Information between 5th January 2026 - 15th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sam Carling voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Pensions: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Sam Carling (Labour - North West Cambridgeshire) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that the inclusion of unused pension funds in estates for Inheritance Tax purposes will not increase the time taken to process legacies to charities and families. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Most unused pension funds and death benefits payable from a pension will form part of a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes from 6 April 2027. This removes distortions from changes that have been made to pensions tax policy over the last decade, which have led to pensions being openly used and marketed as a tax planning vehicle to transfer wealth, rather than as a way to fund retirement.
The government has taken steps to ensure that these changes strike a fair balance between beneficiaries of a deceased person’s pension benefits and beneficiaries of their wider estate. At Budget 2025, the government announced changes to help ensure that benefits payable from the deceased’s wider estate are not delayed unnecessarily if inheritance tax is also due on pension benefits. Personal representatives will be able to fund any inheritance tax attributable to the pension by directing pension scheme administrators to withhold 50% of taxable benefits for up to 15 months from the date of death. Personal representatives can then continue to distribute assets from the wider estate as normal.
To ensure that the process of calculating, reporting and paying inheritance tax does not take longer than necessary, the government will introduce regulations setting out deadlines for the parties involved to exchange information.
Most UK pensions schemes are discretionary, which means that the pension scheme trustees or manager have the final say on how death benefits are paid. They must exercise this power reasonably and in accordance with the scheme’s rules.
Members can complete an "expression of wish" or nomination form to indicate their preferred beneficiaries for death benefits. While trustees typically follow these wishes, they are not legally bound to do so. This flexibility allows them to consider other evidence, such as family circumstances at the time of death or wishes expressed in a will. |
|
Pensions: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: Sam Carling (Labour - North West Cambridgeshire) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in relation to changes to bring pensions pots into estates for Inheritance Tax purposes, whether the letter of wishes provided by a pension beneficiary or a will are intended to take precedence in the event that they differ. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Most unused pension funds and death benefits payable from a pension will form part of a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes from 6 April 2027. This removes distortions from changes that have been made to pensions tax policy over the last decade, which have led to pensions being openly used and marketed as a tax planning vehicle to transfer wealth, rather than as a way to fund retirement.
The government has taken steps to ensure that these changes strike a fair balance between beneficiaries of a deceased person’s pension benefits and beneficiaries of their wider estate. At Budget 2025, the government announced changes to help ensure that benefits payable from the deceased’s wider estate are not delayed unnecessarily if inheritance tax is also due on pension benefits. Personal representatives will be able to fund any inheritance tax attributable to the pension by directing pension scheme administrators to withhold 50% of taxable benefits for up to 15 months from the date of death. Personal representatives can then continue to distribute assets from the wider estate as normal.
To ensure that the process of calculating, reporting and paying inheritance tax does not take longer than necessary, the government will introduce regulations setting out deadlines for the parties involved to exchange information.
Most UK pensions schemes are discretionary, which means that the pension scheme trustees or manager have the final say on how death benefits are paid. They must exercise this power reasonably and in accordance with the scheme’s rules.
Members can complete an "expression of wish" or nomination form to indicate their preferred beneficiaries for death benefits. While trustees typically follow these wishes, they are not legally bound to do so. This flexibility allows them to consider other evidence, such as family circumstances at the time of death or wishes expressed in a will. |
|
Pensions: Charitable Donations
Asked by: Sam Carling (Labour - North West Cambridgeshire) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her department has made of the potential benefits of allowing direct gifting of pensions funds to charity during a pension holder’s lifetime, in the content of the recommendations in the Final report of the Social Impact Investment Advisory Group. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) This is a complex area of pensions tax policy, and any reform would require detailed assessment of its implications for the pension tax system, its administration, consumer protection, and long-term retirement outcomes. The Treasury regularly engages with departments, including HMRC, to ensure complete assessments are made.
While no decisions have been taken at this stage, we will continue to keep these recommendations under review. At present however, members can complete an "expression of wish" or nomination form to indicate their preferred beneficiaries for death benefits. While trustees typically follow these wishes, they are not legally bound to do so. This flexibility allows them to consider other evidence, such as family circumstances at the time of death or wishes expressed in a will. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
7 Jan 2026, 12:50 p.m. - House of Commons "Russell Gareth Snell Afzal Khan Sam Carling Jeevun Sandher and myself, " Ten Minute Rule Motion: Student finance (review of payment schedules) Mr Luke Charters MP (York Outer, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Student Finance (Review of Payment Schedules)
6 speeches (1,353 words) 1st reading Wednesday 7th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Luke Charters (Lab - York Outer) Abtisam Mohamed, Tom Hayes, Pam Cox, Luke Myer, Mike Reader, Sarah Russell, Gareth Snell, Afzal Khan, Sam Carling - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 9th January 2026
Report - 4th Report - Ministerial Statements and the Ministerial Code Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Campbell-Savours (Labour; Penrith and Solway) Charlotte Cane (Liberal Democrat; Ely and East Cambridgeshire) Sam Carling |
|
Tuesday 6th January 2026
Oral Evidence - Re:State Public Bodies - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: Q161 Sam Carling: Thank you very much, Chair—it is a great honour. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Civil Service Commission At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston - First Civil Service Commissioner at Civil Service Commission At 11:00am: Oral evidence Sir Laurie Magnus CBE - Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 2:45 p.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Cabinet Office At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office (Minister for the Constitution and European Union Relations) at Cabinet Office Catherine Little CB - Chief Operating Officer for the Civil Service and Permanent Secretary to the Cabinet Office at Cabinet Office Hermione Gough - EU Director at Cabinet Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd February 2026 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK At 10:00am: Oral evidence Councillor Matt Boughton - Chair of the LGA Safer and Stronger Communities Committee at Local Government Association, and Leader at Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Councillor Iain Hamilton - Chair at National Association of Local Councils Kim Wright - Spokesperson on Leadership and Learning at Solace, and Chief Executive at Brent Council View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
23 Jan 2026
The work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 27 Feb 2026) The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee scrutinises the work and performance of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. New Ombudsman Paula Sussex CBE has been in post since August 2025 and the Committee plans to hold an oral evidence session with her and other senior leaders soon. The Committee is keen to examine the organisation’s priorities under new leadership, with the new corporate strategy due to be published soon, as well as its performance in handling individual complaints and utilising data to identify wider potential concerns in public sector administration. Read the call for evidence for more information. |