Information between 15th April 2026 - 25th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Open Banking: Conditions of Employment
Asked by: Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has had discussions with the CMA9 banks on the potential impact of reported employment practices at Open Banking Limited on public and industry confidence in the Open Banking and Open Finance framework. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is responsible for ensuring that the obligations under Part 2 of the Retail Banking Market Investigation Order (the Order), and the accompanying Agreed Arrangements, are satisfied. The Government is aware that Open Banking Limited (OBL) has recently conducted a review of its settlement agreements and sought external legal advice to ensure that these are legally compliant.
For the future, the Government has committed to establish a long-term regulatory framework to support the growth of UK Open Banking. This will provide the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with powers to regulate Open Banking – including FCA oversight of a so-called ‘Future Entity’ which will take on the functions currently carried out by OBL under the Order. Treasury officials are engaging with the CMA to inform the design of this future framework.
In due course, the Government will consult on its legislative approach, including the powers it intends to provide the FCA to ensure it can effectively oversee the Open Banking ecosystem and its participants.
|
|
Open Banking
Asked by: Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has held discussions with the Competition and Markets Authority on the adequacy of Open Banking Limited's governance and accountability arrangements in the context of its role in open banking or the open finance framework. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is responsible for ensuring that the obligations under Part 2 of the Retail Banking Market Investigation Order (the Order), and the accompanying Agreed Arrangements, are satisfied. The Government is aware that Open Banking Limited (OBL) has recently conducted a review of its settlement agreements and sought external legal advice to ensure that these are legally compliant.
For the future, the Government has committed to establish a long-term regulatory framework to support the growth of UK Open Banking. This will provide the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with powers to regulate Open Banking – including FCA oversight of a so-called ‘Future Entity’ which will take on the functions currently carried out by OBL under the Order. Treasury officials are engaging with the CMA to inform the design of this future framework.
In due course, the Government will consult on its legislative approach, including the powers it intends to provide the FCA to ensure it can effectively oversee the Open Banking ecosystem and its participants.
|
|
Financial Services: Regulation
Asked by: Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what role her Department has in (a) monitoring and (b) supporting the governance and accountability of bodies established following Competition and Markets Authority remedies, where those bodies are funded by regulated firms including the CMA9 banks. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is responsible for ensuring that the obligations under Part 2 of the Retail Banking Market Investigation Order (the Order), and the accompanying Agreed Arrangements, are satisfied. The Government is aware that Open Banking Limited (OBL) has recently conducted a review of its settlement agreements and sought external legal advice to ensure that these are legally compliant.
For the future, the Government has committed to establish a long-term regulatory framework to support the growth of UK Open Banking. This will provide the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with powers to regulate Open Banking – including FCA oversight of a so-called ‘Future Entity’ which will take on the functions currently carried out by OBL under the Order. Treasury officials are engaging with the CMA to inform the design of this future framework.
In due course, the Government will consult on its legislative approach, including the powers it intends to provide the FCA to ensure it can effectively oversee the Open Banking ecosystem and its participants.
|
|
Open Banking
Asked by: Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that decisions relating to the future regulatory framework for Open Banking and Open Finance reflect high standards of governance, transparency, and employment protections. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is responsible for ensuring that the obligations under Part 2 of the Retail Banking Market Investigation Order (the Order), and the accompanying Agreed Arrangements, are satisfied. The Government is aware that Open Banking Limited (OBL) has recently conducted a review of its settlement agreements and sought external legal advice to ensure that these are legally compliant.
For the future, the Government has committed to establish a long-term regulatory framework to support the growth of UK Open Banking. This will provide the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with powers to regulate Open Banking – including FCA oversight of a so-called ‘Future Entity’ which will take on the functions currently carried out by OBL under the Order. Treasury officials are engaging with the CMA to inform the design of this future framework.
In due course, the Government will consult on its legislative approach, including the powers it intends to provide the FCA to ensure it can effectively oversee the Open Banking ecosystem and its participants.
|
| Bills |
|---|
|
Geotechnical Data Bill 2024-26
Presented by Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Private Members' Bill - Ten Minute Bill That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision about the collection of, setting of standards relating to, and secure sharing of geotechnical data derived from ground and site investigations; to require the integration of such data into the National Underground Asset Register; to confer duties on statutory undertakers and public authorities in connection with certain such data; and for connected purposes.
|
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Oral Evidence - Freshfields, X-energy, and Rolls Royce SMR Revisiting the nuclear roadmap - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: Q195 Mike Reader: The whole delivery, including construction and operations? |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 27th April 2026 3:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Revisiting the nuclear roadmap At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Lord Vallance - Minister for Science, Innovation, Research and Nuclear at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Sam White - Deputy Director, Nuclear Power at Department for Energy Security and Net Zero View calendar - Add to calendar |