View the Parallel Parliament page for Naz Shah

Information between 9th November 2025 - 29th November 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

---

Division Votes
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 309
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 311
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 318
24 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 367
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 320
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 320
25 Nov 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Naz Shah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 321

Speeches
Naz Shah speeches from: Asylum Policy Naz Shah contributed 1 speech (129 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office

Written Answers

Judgements Asked by: Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) Wednesday 26th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what mechanisms are in place to ensure timely correction of factual or chronological errors in published judgments to ensure that any discrepancies are removed from public record. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Responsibility for the accuracy of judgments rests with the independent judiciary. Courts have established procedures to correct errors promptly when they come to light. For example, under the Civil Procedure Rules, judges can amend accidental slips or omissions at any time. Substantive errors that may affect the meaning of the judgment may require a formal application to the court. Once corrected, the revised judgment replaces the original in official records and on the Find Case Law service, operated by the National Archives.

MP Financial Interests
17th November 2025 Naz Shah (Labour - Bradford West) 1.1. Employment and earnings - Ad hoc payments Payment received on 04 November 2025 - £8,225.00 Source

---

Naz Shah mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
17 Nov 2025, 6:52 p.m. - House of Commons " Naz Shah thank you. " Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood KC MP, The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Birmingham Ladywood, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript