To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 07 Dec 2021
Nationality and Borders Bill

"I am deeply concerned by and opposed to the great majority of the proposals in this inherently authoritarian Bill. Much of it appears to be written to satisfy front-page tabloid headlines rather than to fix the broken asylum system. It amounts to a fundamental rejection of our international obligations under …..."
Mohammad Yasin - View Speech

View all Mohammad Yasin (Lab - Bedford) contributions to the debate on: Nationality and Borders Bill

Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 17 May 2021
Safe Streets for All

"The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is a Bill of two halves. Many of my Labour colleagues had a hand in the development of much-needed new laws on the police covenant, assaults on emergency workers, the Lammy review and the extension of whole-life orders, but whole sections of the …..."
Mohammad Yasin - View Speech

View all Mohammad Yasin (Lab - Bedford) contributions to the debate on: Safe Streets for All

Written Question
British Nationality: Children
Monday 26th April 2021

Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when she plans to complete the review into child citizenship fees following the Court of Appeal February 2021 ruling that the current rate is unlawful.

Answered by Kevin Foster

The Home Office has acknowledged the Court of Appeal’s judgment and has committed to reviewing the child citizenship registration fee in line with its duties under Section 55. This review is on-going and the results will be published in due course


Written Question
Human Trafficking
Monday 15th February 2021

Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the findings of the report by Women for Refugee Women After Exploitation entitled Survivors Behind Bars, published on 4 February 2021, that the detention of trafficking victims has increased since the introduction of the Adults at Risk policy in 2016; and if she will make a statement.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

The Government does not have an absolute exclusion from detention for any particular group. However, we fully accept that some groups of individuals can be at particular risk of harm in immigration detention. This is the basis of the Adults at Risk in immigration detention (AAR) policy, which strengthens the presumption against detention for vulnerable individuals.

The policy covers a wider range of vulnerabilities and its introduction has enabled Home Office staff to promptly identify whether a person is vulnerable and consequently whether they should be detained. This allows for a more rounded assessment of such vulnerabilities in a detention setting, along with a balanced assessment of any immigration compliance, criminality factors and expected date of removal. The greater the evidence of vulnerability, the less likely it is that the individual will be detained.

Additional safeguards are also in place which underpin detention decisions, including regular reviews to ensure detention remains lawful, appropriate and proportionate.

All Home Office staff working in the detention system are also given training and support to identify and act upon indicators of vulnerability, including recognising victims of trafficking and modern slavery, at the earliest opportunity. If an individual is suspected to be a victim of trafficking, they will be referred into the National Referral Mechanism.


Written Question
Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal Centre
Tuesday 19th January 2021

Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 14 January 2021 to Question 136030, whether a person being initially processed at Yarl's Wood Immigration Removal centre will be moved to the new, temporary accommodation for asylum seekers on the adjacent site.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

All service users that might be accommodated in initial accommodation at Yarl’s Wood will have already completed the required period of self-isolation at another location before being transferred there.

Therefore, asylum seekers will not transfer directly from Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre to the initial accommodation on the adjacent site.


Written Question
Yarls Wood Immigration Removal Centre
Thursday 14th January 2021

Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will ensure that there is no cross-over between the residents of Yarls Wood Immigration Removal Centre and the asylum seekers to be homed in temporary accommodation on the same site.

Answered by Chris Philp - Shadow Home Secretary

To ensure we have sufficient accommodation available to meet our statutory obligations we are planning to use a vacant site adjacent to the existing Immigration Removal Centre to accommodate single, adult male asylum seekers.

Asylum seekers on this adjacent site are separate from the Immigration Removal Centre and are free to come and go as they please.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 16 Dec 2020
Immigration Rules: Supported Accommodation

"On Christmas eve, the first asylum seekers are due to arrive at the remote site of Yarl’s Wood immigration removal centre, where they will be housed in prefab-style accommodation. We have seen a similar approach in Kent and Wales, where Army barracks are being used, and other sites are planned. …..."
Mohammad Yasin - View Speech

View all Mohammad Yasin (Lab - Bedford) contributions to the debate on: Immigration Rules: Supported Accommodation

Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 23 Jun 2020
Windrush Compensation Scheme

"My constituent Dorian Green came to the UK 52 years ago at the age of nine. In 2008, the Home Office wrongly told his employer that he did not have the right to work. He has been in a battle with the Home Office ever since, and crucial documents were …..."
Mohammad Yasin - View Speech

View all Mohammad Yasin (Lab - Bedford) contributions to the debate on: Windrush Compensation Scheme

Written Question
Immigration: EU Nationals
Wednesday 11th March 2020

Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether EU citizens that are awarded pre-settled status will have the same entitlement to benefits after the transition period as they do now.

Answered by Kevin Foster

EU citizens and their family members who have obtained pre-settled status under the EU Settlement Scheme will continue to access benefits on the same basis and according to the same rules as they do now.

This means EU citizens will still need to demonstrate they are exercising a qualifying right to reside, for example as a worker, in order to access taxpayer funded benefits, such as Universal Credit. This will continue until their pre-settled status expires or until they are granted settled status.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 16 Oct 2019
Public Services

"It is an honour to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Coventry North East (Colleen Fletcher).

Never has a Government agenda looked so hollow. Everything on this Prime Minister’s wish list, masquerading as a Conservative party broadcast, being read out by Her Majesty in Westminster, was utterly dependent on …..."

Mohammad Yasin - View Speech

View all Mohammad Yasin (Lab - Bedford) contributions to the debate on: Public Services