To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 390
Division Vote (Commons)
18 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 304 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 313
Written Question
Adoption
Wednesday 18th June 2025

Asked by: Richard Quigley (Labour - Isle of Wight West)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take legislative steps to allow people over 18 to be formally adopted by their families.

Answered by Janet Daby - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The adoption of a child is about ensuring that a child has a permanent family, with the adopter taking legal and parental responsibility for them. At the age of 18, parental responsibility is no longer relevant, as an adult assumes responsibility for themselves. Introducing adoption for over 18s is not a priority as there is no legal imperative to introduce adult adoption. Legal processes, such as the making of a will, already enable individuals to pass on inheritance or financial rights without adoption being necessary. Similarly, the ability to legally change names through deed poll means that adoption is not the only way to share a family name.


Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 14 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 379
Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 328
Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 25 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 379 Noes - 137
Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 428
Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 336
Division Vote (Commons)
17 Jun 2025 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Richard Quigley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 335