Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Robert Neill and Baroness Fullbrook

Monday 30th April 2012 Commons Chamber

[Robert Neill]

I agree with my hon. Friend that there are sensible means of meeting deficit reduction targets, without having an impact on stations and staffing. I pointed that out in a letter to the shadow fire Minister, the hon. Member for Dudley North (Ian Austin), in December 2010. References to shared service, joint working, joint procurement, flexible shift patterns and working patterns are exactly the sort of issues that go-ahead fire authorities are taking on board.

[Lorraine Fullbrook (South Ribble) (Con)]

10. What steps his Department is taking to support local high streets.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Robert Neill and Baroness Fullbrook

Thursday 10th June 2010 Commons Chamber

[Lorraine Fullbrook (South Ribble) (Con)]

2. What ministerial directions in respect of an action likely to breach the requirements of financial propriety or regularity were issued to the accounting officer of his Department in the past 12 months.

[The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Robert Neill)]

Although there were no directions in the past 12 months due to propriety and regularity issues, two directions were issued to my Department’s accounting officer due to concerns that he had about the value for money of actions proposed by the then Secretary of State: one related to implementing unitary city councils in Exeter and Norwich; the other covered the purchase of Blackpool Leisure Assets. In the interests of transparency, I am today placing copies of both directions in the Library.

[Lorraine Fullbrook]

I thank my hon. Friend for that answer. I am sure that he is aware that the First Division Association—the civil servants’ union—has reported that Ministers in the previous Government systematically ignored civil service value-for-money considerations. Can he give us an assurance that this Government will not do the same thing?

[Robert Neill]

We are fortunate in having able and experienced civil servants at our Department, and we certainly want to listen to their advice. It is worth remembering that that direction not only ignored value-for-money considerations, but contradicted stances taken by the previous Government. We will seek value for money, and we will also seek to be consistent.