Information between 11th October 2026 - 21st October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Edwards voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sarah Edwards speeches from: Chetwynd Bridge
Sarah Edwards contributed 2 speeches (195 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Sarah Edwards speeches from: Underperforming NHS Trusts: Government Oversight
Sarah Edwards contributed 1 speech (109 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Buses: Schools
Asked by: Sarah Edwards (Labour - Tamworth) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of Section 19 permit exemptions for teachers driving pupils on school trips on safety; and whether she plans to review the training, qualification and safety requirements applicable to teachers operating vehicles under such permits. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Operating vehicles under Section 19 permits comes with important obligations. To support permit holders with their responsibilities, we publish guidance to promote and support the correct and safe use of vehicles operated under permits. The guidance explains that they must ensure that drivers are correctly trained, have the correct driving licence, and take adequate breaks.
There is also specific guidance for schools and local authorities on driving minibuses, which is published jointly with the Department of Education.
We are aware of calls for changes to minibus driver licensing arrangements and remain engaged on the issues with the Department for Education.
|
|
Asylum: Tamworth
Asked by: Sarah Edwards (Labour - Tamworth) Wednesday 14th October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the continued use of a hotel that has been closed to the public since 2022 to accommodate asylum seekers on the economy of Tamworth town centre. Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government is clear that asylum hotels are not a sustainable solution and represent poor value for money. We are committed to ending their use and closing all such sites by the end of this Parliament. Decisions on the use and closure of individual sites are informed by factors including operational feasibility, cost, community cohesion, and engagement with local authorities and statutory partners. As closures progress, sites will be prioritised on this basis and in line with the Government’s objective of reducing the number of people requiring asylum accommodation. For safety, security and wellbeing reasons, we do not comment publicly on individual hotels that may or may not be used for asylum accommodation, nor do we publish a closure schedule. Once a hotel is confirmed for closure, the local authority Chief Executive, MP and statutory partners will be notified. |
|
Asylum: Hotels
Asked by: Sarah Edwards (Labour - Tamworth) Wednesday 14th October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what plans she has to end the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers in Staffordshire; and what timetable has been set for the closure of remaining asylum hotels in the county. Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government is clear that asylum hotels are not a sustainable solution and represent poor value for money. We are committed to ending their use and closing all such sites by the end of this Parliament. Decisions on the use and closure of individual sites are informed by factors including operational feasibility, cost, community cohesion, and engagement with local authorities and statutory partners. As closures progress, sites will be prioritised on this basis and in line with the Government’s objective of reducing the number of people requiring asylum accommodation. For safety, security and wellbeing reasons, we do not comment publicly on individual hotels that may or may not be used for asylum accommodation, nor do we publish a closure schedule. Once a hotel is confirmed for closure, the local authority Chief Executive, MP and statutory partners will be notified. |
|
Asylum: Hotels
Asked by: Sarah Edwards (Labour - Tamworth) Thursday 15th October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of (a) the appropriateness of using hotels to accommodate asylum seekers in areas that experienced violent disorder during summer 2024, and (b) the potential impact on (i) community cohesion, (ii) public safety and (iii) local policing resources. Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office) This Government is clear that asylum hotels are not a sustainable solution and represent poor value for money. We are committed to ending their use and closing all such sites by the end of this Parliament. The safety and welfare of asylum seekers and local communities is a priority. All asylum accommodation is carefully managed, supported by dedicated security arrangements and strong engagement with local policing and safeguarding partners. These partnerships help to mitigate risks and ensure proportionate action is taken to protect residents, staff, and local communities. Decisions on the use and closure of individual sites are informed by factors including operational feasibility, cost, community cohesion, and engagement with local authorities and statutory partners. As closures progress, sites will be prioritised on this basis and in line with the Government’s objective of reducing the number of people requiring asylum accommodation. For safety, security and wellbeing reasons, we do not comment publicly on individual hotels that may or may not be used for asylum accommodation, nor do we publish a closure schedule. |
|
Asylum: Housing
Asked by: Sarah Edwards (Labour - Tamworth) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department plans to reimburse charities for the costs of providing emergency accommodation to asylum seekers who have been incorrectly evicted from Home Office-provided accommodation while their asylum claims remain subject to appeal. Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office) The Department would not reimburse charities for the costs of providing emergency accommodation in these circumstances. Individuals will always receive at least seven days of asylum support following notification that their support is being stopped, although this period is usually longer. This provides time for individuals to make an appeal or submit a reinstatement request before an eviction takes place. Where an appeal is made in time, the individual can continue receiving their existing asylum support. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Chetwynd Bridge
19 speeches (2,886 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Dave Robertson (Lab - Lichfield) Friend the Member for Tamworth (Sarah Edwards). - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 20th October 2026 2 p.m. Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Jonathan Reynolds MP - Secretary of State at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Amanda Brooks CBE - Interim Permanent Secretary at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 27th October 2026 2 p.m. Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Entrepreneurship and business At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Philip Salter - Founder at The Entrepreneurs Network Professor Mark Hart - Lead at Global Entrepreneurship Monitor UK Professor Monder Ram - Founder-Director at Centre for Research in Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurship, Aston University Jordan Dargue - Co-Founder at Lifted Ventures At 3:10pm: Oral evidence Matt Adey - Chief Economist at British Business Bank Rt Hon Michael Moore - Chief Executive at UK Private Capital Chris Lewis - Chair at Venture Capital Trust Association At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Edward Woodall - Chief Executive at Association of Convenience Stores Joe Harrison - Chief Executive at National Market Traders Federation Lee Wilcox - Chief Executive and Co-Founder at On The Tools View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 3rd November 2026 2 p.m. Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Consumer protection At 2:30pm: Oral evidence David Bowles - Head of Public Affairs at Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Steve Raper - Chairman at British Fireworks Association Alan Friggieri - Director of Strategy and Communications at Combat Stress At 3:10pm: Oral evidence Sue Davies MBE - Head of Consumer Rights and Food Policy at Which? David MacKenzie - Lead Officer for eCommerce at Chartered Trading Standards Institute At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Kate Dearden MP - Minister for the Future of Work at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Emma Cochrane - Executive Director for Consumer Protection at Competition and Markets Authority Sophie George - Deputy Director, Product Regulation Policy at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Graham Russell MBE - Chief Executive of the Office for Product Safety and Standards at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Tony Thomas - Deputy Director, Consumer Policy at Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
19 Oct 2026
UK export support services Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Committee are launching an inquiry into the UK export support system. The inquiry examines whether the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade alongside UK Export Finance:
Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |
|
16 Oct 2026
Entrepreneurship and business Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 Nov 2026) Entrepreneurs are vital to driving growth, innovation, competition, productivity and job creation, across the country and across communities. The Committee's inquiries into Small Business Strategy and Investing in the UK Economy examined how businesses grow and access scale-up finance. Now we are studying the start-up phase, considering:
This inquiry will examine the UK's entrepreneurial ecosystem, consider lessons from international comparators, and explore the roles of education, finance, innovation and government policy in supporting business creation. It will also examine entrepreneurship in the skilled trades, including the journey from sole trader to employer, and the factors that help or hinder tradespeople in building viable businesses and taking on apprentices. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |