EU Defence: Permanent Structured Co-operation Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence
None Portrait The Chair
- Hansard -

We shall take Sir Robert Syms, for a change.

Robert Syms Portrait Sir Robert Syms (Poole) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I listened carefully to the Minister’s statement, which was extremely sensible and pragmatic. Our principle concern is as a strong supporter of NATO, but we are taking a pragmatic approach to working with our European partners to ensure that that work is complementary to, rather than competitive with, NATO. The Government’s approach is sensible and is supported by NATO, and we should bless what the Government are doing and hope that we can work out further co-operation, particularly in the industrial area, where there may be future projects in which we want to participate.

Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton Portrait Mark Lancaster
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s question. He effectively summarises the Government’s position very well. We are being pragmatic but are equally optimistic. Without repeating myself, we believe that what UK industry has offered historically and continues to offer is of mutual benefit to our partners across Europe in delivering European security, but we have red lines. We are absolutely clear that, once we leave the EU, we will maintain sovereign control of our military assets, but there is a positive way forward.