
Artificial Intelligence: Pornography
Asked by: Matt Bishop (Labour - Forest of Dean) Monday 26th January 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the potential merits of making UK AISI / Thorn's guidance entitled Recommended Practice for AI-G CSEA Prevention, published in December 2025, mandatory for AI developers to prevent the creation of AI-generated child sexual abuse material. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government recognises the importance of tackling AI-generated CSAM. Creating, possessing, or distributing CSAM, including AI Generated CSAM, is illegal. The Online Safety Act requires services to proactively identify and remove this content. We are taking further action in the Crime and Policing Bill to criminalise CSAM image generators, and to ensure AI developers can directly test for and address vulnerabilities in their models which enable the production of CSAM. The AISI / Thorn joint publication guidance (Recommended Practice for AI-G CSEA Prevention) sets out practical steps that AI developers, model hosting services and others in the AI ecosystem can take to reduce the risk that their systems are misused to generate CSAM. This guidance is informed by input from industry and child protection organisations, and many of the world’s leading AI developers (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta) have signed up to the principles of earlier forms of this guidance.
The Government is clear: no option is off the table when it comes to protecting the online safety of users in the UK. |
|
Pupil Premium: Universal Credit
Asked by: Matt Bishop (Labour - Forest of Dean) Friday 30th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department plans to review the eligibility criteria for pupil premium funding so that all children from families receiving Universal Credit are entitled to support. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) This government is committed to breaking down barriers to opportunity so that all our children have the freedom to achieve and thrive in education.
We are providing over £3 billion of pupil premium funding in financial year 2025/26 to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in state-funded schools in England.
Pupil premium is allocated on the basis of economic disadvantage, using free school meals claims, and to support children looked after or previously looked after by their local authority
Pupil premium will continue to be allocated using the current free school meals threshold of £7,400 for financial year 2026/27.
Over the longer term, we are reviewing how we allocate pupil premium and related funding to schools and local authorities to ensure it is targeted to those who need it most, while maintaining the overall amount we spend on these funding streams.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
26 Jan 2026, 4:58 p.m. - House of Commons " Direct Matt Bishop. " Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood KC MP, The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Birmingham Ladywood, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Jan 2026, 12:41 p.m. - House of Commons "write to me with the clear details? And I'm sure that then we can ensure that officials take this up as a matter of urgency. >> Matt Bishop. >> Thank you, Mr. Speaker. " Sarah Bool MP (South Northamptonshire, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 30th January 2026
Special Report - 4th Special Report - Ending the cycle of reoffending – part one: rehabilitation in prisons: Government Response Justice Committee Found: Current membership Andy Slaughter (Labour; Hammersmith and Chiswick) (Chair) Matt Bishop (Labour; Forest |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 2 p.m. Justice Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Rehabilitation and resettlement: ending the cycle of reoffending At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Rosie Brown - Chief Executive at COOK, and Chair at Ministry of Justice National Oversight Board for Employment Alex Clarke - Policy Officer at Working Chance David Apparicio MBE - Chief Executive at Chrysalis Foundation, and Chief Executive at The Corbett Network At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Ms Penelope Gibbs - Director at Transform Justice Paula Harriott - Chief Executive at Unlock View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 2 p.m. Justice Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to Justice At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Linda Mulcahy - Professor of Socio-Legal Studies at Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford, and Collaborator at The Access to Justice Foundation At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Liz Bayram - Chief Executive at Advice UK Dr Philip Drake - Director at Manchester Justice Hub Dr Lisa Wintersteiger - Chief Executive at Advicenow (formerly known as Law for Life) Mr Nimrod Ben-Cnaan - Head of Policy and Profile at Law Centres Network View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
12 Jan 2026
Children and Young Adults in the Secure Estate Justice Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Justice Committee has launched an inquiry into children and young adults in the secure estate in England and Wales to determine if the current system effectively prevents offending while upholding a "child-first" approach. The inquiry will scrutinise the various types of secure settings and the suitability and safety of these environments. We will explore the drivers behind high levels of self-harm, poor mental health and the use of physical restraint. This inquiry will also consider the transition of young people into the adult estate upon turning 18. We will also examine whether the current adult prison environment is appropriate for meeting the developmental, welfare and rehabilitative needs of young adults aged 18 to 25. Read the Call for Evidence to learn more about this Inquiry. |