Information between 14th April 2026 - 24th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes was Teller for the Noes and against the House Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 12 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Sixth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 11 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 13 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 11 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 10 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Representation of the People Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 13 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 77 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 78 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Paul Holmes voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Paul Holmes speeches from: Peter Mandelson: Government Appointment
Paul Holmes contributed 3 speeches (182 words) Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Paul Holmes speeches from: Security Vetting
Paul Holmes contributed 1 speech (72 words) Monday 20th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Paul Holmes speeches from: Representation of the People Bill (Eighth sitting)
Paul Holmes contributed 13 speeches (2,642 words) Committee stage: 8th sitting Thursday 16th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Paul Holmes speeches from: Representation of the People Bill (Sixth sitting)
Paul Holmes contributed 9 speeches (3,207 words) Committee stage: 6th sitting Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Property Development: Infrastructure
Asked by: Paul Holmes (Conservative - Hamble Valley) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what data his department has available on the time taken by local authorities to finalise infrastructure (S106) agreements for residential planning permissions. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Research conducted under the previous government in 2019, which can be found on gov.uk here, found that the large majority of S106 agreements were agreed and signed immediately but that the main cause of delay related to S106 agreements was the time taken by legal teams acting for both the applicant and Local Planning Authority to review the S106 agreements to ensure they were robust, which took an average of four to five months. As per the Written Ministerial Statement made on 28 January 2026 (HCWS1286), we want to simplify and strengthen the process for agreeing developer contributions through S106 agreements at the application stage of new developments. It is our intention to publish a template S106 agreement to speed up the process of drafting and concluding new S106 agreements. |
|
Affordable Housing: Vistry Group
Asked by: Paul Holmes (Conservative - Hamble Valley) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the answer of 17 March 2026 to UIN 120030, how much of the £252m allocated to Vistry has been paid; and how many of the 3,758 homes have been delivered. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) As of 31 March 2026, Vistry has received a total of £202 million from the allocated grant payments in question. As of the same date, Vistry had completed 2,569 homes of the 3,578 allocated with 3,486 homes started on site. |
|
Property Development: Infrastructure
Asked by: Paul Holmes (Conservative - Hamble Valley) Friday 24th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the time taken to finalise infrastructure agreements for residential planning permissions. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Developers may be asked to provide contributions for infrastructure in several ways. Planning obligations, in the form of S106 agreements, should only be used where it is not possible to address unacceptable impacts through a planning condition.
The government is aware that the negotiation of S106 agreements can create delays in the planning process and increase costs for developers and local planning authorities. As per the Written Ministerial Statement made on 28 January 2026 (HCWS1286), the government intend to work closely with local planning authorities, registered providers and developers to deliver a series of measures that will provide for a simpler, more transparent and more resilient S106 system. These include a standardised template S106 agreement to speed up the process of drafting and concluding new S106 agreements.
Section 278 agreements may also be required where developers need to carry out essential highways improvements to facilitate their projects. It is important that both developers and highways authorities engage early on the works needed to support development proposals to ensure timely decisions
The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a charge which can be levied by local authorities on new development in their area. The levy only applies in areas where a local authority has consulted on, and approved, a charging schedule which sets out its levy rates and has published the schedule on its website. Where CIL is in place for an area, charging authorities should work proactively with developers to ensure they are clear about the authorities’ infrastructure needs. My Department’s published guidance on CIL can be found on gov.uk here.
Any local planning authority that receives a developer contribution through CIL or S106 planning obligations is required to publish an Infrastructure Funding Statement at least annually, ensuring a transparent and accountable system.
To support local planning authorities in negotiating and concluding agreements in a timely manner, the government is investing in their capacity and capability. At the Autumn Budget 2024, the Chanceller announced a £46 million package of investment into the planning system as a one-year settlement for 2025-2026. At the Budget on 26 November 2025, the Chancellor announced a further £48 million of investment over three years to support local planning authorities to attract, retain and develop skilled planners over a sustained period. Of this, £28.8 million has been allocated to MHCLG’s Planning Capacity and Capability Programme, equating to £9.6 million additional per year for the next three years. This allocation will supplement existing budgets. This funding supports the recruitment of new planners and targeted skills development through the Planning Advisory Service, helping local authorities manage S106 and CIL processes effectively and accelerate infrastructure delivery. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 13th April Paul Holmes signed this EDM on Monday 20th April 2026 100th anniversary of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 101 signatures (Most recent: 21 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Adam Jogee (Labour - Newcastle-under-Lyme) That this House notes, with affection and respect, the 100th anniversary, on 21 April 2026 of the birth of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; reflects on the sense of loss that people throughout the United Kingdom, the realms, territories and Commonwealth still feel following Her late Majesty’s death on … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
20 Apr 2026, 5:41 p.m. - House of Commons " Paul Holmes thank you. >> Mr. Speaker. >> In the box note to the Prime Minister dated the 11th of November 2024, the former Cabinet Secretary, " Paul Holmes MP (Hamble Valley, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Representation of the People Bill (Sixth sitting)
61 speeches (15,177 words) Committee stage: 6th sitting Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Samantha Dixon (Lab - Chester North and Neston) —(Paul Holmes.)Question put, That the amendment be made. - Link to Speech |